The Minciu
Sodas laboratory's strategy to develop an
Import/Export Standard for Aggregates of Notes
Latest Steps | Previous
Steps | Commercial Strategy
| Underlying Projects
Latest Steps
Andrius Kulikauskas will prepare a proposal for our next investigation
for Phil Stenton of HP Labs in Bristol, UK to review and evaluate.
1999.10.28: Letter of Introduction
to Phil Stenton
Previous Steps
1999.10.06: Infrared
Lets Ideas Move, letter to Robert Stuart, Chairman of the Marketing
Committee of the Infrared Data Association.
1999.09.17: Developing
Import/Export Standards for Aggregates of Notes submitted to the
Workshop on New Paradigms in Information Visualization and Manipulation.
1999.06: Organizing
Thoughts into Sequences, Hierarchies, and Networks presented at
the Workshop on EMMSAD.
1999.04.21: Mobile
Computing Encourages Thinking: Complement X-IRMC-FIELDS with vThought
presented at the meeting of the Infrared Mobile Computing workforce
1999.03.30: EAI
Takes on the Vertical Dimension: Integration of Documentation at
the DCI conference on Enterprise Application Integration.
1999.01.28: Proposals
for the Unified Knowledge Language at the first standards meeting
of the Knowledge Management Consortium International.
Commercial Strategy
The development of an import/export standard for aggregates of notes affects
a wide variety of companies. I am putting together a list of twenty
or thirty companies that could benefit as catalysts for building relationships
through the development of this standard. My goal is to find two
or three companies that wish to play this role by sponsoring our investigations.
Contact me at ms@ms.lt if your company might be interested. Andrius
Kulikauskas, Director.
So many interests are involved that it is important to understand where
they develop from. The original issue is that we thinkers want to
reflect on our thoughts. This involves three steps:
-
Punctuating the thought, writing it down as an individual thought.
-
Manipulating the thought, placing it within a sequence, tree, and/or web
of thoughts, archiving it.
-
Visualizing the thought, restructuring the sequence, tree, and/or web that
it belongs to, reading those thoughts so as to reflect on them and create
new thoughts.
All three steps can occur within the human mind. We may also augment our
thinking with tools such as paper and pencil, or electronic devices, so
as to more clearly punctuate, more decisively manipulate, and more broadly
visualize our thoughts.
An individual recording several new ideas every day can build up a collection
of ten thousand notes. Electronic devices open up the possibility
of working with such a collection. The problem is that when individuals
use software for organizing notes, the products get discontinued, and the
notes get trapped in the product. The notes represent an investment
that cannot be recovered and that is placed at greater and greater risk.
So the key problem is that we want to work with a body of notes that we
want to outlast the software that we use to work on it.
-
Synchronizers. Help us transport information from one archive to
another, and in between products. Benefit from more varied and heavy
traffic. Puma
-
Software makers. Help us punctuate, manipulate, visualize information.
Benefit from use in corporate environment. Lotus, Microsoft Outlook.
-
Archiving solutions. Help ensure the longevity of data. Kodak.
Microsoft, Windows CE
Apple
IrDA
Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Ericsson
Hewlett-Packard
KMCI
Arthur Andersen
EIC
BEA: I spoke with Jena Smith, secretary for Barbara Britton,
and will prepare materials for her.
IBM (Dr.David A.Ferrucci), New York: I wrote a letter
and sent my paper. [AK, 9/99]
Indiana University: I spoke over the phone with Christopher
Peebles, Associate Vice President, Dean of Academic computing, and sent
him my paper. He invited me to come visit Indiana University.
Oracle
Qualcomm
Starfish "Global Synchronization and Integration of Wireless
and Wireline Devices"
Computer Sciences Corporation:
Symbol Technologies:
Sun: Joseph A. Goguen knows one of the founders, Von Pratt,
who is teaching at Stanford.
Visto:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Dr.James W.Doane is leading
the knowledge management effort. Returns October 11th. Can
give the web address for their knowledge management document, also help
contact person in charge of expert connections. [1999.09.30, AK]
OpenText: Laurie A. Murphy of PSSoftware said they have just
purchased her company, and might be interested. [1999.09.30, AK]
Notes:
Starfish
Underlying Projects
Our work on this standard depends on eight of our projects, four of which
are already underway.
Clarify Rationale for a Standard. One project will help
us keep clarifying the reason for having a standard.
-
Uses of Reasons for Thinking
will consider domains of thinking, and what in each domain is considered
creative. In particular, this project will help us identify domains
where organizing and reorganizing sequences, hierarchies, and networks
has creative value. Our results will point to fields where a standard
is relevant, such as knowledge management, mobile computing, object
technology, modeling languages, user interfaces, enterprise application
integration, library sciences, and so on.
Design the Right Standard. Three projects will help us define
the standard correctly.
-
Features of Structures for
Thinking will consider the effects of structure on thinking, and
what these effects determine about a general format for information.
For example, organizing ideas in a sequence distinguishes the strong ideas
and the weak ideas, organizing ideas in a tree - the broad ideas and the
narrow ideas, and organizing ideas in a network distinguishes the vague
ideas and the clear ideas. This is the key project for defining
a standard because we need to define sequences, hierarchies, and networks
in the way that is most appropriate for humans.
-
Structures for Thinking
considers ways of structuring information, and the associated organizing
principles. We are using this project to determine the appropriate
scope for the standard. Andrius Kulikauskas, Ph.D. and Saulius Maskeliunas,
Ph.D. discuss the results they have collected so far in their paper Organizing
Thoughts into Sequences, Hierarchies, and Networks for the
Workshop on Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design
(EMMSAD'99). The paper distinguishes between internal and external
structurings, and shows that sequences, hierarchies, and networks are the
basic external structurings, in that restructuring them accounts for
the various ways of visualizing information.
-
Formats for Thinking
considers standards for structuring information, and ways each may be interpreted
as a format for thoughts. A conceptual standard for sequences, hierarchies,
and networks will need to be expressed in various existing standards
such as XML and UML.
Demonstrate Applications of the Standard. Two projects will help
us check the usefulness of the standard, both for thinkers, and for devices.
-
Uses of Structures for Thinking
will consider useful restructurings of information, and the tools and formats
that each such restructuring requires. We need to design converters
to transfer sequences, hierarchies, and networks of information to a standard
from common formats such as HTML, Lotus Notes, and Microsoft Word.
We will explore the advantages of transfering information from such
formats to those of our members, such as Natrificial Software Technologies,
www.thebrain.com, makers of The Brain.
-
Uses of Formats for Thinking
will consider possible applications of a universal format for thoughts,
and how they might be realized through existing formats. Members
of the Infrared Mobile Computing workgroup of the Infrared Data Association
indicated that a standard for sequences, hierarchies, and networks of information
could be implemented within twelve months if the standard could be used
for innovative exchanges via infrared waves between consumer appliances.
Find Sponsors for the Standard. Two projects will help us find sponsors
for work on the standard.
-
Tools for Thinking considers
tools for thinking, and the faculties of thought they support. This
project helps us identify software makers who might participate
in the development of the standard.
Uses of Tools for Thinking
considers projects of thinkers, and what they reflect about the needs of
thinkers. This project helps us identify software users who
might participate in the development of the standard.