Mintys.Aštuonerybė istorijaPaslėpti nežymius pakeitimus - Rodyti kodo pakeitimus 2023 rugsėjo 19 d., 14:22
atliko -
Pridėtos 131-132 eilutės:
7+1=0, 6+2=0 (dvejybė yra pasirinkimas), 5+3=0 (trejybė yra trejybės ratas, trys matai erdvės, o penkerybėje glūdi vienas matas, laiko matas) 2023 rugsėjo 19 d., 12:05
atliko -
Pridėtos 127-130 eilutės:
2022 sausio 19 d., 20:34
atliko -
Pridėta 22 eilutė:
Pridėta 44 eilutė:
2022 sausio 19 d., 20:27
atliko -
Pridėta 21 eilutė:
Pridėtos 39-43 eilutės:
Aštuonerybė
Pakeistos 45-46 eilutės iš
į:
Pakeistos 124-127 eilutės iš
į:
2021 balandžio 17 d., 16:52
atliko -
Pridėta 20 eilutė:
2021 vasario 27 d., 11:57
atliko -
Pakeistos 103-116 eilutės iš
į:
Aštuonerybėje glūdi trejybės ratas
2021 vasario 27 d., 11:56
atliko -
Pakeistos 93-103 eilutės iš
į:
Aštuonerybė sieja ketverybę ir požiūrio lygtį
2021 vasario 27 d., 11:52
atliko -
Ištrintos 48-50 eilutės:
Pakeistos 90-93 eilutės iš
į:
Užrašai
2021 vasario 17 d., 22:36
atliko -
Pridėtos 30-32 eilutės:
2021 vasario 03 d., 20:31
atliko -
Pridėtos 30-32 eilutės:
2021 sausio 29 d., 15:26
atliko -
Pridėtos 1-2 eilutės:
Pakeistos 5-8 eilutės iš
Aštuonerybe vadinu Dievo sūnaus sandarą Dievo šokyje. Ją sieju su padalinimų ratu, taip pat su aštuongubu keliu ir kitais netroškimais. Aštuonerybė yra tuo pačiu visko padalinimas į aštuonis požiūrius, tad jinai prieštarauja sau ir prilygsta nulybei. Jinai susidaro iš ketverybės ir gyvenimo lygties kryžiaus. Šias dvi sandaras atskyrus galima bene apriboti prieštaravimą. Jinai išsako klaidų rūšis. į:
Kaip aštuonerybė grindžia tarpą? Aštuonerybė Pakeista 11 eilutė iš:
į:
Pakeista 20 eilutė iš:
į:
Pridėtos 22-25 eilutės:
Aštuonerybe vadinu Dievo sūnaus sandarą Dievo šokyje. Ją sieju su padalinimų ratu, taip pat su aštuongubu keliu ir kitais netroškimais. Aštuonerybė yra tuo pačiu visko padalinimas į aštuonis požiūrius, tad jinai prieštarauja sau ir prilygsta nulybei. Jinai susidaro iš ketverybės ir gyvenimo lygties kryžiaus. Šias dvi sandaras atskyrus galima bene apriboti prieštaravimą. Jinai išsako klaidų rūšis. 2017 gruodžio 27 d., 18:00
atliko -
Pridėtos 10-12 eilutės:
2017 gruodžio 27 d., 17:20
atliko -
Pridėtos 3-6 eilutės:
Aštuonerybe vadinu Dievo sūnaus sandarą Dievo šokyje. Ją sieju su padalinimų ratu, taip pat su aštuongubu keliu ir kitais netroškimais. Aštuonerybė yra tuo pačiu visko padalinimas į aštuonis požiūrius, tad jinai prieštarauja sau ir prilygsta nulybei. Jinai susidaro iš ketverybės ir gyvenimo lygties kryžiaus. Šias dvi sandaras atskyrus galima bene apriboti prieštaravimą. Jinai išsako klaidų rūšis. Pakeistos 9-10 eilutės iš
Išryškinti aštuonerybę. Kaip ir kodėl jinai tampa rūpesčių, brandos ir klaidų rūšių sandara? į:
2017 kovo 27 d., 22:22
atliko -
Pridėtos 23-27 eilutės:
I noticed the EightfoldWay and its three canonical forms in 1987-1988. In 1994 I noticed the OperatingPrinciples and then in 1995 I related them to the IAmStatements. In 1995 I came up with a model for the EmotionalResponses. In 1996 I noticed the Counterquestions and came up with a model for them. All of these models consisted of seven/eight perspectives and I presumed that they were related to the eightfold way. But it was all so complex that I couldn't find a general approach. Then in 1998 I decided to think of all the structures in terms of their purposes, what they were accomplishing. I was able to distinguish between that were useful in their own right (which I called the PrimaryStructures) and those that were auxiliary, useful as part of a structural language (and I called them SecondaryStructures). I noted that there were four primary and six secondary structures. In 1999, I realized that the latter six could be thought of as injections of the other four, in that the Divisions can be derived by way of God taking up the Counterquestions. I needed to find a general approach. So I rethought the EmotionalResponses by doing a study of Jesus' emotions in the Gospel of Mark, and thereby coming up with his speaking to the good, which I related to the DirectionsFromTheGood. I then looked for a GeneralStructure that would have what is common to all four PrimaryStructures. I was able to work out diagrams which made clear the similarity in structures. These were thought through by thinking about the roles of why, how and what, for example, in the counterquestions as opposed to the eightfold way. But it appeared that any general structure would simply be the simplest of the four structures, EverythingWishesForNothing. Meanwhile, some key ideas fell into place: the distinction between Life and EternalLife, the idea that the structures are what allows others to see themselves through us, and an AlgebraOfViews. Now a helpful distinction is between the observer and their observational plane. 2017 kovo 22 d., 12:50
atliko -
Pakeista 28 eilutė iš:
God has four {{Representations}}: į:
God has four representations: Pakeista 45 eilutė iš:
į:
2017 kovo 22 d., 12:50
atliko -
Pridėtos 25-49 eilutės:
Structure God has four {{Representations}}:
A "structural framework" expresses what is beyond a representation of God. They describe the life that we find ourselves in. There are four such frameworks, one for each representation.
Each of these structural frameworks has much in common, so we might speak of a Structural Framework. Each framework consists of eight perspectives.
God goes beyond himself. They give God's view.
2017 kovo 22 d., 12:47
atliko -
Pakeistos 26-43 eilutės iš
Relate this to the LevelsOfUnderstanding: The purpose of the general structure is to allow a perspective to see itself. It sees itself through us by having a structure (the threesome) through which it sees through our eyes, and a structure by which we see through its eyes. In this way it can see itself through us. Therefore there is a dual empathy. ===Notes=== General structure is that structure by which we (or life, or one) can be seen through and see through the eyes of another. General structure bounds us, but not the other. In the broadest sense, general structure is that by which life (God through us - God is good) evokes God and they interact. I think it is also the relationship between everything and anything, between nullsome and onesome. The nullsome has no perspectives - and is not restricted by the general structure, whereas the onesome has one perspective - as given by the general structure. Our perspective is always the same. It is given alternately by three perspectives that interpolate between taking a stand, following through and reflecting. The other's perspective is an alternate interpolation between these three (taking a stand, following through and reflecting) and what we consider to be null (which has either zero, one, two or three perspectives). The other's perspective is made specific by the nullsome, onesome, twosome, threesome, each of which have four representations (in terms of God's separation from himself). Here God (nullsome) is the referent. Our perspective is given by the foursome, fivesome, sixsome, sevensome, each of which have two representations (God's outlook - increasing slack, and life's outlook - decreasing slack). Here everything (onesome) is the referent. (A more general, structural take on God. God that may not be God.) (Example: everything wishes for... gives the foursome). Our eyes are given by shifts in the threesome. a representation of the threesome. The Their eyes are given by what is null to us, as expressed from their perspective. We see through their eyes by mapping each of our three eyes to their null, by means of one of their perspectives, if any. Apparently, the general structure has eight perspectives. One of these is a wishing (a representation of everything, a property of God). The other seven describe an associated framework for not-wishing. In that framework, three perspectives describe God's outlook, and three describe a human's outlook. The seventh perspective brings together the humans' outlook and expresses slack (and the thought that God is good). The representations of everything are given by wishing. Wishing makes no distinction between that which is within system and that which is without sytsem. Not-wishing makes a distinction between that which is within the system and that which is without system. The representations of anything are given by choosing. Choosing makes a distinction between that which is within system and that which is without system. į:
Ištrinta 35 eilutė:
2017 kovo 22 d., 12:46
atliko -
Pridėtos 23-49 eilutės:
Relate this to the LevelsOfUnderstanding: The purpose of the general structure is to allow a perspective to see itself. It sees itself through us by having a structure (the threesome) through which it sees through our eyes, and a structure by which we see through its eyes. In this way it can see itself through us. Therefore there is a dual empathy. ===Notes=== General structure is that structure by which we (or life, or one) can be seen through and see through the eyes of another. General structure bounds us, but not the other. In the broadest sense, general structure is that by which life (God through us - God is good) evokes God and they interact. I think it is also the relationship between everything and anything, between nullsome and onesome. The nullsome has no perspectives - and is not restricted by the general structure, whereas the onesome has one perspective - as given by the general structure. Our perspective is always the same. It is given alternately by three perspectives that interpolate between taking a stand, following through and reflecting. The other's perspective is an alternate interpolation between these three (taking a stand, following through and reflecting) and what we consider to be null (which has either zero, one, two or three perspectives). The other's perspective is made specific by the nullsome, onesome, twosome, threesome, each of which have four representations (in terms of God's separation from himself). Here God (nullsome) is the referent. Our perspective is given by the foursome, fivesome, sixsome, sevensome, each of which have two representations (God's outlook - increasing slack, and life's outlook - decreasing slack). Here everything (onesome) is the referent. (A more general, structural take on God. God that may not be God.) (Example: everything wishes for... gives the foursome). Our eyes are given by shifts in the threesome. a representation of the threesome. The Their eyes are given by what is null to us, as expressed from their perspective. We see through their eyes by mapping each of our three eyes to their null, by means of one of their perspectives, if any. Apparently, the general structure has eight perspectives. One of these is a wishing (a representation of everything, a property of God). The other seven describe an associated framework for not-wishing. In that framework, three perspectives describe God's outlook, and three describe a human's outlook. The seventh perspective brings together the humans' outlook and expresses slack (and the thought that God is good). The representations of everything are given by wishing. Wishing makes no distinction between that which is within system and that which is without sytsem. Not-wishing makes a distinction between that which is within the system and that which is without system. The representations of anything are given by choosing. Choosing makes a distinction between that which is within system and that which is without system. Here are properties of general structure, they are common to all four primary structures:
2017 kovo 22 d., 12:17
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
į:
Pakeistos 8-9 eilutės iš
į:
Pakeistos 20-22 eilutės iš
Kadaise pora metų nesėkmingai ieškojau bendros sandaros (general structure) grindžiančios keturias pirmines sandaras. Galiausiai nusprendžiau, kad ta bendra sandara tėra +0 lygmens pirminė sandara, būtent poreikių sandara. Taip pat pamąstydavau, kad tai yra aštuonerybė. Kada pirmines sandaras suprantame kaip mūsų santykius, Dievo troškimais, su Dievu, ir jeigu pasišaliname, tai gali likti visaregis, kuriuo Dievas per mus regi viską. į:
Kadaise (maždaug 1999-2002?) keletą metų nesėkmingai ieškojau bendros sandaros (general structure) grindžiančios keturias pirmines sandaras. Galiausiai nusprendžiau, kad ta bendra sandara tėra +0 lygmens pirminė sandara, būtent poreikių sandara. Taip pat pamąstydavau, kad tai yra aštuonerybė. Kada pirmines sandaras suprantame kaip mūsų santykius, Dievo troškimais, su Dievu, ir jeigu pasišaliname, tai gali likti visaregis, kuriuo Dievas per mus regi viską. 2016 m. apžvelgiau ir surūšiavau savo klaidas, gavosi dvi poros Toulmin ketverybės. 2017 m. surūšiavau rūpesčius, atpažinau šešis atvaizdus ir dar dvi papildomas rūšis. Rūpesčius susiejau su klaidomis. Panašiai, brandą surūšiavau ir įžvelgiau Dievo rūpesčius. Susiejau su aštuonerybe - su ketverybe ir gyvenimo lygtimi. Paskui bemąstydamas ryšį tarp Dievo šokio ir žmogaus elgesio, supratau, kad Sūnaus aštuongubą kelią verčiau suprasčiau, kaip šią aštuonerybę, susidedančią iš ketverybės ir gyvenimo lygties, ir esančią bendrą santvarką, iš kurios kildenamos pirminės sandaros. 2017 kovo 22 d., 11:50
atliko -
Pakeistos 15-16 eilutės iš
į:
Pakeistos 19-21 eilutės iš
Kadaise pora metų nesėkmingai ieškojau bendros sandaros grindžiančios keturias pirmines sandaras. Galiausiai nusprendžiau, kad ta bendra sandara tėra +0 lygmens pirminė sandara, būtent poreikių sandara. Taip pat pamąstydavau, kad tai yra aštuonerybė. Kada pirmines sandaras suprantame kaip mūsų santykius, Dievo troškimais, su Dievu, ir jeigu pasišaliname, tai gali likti visaregis, kuriuo Dievas per mus regi viską. į:
Kadaise pora metų nesėkmingai ieškojau bendros sandaros (general structure) grindžiančios keturias pirmines sandaras. Galiausiai nusprendžiau, kad ta bendra sandara tėra +0 lygmens pirminė sandara, būtent poreikių sandara. Taip pat pamąstydavau, kad tai yra aštuonerybė. Kada pirmines sandaras suprantame kaip mūsų santykius, Dievo troškimais, su Dievu, ir jeigu pasišaliname, tai gali likti visaregis, kuriuo Dievas per mus regi viską. 2017 kovo 22 d., 11:49
atliko -
Pakeistos 13-18 eilutės iš
į:
Bendra sandara Kadaise pora metų nesėkmingai ieškojau bendros sandaros grindžiančios keturias pirmines sandaras. Galiausiai nusprendžiau, kad ta bendra sandara tėra +0 lygmens pirminė sandara, būtent poreikių sandara. Taip pat pamąstydavau, kad tai yra aštuonerybė. Kada pirmines sandaras suprantame kaip mūsų santykius, Dievo troškimais, su Dievu, ir jeigu pasišaliname, tai gali likti visaregis, kuriuo Dievas per mus regi viską. 2017 kovo 21 d., 19:08
atliko -
Pridėtos 1-2 eilutės:
Pakeistos 7-11 eilutės iš
į:
Rūpesčiai
2017 kovo 21 d., 17:42
atliko -
Pridėtos 1-5 eilutės:
Išryškinti aštuonerybę. Kaip ir kodėl jinai tampa rūpesčių, brandos ir klaidų rūšių sandara? |
AštuonerybėNaujausi pakeitimai 网站 Įvadas #E9F5FC Klausimai #FFFFC0 Teiginiai #FFFFFF Kitų mintys #EFCFE1 Dievas man #FFECC0 Iš ankščiau #CCFFCC Mieli skaitytojai, visa mano kūryba ir kartu visi šie puslapiai yra visuomenės turtas, kuriuo visi kviečiami laisvai naudotis, dalintis, visaip perkurti. - Andrius |
Puslapis paskutinį kartą pakeistas 2023 rugsėjo 19 d., 14:22
|