Mintys.Apibrėžimas istorijaPaslėpti nežymius pakeitimus - Rodyti kodo pakeitimus 2022 balandžio 26 d., 17:08
atliko -
Pridėtos 174-192 eilutės:
Apibrėžtumas Apibrėžtumu iškyla
2022 balandžio 20 d., 11:41
atliko -
Pridėta 40 eilutė:
2022 kovo 19 d., 20:53
atliko -
Pakeistos 31-32 eilutės iš
į:
Pakeistos 38-40 eilutės iš
į:
Pridėtos 88-89 eilutės:
Suvokiamumas
Pridėtos 92-93 eilutės:
Ištrintos 96-97 eilutės:
Kas yra apibrėžtumas Pakeistos 181-182 eilutės iš
How might we best define concepts, ideas, structures and such? Structure is relevant for making definitions. į:
Sandara svarbi apibrėžimams. Pakeista 204 eilutė iš:
į:
Ištrintos 206-207 eilutės:
2022 kovo 18 d., 10:42
atliko -
Pakeistos 22-24 eilutės iš
į:
Pridėta 31 eilutė:
2022 vasario 17 d., 22:37
atliko -
Pridėta 18 eilutė:
2022 vasario 17 d., 22:25
atliko -
Pakeistos 3-4 eilutės iš
Neapibrėžtumas, Apimtys, Žinojimas, Požiūrių sudūrimas, Tiesa, Suvestinė, Apimtys, Požiūriai, Helmut Leitner, riba, ribota, neribota, laisvė, pirmyn, atgal, žvilgsnis, išėjimas už savęs, išskyrimas, deterministinis, miglota, Algebra of Distinguishability. į:
Neapibrėžtumas, Gyvenimo lygtis, Apimtys, Žinojimas, Požiūrių sudūrimas, Tiesa, Suvestinė, Apimtys, Požiūriai, Helmut Leitner, riba, ribota, neribota, laisvė, pirmyn, atgal, žvilgsnis, išėjimas už savęs, išskyrimas, deterministinis, miglota, Algebra of Distinguishability. Pridėta 11 eilutė:
Kas yra apibrėžimas? Ištrintos 12-13 eilutės:
Ištrinta 13 eilutė:
Pakeistos 15-16 eilutės iš
į:
Apibrėžimo kilmė ir sąlygos
Kaip apibrėžiama?
Pakeistos 34-36 eilutės iš
į:
2021 lapkričio 24 d., 14:10
atliko -
Pridėtos 23-26 eilutės:
2021 rugsėjo 30 d., 16:17
atliko -
Pakeista 70 eilutė iš:
į:
2021 rugsėjo 30 d., 16:16
atliko -
Pridėtos 69-70 eilutės:
2021 rugsėjo 30 d., 14:30
atliko -
Pakeista 72 eilutė iš:
į:
2021 rugsėjo 18 d., 21:39
atliko -
Pridėtos 185-187 eilutės:
2021 rugsėjo 15 d., 12:11
atliko -
Pridėta 184 eilutė:
2021 rugsėjo 01 d., 15:09
atliko -
Pridėtos 178-183 eilutės:
Užrašai
2021 rugpjūčio 14 d., 19:26
atliko -
Pakeista 155 eilutė iš:
į:
2021 rugpjūčio 04 d., 15:03
atliko -
Pridėtos 18-19 eilutės:
Atskirtinumas-skirtingumas Pridėtos 21-22 eilutės:
2021 rugpjūčio 04 d., 15:00
atliko -
Pridėtos 65-66 eilutės:
2021 rugpjūčio 04 d., 14:57
atliko -
Pridėta 18 eilutė:
2021 birželio 05 d., 12:48
atliko -
Pakeistos 166-174 eilutės iš
In my diagrams I've found it helpful to use colors.
į:
2000 metais brėžiau man žinomų sandarų brėžinius. Jų žymes spalvinau
Pakeista 174 eilutė iš:
I'll try to share more about my own outlook. What I'm trying to do is counter to how we're conditioned to think. Hopefully, I can help myself and others grow in our thinking. This means that I will diverge from how we usually think, and also, that I want, at some point, to relate to how we usually think, so that I and others might grow beyond that. This means that we'll give up how we usually think, or at least, expand beyond it, which is to say, give up on the restrictions that we place on our thinking. į:
What I'm trying to do is counter to how we're conditioned to think. Hopefully, I can help myself and others grow in our thinking. This means that I will diverge from how we usually think, and also, that I want, at some point, to relate to how we usually think, so that I and others might grow beyond that. This means that we'll give up how we usually think, or at least, expand beyond it, which is to say, give up on the restrictions that we place on our thinking. 2021 birželio 05 d., 12:33
atliko -
Pakeistos 137-143 eilutės iš
Definitions are at the heart of the quest to Know Everything. To know is to have a definite scope. The Foursome is the structure that makes definite, that yields the truth of concepts. To know everything is perhaps to have the view of the indefinite of the definite. Definitions are complete only when there is an Observer. (RaimundasVaitkevicius) į:
Apibrėžimai yra esmė mano užmojo viską žinoti. Žinoti, tai turėti apibrėžtą apimtį. Ketverybė apibrėžia, tad išgauna sąvokų tiesą. Žinoti viską tai turėti neapibrėžtojo požiūrį į apibrėžtąjį. Apibrėžimai yra išbaigti kai jie apima stebėtoją. (RaimundasVaitkevicius) 2021 birželio 05 d., 12:05
atliko -
Pakeista 8 eilutė iš:
定义 ..... דעפֿיניציע į:
定义 ..... דעפֿיניציע 2021 birželio 05 d., 12:04
atliko -
Pakeista 8 eilutė iš:
定义 ..... דעפֿיניציע į:
定义 ..... דעפֿיניציע 2021 birželio 05 d., 12:04
atliko -
Pakeista 3 eilutė iš:
Žr. Apimtys, Žinojimas, Požiūrių sudūrimas, Tiesa, Suvestinė, Apimtys, Požiūriai, Helmut Leitner, riba, ribota, neribota, laisvė, pirmyn, atgal, žvilgsnis, išėjimas už savęs, išskyrimas, deterministinis, miglota, Algebra of Distinguishability. į:
Neapibrėžtumas, Apimtys, Žinojimas, Požiūrių sudūrimas, Tiesa, Suvestinė, Apimtys, Požiūriai, Helmut Leitner, riba, ribota, neribota, laisvė, pirmyn, atgal, žvilgsnis, išėjimas už savęs, išskyrimas, deterministinis, miglota, Algebra of Distinguishability. 2021 birželio 04 d., 16:17
atliko -
Pridėtos 66-74 eilutės:
Kas yra apibrėžtumas
Nulinis narys yra apibrėžimo pagrindas
Apibrėžtumas grindžia tarpinius lygmenis
2021 gegužės 25 d., 18:14
atliko -
Pridėta 11 eilutė:
Pridėtos 14-17 eilutės:
2021 sausio 20 d., 21:04
atliko -
Pakeista 3 eilutė iš:
Žr. Apimtys, Žinojimas, Požiūrių sudūrimas, Tiesa, Suvedimas?, Apimtys, Požiūriai, Helmut Leitner, riba, ribota, neribota, laisvė, pirmyn, atgal, žvilgsnis, išėjimas už savęs, išskyrimas, deterministinis, miglota, Algebra of Distinguishability. į:
Žr. Apimtys, Žinojimas, Požiūrių sudūrimas, Tiesa, Suvestinė, Apimtys, Požiūriai, Helmut Leitner, riba, ribota, neribota, laisvė, pirmyn, atgal, žvilgsnis, išėjimas už savęs, išskyrimas, deterministinis, miglota, Algebra of Distinguishability. 2021 sausio 13 d., 22:51
atliko -
Pakeista 143 eilutė iš:
į:
2021 sausio 13 d., 22:50
atliko -
Pakeista 143 eilutė iš:
į:
2021 sausio 13 d., 22:46
atliko -
Pakeistos 3-4 eilutės iš
Žr. Apimtys, Žinojimas, Kategorijų teorija, Požiūrių sudūrimas, Tiesa, Suvedimas?, Apimtys, Požiūriai, Helmut Leitner, riba, ribota, neribota, laisvė, pirmyn, atgal, žvilgsnis, išėjimas už savęs, išskyrimas, deterministinis, miglota, Algebra of Distinguishability. į:
Žr. Apimtys, Žinojimas, Požiūrių sudūrimas, Tiesa, Suvedimas?, Apimtys, Požiūriai, Helmut Leitner, riba, ribota, neribota, laisvė, pirmyn, atgal, žvilgsnis, išėjimas už savęs, išskyrimas, deterministinis, miglota, Algebra of Distinguishability. Pakeista 143 eilutė iš:
į:
2020 birželio 02 d., 14:40
atliko -
Pridėtos 7-12 eilutės:
定义 ..... דעפֿיניציע
2020 gegužės 15 d., 17:26
atliko -
Pridėtos 54-55 eilutės:
2019 gruodžio 12 d., 23:27
atliko -
Pridėtos 52-53 eilutės:
2019 spalio 17 d., 17:05
atliko -
Pridėtos 134-137 eilutės:
Apibrėžimo pavyzdžiai
2019 spalio 07 d., 21:55
atliko -
Pridėtos 41-42 eilutės:
Apimties turėjimas
2019 rugsėjo 12 d., 11:39
atliko -
Pakeistos 11-13 eilutės iš
Vienumo ir nevienumo nusakymas. į:
Nusakymas atitokėjimu.
Nusakymas vienumo ir nevienumo. 2019 rugsėjo 12 d., 11:37
atliko -
Pridėtos 11-13 eilutės:
Vienumo ir nevienumo nusakymas.
Ištrintos 40-41 eilutės:
Sąlyginis buvimas viena
2018 rugsėjo 13 d., 13:21
atliko -
Pakeista 18 eilutė iš:
į:
2018 rugsėjo 13 d., 13:21
atliko -
Pridėtos 1-2 eilutės:
Pakeistos 5-7 eilutės iš
į:
Kaip įmanoma apibrėžti pirmines sąvokas? Apibrėžimas yra: Dvasios ir sandaros porinis išsivystymas, išeinant už savęs, taip kad tiesa turinys atitinka raišką.
Pakeistos 16-29 eilutės iš
Apibrėžimas yra: Dvasios ir sandaros porinis išsivystymas, išeinant už savęs, taip kad tiesa turinys atitinka raišką.
į:
Pridėtos 113-117 eilutės:
Kas grindžia apibrėžimą?
2018 rugsėjo 13 d., 13:13
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
Žr. Apimtys, Žinojimas, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: Definite, Indefinite, IndefiniteVDefinite, Define, Overview, Truth, Freedom, Forwards, Backwards, View, Scope, Unlimited, Definition, GoingBeyondOneself, AlgebraOfViews į:
Žr. Apimtys, Žinojimas, Kategorijų teorija, Požiūrių sudūrimas, Tiesa, Suvedimas?, Apimtys, Požiūriai, Helmut Leitner, riba, ribota, neribota, laisvė, pirmyn, atgal, žvilgsnis, išėjimas už savęs, išskyrimas, deterministinis, miglota, Algebra of Distinguishability.
Pridėtos 17-20 eilutės:
Dvasios ir sandaros porinis išsivystymas, išeinant už savęs, taip kad tiesa turinys atitinka raišką.
Pridėtos 30-34 eilutės:
2018 rugsėjo 13 d., 12:49
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
Žr. Apimtys, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: Definite, Indefinite, IndefiniteVDefinite, Define, Overview, Truth, Freedom, Forwards, Backwards, View, Scope, Unlimited, Definition, GoingBeyondOneself, AlgebraOfViews į:
Žr. Apimtys, Žinojimas, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: Definite, Indefinite, IndefiniteVDefinite, Define, Overview, Truth, Freedom, Forwards, Backwards, View, Scope, Unlimited, Definition, GoingBeyondOneself, AlgebraOfViews Pridėtos 13-15 eilutės:
Ištrintos 26-27 eilutės:
2014 gruodžio 05 d., 13:39
atliko -
Pakeista 5 eilutė iš:
Išėjimas už savęs eigos nustatymas, tad apimties nustatymas į:
Išėjimo už savęs eigos nustatymas, tad apimties nustatymas 2014 gruodžio 05 d., 13:39
atliko -
Pakeistos 5-8 eilutės iš
Įtvirtinimas apimtyje - grounding in Scope į:
Išėjimas už savęs eigos nustatymas, tad apimties nustatymas
2014 gruodžio 05 d., 13:23
atliko -
Pakeista 1 eilutė iš:
Žr. Apimtis?, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: Definite, Indefinite, IndefiniteVDefinite, Define, Overview, Truth, Freedom, Forwards, Backwards, View, Scope, Unlimited, Definition, GoingBeyondOneself, AlgebraOfViews į:
Žr. Apimtys, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: Definite, Indefinite, IndefiniteVDefinite, Define, Overview, Truth, Freedom, Forwards, Backwards, View, Scope, Unlimited, Definition, GoingBeyondOneself, AlgebraOfViews 2014 birželio 27 d., 11:15
atliko -
Pakeistos 22-23 eilutės iš
į:
Pridėtos 26-35 eilutės:
Apibrėžtumas susijęs su žinojimu. Žinome apibrėžtumą, jo lygmenis. Apibrėžtumas reiškiasi keturiais žinojimo lygmenimis. Tačiau galime žinoti ir neapibrėžtumą, tai ko nežinome. Šis esminis skirtumas grindžia požiūrių grandinę kuria visos sandaros išsivysto. Žinau, kad nežinau, kad žinau... Indefinite and definite are the two Representations Of Slack, increasing and decreasing. Their scopes are the four Representations Of Everything: all, any, some, none. It is crucial which direction we are thinking about in defining things. Apibrėžtumas yra dangaus karalystės esmė - dieviškumo išgyvenimą žmogiškume. Pakeistos 78-83 eilutės iš
It is crucial which direction we are thinking about in defining things. Apibrėžtas ir neapibrėžtas požiūris į:
Definitions are at the heart of the quest to Know Everything. Pakeistos 87-98 eilutės iš
A View may have a Definite Scope or an Indefinite Scope, and thus is called either definite or indefinite. This is the distinction between a human view and God's view. It is the basis for TheChainOfViews by which all Structure is unfolded. Indefinite and definite are both important because Definition is at the heart of a quest to KnowEverything. Indefinite and definite are presumably the two RepresentationsOfSlack, increasing and decreasing. Their scopes are the four RepresentationsOfEverything: all, any, some, none. Neapibrėžtumas To take an unlimited view is to view the indefinite. It is God's View. Hence, in an indefinite view, distinctions and separations are themselves suppositions. į:
To know everything is perhaps to have the view of the indefinite of the definite. Ištrintos 90-96 eilutės:
Definitions are fundamental in the quest to Know Everything. To know everything is perhaps to have the view of the indefinite of the definite. Ištrintos 100-104 eilutės:
Define is GoingBeyondOneself, especially Theory going beyond itself into Scope The difference between deterministic and nondeterministic algorithms is relevant to the NPComplete problem. Pridėtos 132-133 eilutės:
The difference between deterministic and nondeterministic algorithms is relevant to the NPComplete problem. 2014 birželio 27 d., 10:59
atliko -
Pakeista 10 eilutė iš:
Sandaros išvystymas lygmenimis: į:
Sandaros išvystymas tiesos lygmenimis, apimtimis: Pridėtos 12-13 eilutės:
Sąlyginis buvimas viena Pakeistos 15-21 eilutės iš
į:
Apibrėžiama tai, kas už apimties, kas neviena - neigimu iškeliamas jo nevieningumas su tuo, kas apimtyje - tad svarstoma būtis, to kas už apimties Pridėtos 17-20 eilutės:
Ištrinta 21 eilutė:
2014 birželio 27 d., 10:40
atliko -
Pakeistos 3-5 eilutės iš
Apibrėžimas yra: į:
Apibrėžimas yra: Įtvirtinimas apimtyje - grounding in Scope Ištrintos 6-7 eilutės:
Pridėtos 10-15 eilutės:
Sandaros išvystymas lygmenimis:
2014 birželio 27 d., 10:31
atliko -
Ištrintos 17-26 eilutės:
Definitions are complete only when there is an Observer. (RaimundasVaitkevicius) Viską žinoti Definitions are fundamental in the quest to KnowEverything. To know everything is perhaps to have the view of the indefinite of the definite. Pakeistos 54-56 eilutės iš
į:
Pakeistos 66-88 eilutės iš
Kaip apibrėžiama Structure is relevant for making definitions. The complex is defined in terms of the simple. But how do we define the simple, the fundamentals, the primitives? A Division of Everything defines issues. A Topology is defined by way of a mind game. Apibrėžimo būdai How might we best define concepts, ideas, structures and such?
CategoryTheory is a tool for finding good definitions by thinking in terms of the morphisms that preserve Structure. į:
Apibrėžtas ir neapibrėžtas požiūris Pakeistos 70-80 eilutės iš
A definite view, a definite scope allows for the definite separation, distinction, of perspectives. Hence, in a definite view, distinctions and separations are themselves not suppositions, but are derivative. Also, a definite view allows for a change in scope, which is to say, opens up space for a quality, for the good. In this way, it shifts some of its responsibility onto the quality. ===What is Define?===
į:
A View may have a Definite Scope or an Indefinite Scope, and thus is called either definite or indefinite. This is the distinction between a human view and God's view. It is the basis for TheChainOfViews by which all Structure is unfolded. Indefinite and definite are both important because Definition is at the heart of a quest to KnowEverything. Indefinite and definite are presumably the two RepresentationsOfSlack, increasing and decreasing. Their scopes are the four RepresentationsOfEverything: all, any, some, none. Neapibrėžtumas To take an unlimited view is to view the indefinite. It is God's View. Hence, in an indefinite view, distinctions and separations are themselves suppositions. Definitions are complete only when there is an Observer. (RaimundasVaitkevicius) Definitions are fundamental in the quest to Know Everything. To know everything is perhaps to have the view of the indefinite of the definite. Apibrėžimo būdai How might we best define concepts, ideas, structures and such? Structure is relevant for making definitions.
Define is GoingBeyondOneself, especially Theory going beyond itself into Scope Ištrintos 133-154 eilutės:
Neapibrėžtumas To take an unlimited view is to view the indefinite. It is God's View. An indefinite view is the acceptance of an indefinite scope. This allows for the indefinite separation, distinction, of perspectives. Hence, in an indefinite view, distinctions and separations are themselves suppositions. An indefinite view does not allow for a change in scope. This means that it does not open up space for a quality, for the good. It takes sole responsibility for its suppositions. An indefinite view is one that leaves things hanging, allows them to be undefined for a while, or forever. It is an open ended view, one that looks Forwards. An indefinite, unlimited view is defined by what it goes into. Apibrėžtas ir neapibrėžtas požiūris A View may have a Definite Scope or an Indefinite Scope, and thus is called either definite or indefinite. This is the distinction between a human view and God's view. It is the basis for TheChainOfViews by which all Structure is unfolded. Indefinite and definite are both important because Definition is at the heart of a quest to KnowEverything. Indefinite and definite are presumably the two RepresentationsOfSlack, increasing and decreasing. Their scopes are the four RepresentationsOfEverything: all, any, some, none. 2014 birželio 27 d., 10:16
atliko - 2014 birželio 27 d., 10:16
atliko - 2014 birželio 27 d., 10:16
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
Žr. Apimtis?, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: Definite, Indefinite, IndefiniteVDefinite, Define, Overview, Truth, Freedom, Backwards, View, Scope, Unlimited, Definition, GoingBeyondOneself, AlgebraOfViews į:
Žr. Apimtis?, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: Definite, Indefinite, IndefiniteVDefinite, Define, Overview, Truth, Freedom, Forwards, Backwards, View, Scope, Unlimited, Definition, GoingBeyondOneself, AlgebraOfViews Pakeistos 103-108 eilutės iš
Deterministic See also: Definite, IndefiniteVDefinite A definite view is deterministic. į:
Pakeistos 117-120 eilutės iš
===Discussion=== Andrius: Helmut, thank you for bringing this up and pursuing this. I benefit from your point of view. į:
My use of words and terms Ištrintos 135-136 eilutės:
Helmut, I think your probing is helpful because it makes clear where I need to do more work! Thank you. Ištrintos 136-138 eilutės:
See also: Definite, Forwards, View, Scope, Unlimited 2014 birželio 27 d., 10:13
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
Žr. Apimtis?, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: Definite, Indefinite, IndefiniteVDefinite, Define, Overview, Truth, Freedom, Backwards, View, Scope, Unlimited, Definition, GoingBeyondOneself į:
Žr. Apimtis?, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: Definite, Indefinite, IndefiniteVDefinite, Define, Overview, Truth, Freedom, Backwards, View, Scope, Unlimited, Definition, GoingBeyondOneself, AlgebraOfViews Ištrintos 102-105 eilutės:
===AboutThisPage===
Ištrintos 161-163 eilutės:
See also: Indefinite, Definite, Define, Definition, Overview, AlgebraOfViews Pakeistos 168-170 eilutės iš
į:
What is it to define? 2014 birželio 27 d., 10:12
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
Žr. Apimtis?, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: Definite, Indefinite, IndefiniteVDefinite, Define, Overview, Truth, Freedom į:
Žr. Apimtis?, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: Definite, Indefinite, IndefiniteVDefinite, Define, Overview, Truth, Freedom, Backwards, View, Scope, Unlimited, Definition, GoingBeyondOneself Pakeistos 64-66 eilutės iš
į:
Pakeistos 91-102 eilutės iš
Apibrėžtas See also: IndefiniteVDefinite, Indefinite, Backwards, View, Scope, Unlimited, Overview, Definition The definite view is:
į:
Pakeistos 94-97 eilutės iš
An definite view is the acceptance of an definite scope. This allows for the definite separation, distinction, of perspectives. Hence, in a definite view, distinctions and separations are themselves not suppositions, but are derivative. į:
A definite view, a definite scope allows for the definite separation, distinction, of perspectives. Hence, in a definite view, distinctions and separations are themselves not suppositions, but are derivative. Ištrintos 97-101 eilutės:
A definite view is one that does not leave anything hanging. Everything is circumscribed. A definite, limited view is defined by what it comes from. See also: Definition, IndefiniteVDefinite, Indefinite, Definite, Overview, GoingBeyondOneself 2014 birželio 27 d., 10:07
atliko -
Pridėta 33 eilutė:
Pridėta 41 eilutė:
Pakeistos 46-47 eilutės iš
į:
Pridėta 49 eilutė:
Pakeistos 62-64 eilutės iš
į:
Pakeistos 191-220 eilutės iš
===Indefinite view=== An indefinite view is:
===Definite view=== A definite view is:
į:
2014 birželio 27 d., 10:00
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
Žr. Apimtis?, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: {{Definite}}, {{Indefinite}}, IndefiniteVDefinite, {{Define}}, Overview, Truth, Freedom į:
Žr. Apimtis?, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: Definite, Indefinite, IndefiniteVDefinite, Define, Overview, Truth, Freedom Pakeista 10 eilutė iš:
į:
Pakeistos 63-64 eilutės iš
{{Structure}} is relevant for making definitions. į:
Structure is relevant for making definitions. Pakeistos 67-71 eilutės iš
A {{Division}} of {{Everything}} defines issues. A {{Topology}} is defined by way of a mind game. į:
A Division of Everything defines issues. A Topology is defined by way of a mind game. Pakeista 78 eilutė iš:
į:
Pakeistos 81-82 eilutės iš
CategoryTheory is a tool for finding good definitions by thinking in terms of the morphisms that preserve {{Structure}}. į:
CategoryTheory is a tool for finding good definitions by thinking in terms of the morphisms that preserve Structure. Pakeista 85 eilutė iš:
See also: IndefiniteVDefinite, {{Indefinite}}, {{Backwards}}, {{View}}, {{Scope}}, {{Unlimited}}, {{Overview}}, {{Definition}} į:
See also: IndefiniteVDefinite, Indefinite, Backwards, View, Scope, Unlimited, Overview, Definition Pakeista 89 eilutė iš:
į:
Pakeistos 92-96 eilutės iš
To know is to have a definite scope. The {{Foursome}} is the structure that makes definite, that yields the truth of concepts. į:
To know is to have a definite scope. The Foursome is the structure that makes definite, that yields the truth of concepts. Pakeistos 107-108 eilutės iš
See also: {{Definition}}, IndefiniteVDefinite, {{Indefinite}}, {{Definite}}, Overview, GoingBeyondOneself į:
See also: Definition, IndefiniteVDefinite, Indefinite, Definite, Overview, GoingBeyondOneself Pakeistos 119-120 eilutės iš
See also: {{Definite}}, IndefiniteVDefinite į:
See also: Definite, IndefiniteVDefinite Pakeistos 137-138 eilutės iš
{{Andrius}}: Helmut, thank you for bringing this up and pursuing this. I benefit from your point of view. į:
Andrius: Helmut, thank you for bringing this up and pursuing this. I benefit from your point of view. Pakeistos 147-148 eilutės iš
For example, in working with categories (as Kant would call them), I realized that it was not helpful to think of them as abstractions of things that we imagine. In fact, they were quite the opposite - they were backdrops, canvases, worlds which our imagination provided so that we could place something in it and imagine it in such a context. For example, there is a metaphor love is a journey, and here journey brings to mind an entire abstract world that an abstract journey conjures. Typically, a thing (or a word) may have a definition that can be pulled together as a single, definitive statement. However, a world is not described by a single, definitive statement. Imagine living on a sphere, or a flat plane, or a line, or on a torus. Each of these worlds has its own geometry, its own properties locally and globally. In mathematics, such a world is described not by one definitive statement, but rather by a set of rules, and that set is typically not special. The same world can be described, determined by a variety of different rules, none of which can claim to be special. It is only the world itself that is special. In mathematics, this kind of world is often talked about as a topology. Another word that I could use is circumstances. What I'm trying to convey is that a concept like many is not an abstract thing but rather a world or circumstance that we project things upon. For example, in defining language as a mapping you're relying on the concept of many, that there can be parallel relationships. With the [{{Topologies}} #] I have found a way to rigorously define concepts such as many. į:
For example, in working with categories (as Kant would call them), I realized that it was not helpful to think of them as abstractions of things that we imagine. In fact, they were quite the opposite - they were backdrops, canvases, worlds which our imagination provided so that we could place something in it and imagine it in such a context. For example, there is a metaphor love is a journey, and here journey brings to mind an entire abstract world that an abstract journey conjures. Typically, a thing (or a word) may have a definition that can be pulled together as a single, definitive statement. However, a world is not described by a single, definitive statement. Imagine living on a sphere, or a flat plane, or a line, or on a torus. Each of these worlds has its own geometry, its own properties locally and globally. In mathematics, such a world is described not by one definitive statement, but rather by a set of rules, and that set is typically not special. The same world can be described, determined by a variety of different rules, none of which can claim to be special. It is only the world itself that is special. In mathematics, this kind of world is often talked about as a topology. Another word that I could use is circumstances. What I'm trying to convey is that a concept like many is not an abstract thing but rather a world or circumstance that we project things upon. For example, in defining language as a mapping you're relying on the concept of many, that there can be parallel relationships. With the [Topologies #] I have found a way to rigorously define concepts such as many. Pakeista 159 eilutė iš:
See also: {{Definite}}, {{Forwards}}, {{View}}, {{Scope}}, {{Unlimited}} į:
See also: Definite, Forwards, View, Scope, Unlimited Pakeistos 162-163 eilutės iš
To take an unlimited view is to view the indefinite. It is {{God}}'s {{View}}. į:
To take an unlimited view is to view the indefinite. It is God's View. Pakeistos 170-171 eilutės iš
An indefinite view is one that leaves things hanging, allows them to be undefined for a while, or forever. It is an open ended view, one that looks {{Forwards}}. į:
An indefinite view is one that leaves things hanging, allows them to be undefined for a while, or forever. It is an open ended view, one that looks Forwards. Pakeista 176 eilutė iš:
See also: {{Indefinite}}, {{Definite}}, {{Define}}, {{Definition}}, {{Overview}}, AlgebraOfViews į:
See also: Indefinite, Definite, Define, Definition, Overview, AlgebraOfViews Pakeistos 179-182 eilutės iš
A {{View}} may have a {{Definite}} {{Scope}} or an {{Indefinite}} {{Scope}}, and thus is called either definite or indefinite. This is the distinction between a human view and God's view. It is the basis for TheChainOfViews by which all {{Structure}} is unfolded. Indefinite and definite are both important because {{Definition}} is at the heart of a quest to KnowEverything. į:
A View may have a Definite Scope or an Indefinite Scope, and thus is called either definite or indefinite. This is the distinction between a human view and God's view. It is the basis for TheChainOfViews by which all Structure is unfolded. Indefinite and definite are both important because Definition is at the heart of a quest to KnowEverything. Pakeista 190 eilutė iš:
į:
Pakeistos 194-195 eilutės iš
į:
Pakeista 205 eilutė iš:
į:
Pakeista 209 eilutė iš:
į:
Pakeista 214 eilutė iš:
į:
2014 birželio 27 d., 09:59
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
Žr. Helmut Leitner See also: {{Definite}}, {{Indefinite}}, IndefiniteVDefinite, {{Define}}, Overview, Truth, Freedom į:
Žr. Apimtis?, Kategorijų teorija, Helmut Leitner See also: {{Definite}}, {{Indefinite}}, IndefiniteVDefinite, {{Define}}, Overview, Truth, Freedom Ištrintos 10-13 eilutės:
Definitions are complete only when there is an Observer. (RaimundasVaitkevicius) Definition Pakeistos 18-19 eilutės iš
===KnowEverything=== į:
Definitions are complete only when there is an Observer. (RaimundasVaitkevicius) Viską žinoti Pakeistos 61-62 eilutės iš
===How are definitions made?=== į:
Kaip apibrėžiama Pakeistos 71-76 eilutės iš
See also: CategoryTheory į:
Apibrėžimo būdai Pakeistos 76-82 eilutės iš
Complex concepts may be defined in terms of simpler ones, primitive ones. But how do we define primitive concepts? {{Divisions}}: The divisions of everything serve to define states of mind by presenting the outlooks that are relevant. Mind games: {{Topologies}} are defined by way of mind games. {{Operations}}: The structure of the divisions is also given by operations +1, +2, +3. į:
2014 birželio 27 d., 09:57
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
See also: {{Definite}}, {{Indefinite}}, IndefiniteVDefinite, {{Define}}, Overview, Truth, Freedom į:
Žr. Helmut Leitner See also: {{Definite}}, {{Indefinite}}, IndefiniteVDefinite, {{Define}}, Overview, Truth, Freedom Ištrintos 140-185 eilutės:
Discussion with Helmut Leitner on "everyday language" GOS redefines a number of words, which may create problems for people to understand GOS. To talk about this, we need a notation. To solve this, we either need a good understanding of all these languageel issues or otherwise it might make sense to change GOS terminology by using other terms or even by inventing new terms. Notation in test:
Considered alternatives:
===Topology=== topologygos unequal topologyel. To do. [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Topology.html MathWorld's definition of Topology]: Topology is the mathematical study of the properties that are preserved through deformations, twistings, and stretchings of objects. Tearing, however, is not allowed... The "objects" of topology are often formally defined as topological spaces... There is also a formal definition for a topology defined in terms of set operations. A set X along with a collection T of subsets of it is said to be a topology if the subsets in T obey the following properties: 1. The (trivial) subsets X and the empty set are in T. 2. Whenever sets A and B are in T, then so is A intersection B. 3. Whenever two or more sets are in T, then so is their union ===Perspective=== perspectivegos unequal perspectiveel. perspectiveel: Typically perspectiveel depend on a certain viewpoint and is unique. A perspectiveel can't contain other perspectivesel. You have to add a dimension to contain perspectives. A coordinate system can be used to map, understand, calculate and contain other perspectivesel. To do. ===Language=== languagegos unequal languageel. languageel: A languageel is a mapping of ideal things (words, symbols) to perceived real things (objects, properties, ideas). languagegos: I do not yet understand what languagegos means, but it is quite different. To do. [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FormalLanguage.html MathWorld's definition of Formal Language]: In mathematics, a formal language is normally defined by an alphabet and formation rules. The alphabet of a formal language is a set of symbols on which this language is built. Some of the symbols in an alphabet may have a special meaning. The formation rules specify which strings of symbols count as well-formed. The well-formed strings of symbols are also called words, expressions, formulas, or terms. The formation rules are usually recursive. Some rules postulate that such and such expressions belong to the language in question. Some other rules establish how to build well-formed expressions from other expressions belonging to the language. It is assumed that nothing else is a well-formed expression. For example, the language of propositional calculus could be defined as follows.... 2014 birželio 26 d., 13:04
atliko -
Pakeista 32 eilutė iš:
į:
Pakeistos 35-46 eilutės iš
The unlimited view is the one for which "all statements are true" - I suppose it is the (supposed) point which goes beyond into all perspectives.
į:
It is crucial which direction we are thinking about in defining things. 2014 birželio 26 d., 12:52
atliko -
Pakeistos 3-6 eilutės iš
===What is a definition?=== Definition is: į:
Apibrėžimas yra: Pakeistos 28-30 eilutės iš
===IndefiniteVDefinite=== An Indefinite view is one in which all suppositions are true, whereas a Definite view is one in which all suppositions are either true or false. A {{View}} is an outlook or model. į:
Neapibrėžtas žvilgsnis ir apibrėžtas žvilgsnis
The unlimited view is the one for which "all statements are true" - I suppose it is the (supposed) point which goes beyond into all perspectives.
2014 birželio 02 d., 11:09
atliko -
Pakeistos 198-240 eilutės iš
An indefinite, unlimited view is defined by what it goes into. į:
An indefinite, unlimited view is defined by what it goes into. Apibrėžtas ir neapibrėžtas požiūris See also: {{Indefinite}}, {{Definite}}, {{Define}}, {{Definition}}, {{Overview}}, AlgebraOfViews A {{View}} may have a {{Definite}} {{Scope}} or an {{Indefinite}} {{Scope}}, and thus is called either definite or indefinite. This is the distinction between a human view and God's view. It is the basis for TheChainOfViews by which all {{Structure}} is unfolded. Indefinite and definite are both important because {{Definition}} is at the heart of a quest to KnowEverything. Indefinite and definite are presumably the two RepresentationsOfSlack, increasing and decreasing. Their scopes are the four RepresentationsOfEverything: all, any, some, none. ===Indefinite view=== An indefinite view is:
===Definite view=== A definite view is:
2014 birželio 02 d., 11:08
atliko -
Pakeistos 181-198 eilutės iš
Helmut, I think your probing is helpful because it makes clear where I need to do more work! Thank you. į:
Helmut, I think your probing is helpful because it makes clear where I need to do more work! Thank you. Neapibrėžtumas See also: {{Definite}}, {{Forwards}}, {{View}}, {{Scope}}, {{Unlimited}} To take an unlimited view is to view the indefinite. It is {{God}}'s {{View}}. An indefinite view is the acceptance of an indefinite scope. This allows for the indefinite separation, distinction, of perspectives. Hence, in an indefinite view, distinctions and separations are themselves suppositions. An indefinite view does not allow for a change in scope. This means that it does not open up space for a quality, for the good. It takes sole responsibility for its suppositions. An indefinite view is one that leaves things hanging, allows them to be undefined for a while, or forever. It is an open ended view, one that looks {{Forwards}}. An indefinite, unlimited view is defined by what it goes into. 2014 gegužės 19 d., 15:49
atliko -
Pakeistos 112-181 eilutės iš
į:
Discussion with Helmut Leitner on "everyday language" GOS redefines a number of words, which may create problems for people to understand GOS. To talk about this, we need a notation. To solve this, we either need a good understanding of all these languageel issues or otherwise it might make sense to change GOS terminology by using other terms or even by inventing new terms. Notation in test:
Considered alternatives:
===Topology=== topologygos unequal topologyel. To do. [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Topology.html MathWorld's definition of Topology]: Topology is the mathematical study of the properties that are preserved through deformations, twistings, and stretchings of objects. Tearing, however, is not allowed... The "objects" of topology are often formally defined as topological spaces... There is also a formal definition for a topology defined in terms of set operations. A set X along with a collection T of subsets of it is said to be a topology if the subsets in T obey the following properties: 1. The (trivial) subsets X and the empty set are in T. 2. Whenever sets A and B are in T, then so is A intersection B. 3. Whenever two or more sets are in T, then so is their union ===Perspective=== perspectivegos unequal perspectiveel. perspectiveel: Typically perspectiveel depend on a certain viewpoint and is unique. A perspectiveel can't contain other perspectivesel. You have to add a dimension to contain perspectives. A coordinate system can be used to map, understand, calculate and contain other perspectivesel. To do. ===Language=== languagegos unequal languageel. languageel: A languageel is a mapping of ideal things (words, symbols) to perceived real things (objects, properties, ideas). languagegos: I do not yet understand what languagegos means, but it is quite different. To do. [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FormalLanguage.html MathWorld's definition of Formal Language]: In mathematics, a formal language is normally defined by an alphabet and formation rules. The alphabet of a formal language is a set of symbols on which this language is built. Some of the symbols in an alphabet may have a special meaning. The formation rules specify which strings of symbols count as well-formed. The well-formed strings of symbols are also called words, expressions, formulas, or terms. The formation rules are usually recursive. Some rules postulate that such and such expressions belong to the language in question. Some other rules establish how to build well-formed expressions from other expressions belonging to the language. It is assumed that nothing else is a well-formed expression. For example, the language of propositional calculus could be defined as follows.... ===Discussion=== {{Andrius}}: Helmut, thank you for bringing this up and pursuing this. I benefit from your point of view. I'll try to share more about my own outlook. What I'm trying to do is counter to how we're conditioned to think. Hopefully, I can help myself and others grow in our thinking. This means that I will diverge from how we usually think, and also, that I want, at some point, to relate to how we usually think, so that I and others might grow beyond that. This means that we'll give up how we usually think, or at least, expand beyond it, which is to say, give up on the restrictions that we place on our thinking. For example, many people believe that it's not possible to think without words. Words do offer many advantages. However, we would not want to say that the deaf do not think, or that infants do not think. My work shows, at least to me, that it is possible to think in terms of concepts. For example, I can think the concept everything without making use of any particular word. I can think it because I can consider, intuit, reflect on its structural properties. This kind of thinking is much deeper than the manipulation or leveraging of words. Furthermore, I find evidence that concepts are universal and absolute, whereas words are quite unreliable and by nature have many meanings. So I think it's important to focus on the underlying concepts and not place too much weight on the names for these concepts. Words or names are important as markers that we can manipulate. Sometimes I use abstract symbols, for example, I may refer to the levels of the foursome as +0, +1, +2, +3 or to the perspectives of the twosome as ! and ?. However, such symbols tend to be loaded with meaning at some point and in some way, and so we do not escape the question, what connotations to include in the name. Some terms I invent, especially if they are for original concepts, especially for the abstract structures that I uncover, for example: nullsome, onesome, twosome, threesome, foursome, etc. Although even here I use names that extend the meaning of existing words. Generally, I try to find the simplest, most familiar and understandable terms that capture the relevant intuition, but I give them an additional, often formal meaning. This approach is very common in mathematics, physics and the sciences. For example, the word or in everyday language is a bit vague, but tends to mean either... or... but not both, whereas in mathematics A or B means anything that is in at least one of A or B (or, in everday language, we might say for this A and/or B). Similarly, physics has taken everyday words such as force, mass, power, time, energy and given them very precise meanings which are quite unexpected and even counterintuitive for those who know only the everday usage. Indeed, people often think that everyday usage is somehow definitive when actually it is a social construct, a folk theory. I try to express and ground concepts by way of structure, by way of their relationship with themselves, as then they do not depend on any larger context. That is why the divisions of everything are so central, because they are defined and described by the relationships between the perspectives, the parts which they organize. This is a great challenge, but I feel my efforts have been fruitful. I think of mathematics as the study of structure, and what I am doing is a sort of pre-mathematics, how structure arises out of concepts. Mathematics is important as a source of ideas. For this reason, I do draw on mathematics as a source of terms. For example, in working with categories (as Kant would call them), I realized that it was not helpful to think of them as abstractions of things that we imagine. In fact, they were quite the opposite - they were backdrops, canvases, worlds which our imagination provided so that we could place something in it and imagine it in such a context. For example, there is a metaphor love is a journey, and here journey brings to mind an entire abstract world that an abstract journey conjures. Typically, a thing (or a word) may have a definition that can be pulled together as a single, definitive statement. However, a world is not described by a single, definitive statement. Imagine living on a sphere, or a flat plane, or a line, or on a torus. Each of these worlds has its own geometry, its own properties locally and globally. In mathematics, such a world is described not by one definitive statement, but rather by a set of rules, and that set is typically not special. The same world can be described, determined by a variety of different rules, none of which can claim to be special. It is only the world itself that is special. In mathematics, this kind of world is often talked about as a topology. Another word that I could use is circumstances. What I'm trying to convey is that a concept like many is not an abstract thing but rather a world or circumstance that we project things upon. For example, in defining language as a mapping you're relying on the concept of many, that there can be parallel relationships. With the [{{Topologies}} #] I have found a way to rigorously define concepts such as many. Generally, what I'm trying to do is to find the existing words that best capture the intuition that I'm pointing to, and then extend, specialize, formalize their meaning further. Where possible I try to draw on everyday language. But I also extend terms from mathematics and other disciplines which themselves extend on the meanings of words from everyday life. This means that I can communicate to myself and others at least something of what I mean. And first of all, I am writing for myself, looking for terms which will help me capture my insights. Also, this is all a work-in-progress, which means that many of the underlying concepts are underdeveloped, murky. Progress is made by getting a clearer understanding of the underlying concepts. Thinking about the terms is helpful but ultimately the issue to solve is deeper. Yet truly it is exciting when ordinary everyday language can take on a deeper, more mature meaning. For example, the concepts whether, what, how and why are ancient. And yet we might come to understand that they are not accidental, that they express deep concepts. Helmut, I think your probing is helpful because it makes clear where I need to do more work! Thank you. 2014 gegužės 19 d., 15:06
atliko -
Pridėtos 104-112 eilutės:
Brėžiniai In my diagrams I've found it helpful to use colors.
2014 gegužės 19 d., 15:06
atliko -
Pridėtos 96-103 eilutės:
Deterministic See also: {{Definite}}, IndefiniteVDefinite A definite view is deterministic. The difference between deterministic and nondeterministic algorithms is relevant to the NPComplete problem. 2014 gegužės 16 d., 12:25
atliko -
Pakeistos 43-95 eilutės iš
A {{Topology}} is defined by way of a mind game. į:
A {{Topology}} is defined by way of a mind game. See also: CategoryTheory How might we best define concepts, ideas, structures and such? Complex concepts may be defined in terms of simpler ones, primitive ones. But how do we define primitive concepts? {{Divisions}}: The divisions of everything serve to define states of mind by presenting the outlooks that are relevant. Mind games: {{Topologies}} are defined by way of mind games. {{Operations}}: The structure of the divisions is also given by operations +1, +2, +3. CategoryTheory is a tool for finding good definitions by thinking in terms of the morphisms that preserve {{Structure}}. Apibrėžtas See also: IndefiniteVDefinite, {{Indefinite}}, {{Backwards}}, {{View}}, {{Scope}}, {{Unlimited}}, {{Overview}}, {{Definition}} The definite view is:
To know is to have a definite scope. The {{Foursome}} is the structure that makes definite, that yields the truth of concepts. An definite view is the acceptance of an definite scope. This allows for the definite separation, distinction, of perspectives. Hence, in a definite view, distinctions and separations are themselves not suppositions, but are derivative. Also, a definite view allows for a change in scope, which is to say, opens up space for a quality, for the good. In this way, it shifts some of its responsibility onto the quality. A definite view is one that does not leave anything hanging. Everything is circumscribed. A definite, limited view is defined by what it comes from. See also: {{Definition}}, IndefiniteVDefinite, {{Indefinite}}, {{Definite}}, Overview, GoingBeyondOneself ===What is Define?===
===AboutThisPage===
2014 gegužės 16 d., 12:23
atliko -
Pridėtos 1-43 eilutės:
See also: {{Definite}}, {{Indefinite}}, IndefiniteVDefinite, {{Define}}, Overview, Truth, Freedom ===What is a definition?=== Definition is:
Definitions are complete only when there is an Observer. (RaimundasVaitkevicius) Definition
===KnowEverything=== Definitions are fundamental in the quest to KnowEverything. To know everything is perhaps to have the view of the indefinite of the definite. ===IndefiniteVDefinite=== An Indefinite view is one in which all suppositions are true, whereas a Definite view is one in which all suppositions are either true or false. A {{View}} is an outlook or model. ===How are definitions made?=== {{Structure}} is relevant for making definitions. The complex is defined in terms of the simple. But how do we define the simple, the fundamentals, the primitives? A {{Division}} of {{Everything}} defines issues. A {{Topology}} is defined by way of a mind game. |
ApibrėžimasNaujausi pakeitimai 网站 Įvadas #E9F5FC Klausimai #FFFFC0 Teiginiai #FFFFFF Kitų mintys #EFCFE1 Dievas man #FFECC0 Iš ankščiau #CCFFCC Mieli skaitytojai, visa mano kūryba ir kartu visi šie puslapiai yra visuomenės turtas, kuriuo visi kviečiami laisvai naudotis, dalintis, visaip perkurti. - Andrius |
Puslapis paskutinį kartą pakeistas 2022 balandžio 26 d., 17:08
|