'''Kaip apimtys išreiškia išėjimo už savęs pakopas?

Žr. [[Atvaizdai]], [[Savastis]], [[Viskas]], [[Betkas]], [[Visaregis]], [[Dievo šokis]], [[Požiūriai]]

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive-Theoretic_Model_of_the_Universe from Wikipedia], ChristopherLangan: The CTMU treats the origin of reality in the context of freedom and constraint. Concepts are defined by constraints specifying their structure, and structure requires explanation. Consequently, Langan argues, the only concept not in need of structural explanation is the "terminal concept" with no constraints, and no structure to explain. In the CTMU, this "ontological groundstate" is called "Unbound Telesis" or UBT. Because UBT is a medium of pure potential, everything is possible within it, and this means that what can exist, does exist. However, the requirements for existence are, asserts Langan, more stringent than is normally supposed. Because UBT is unstructured, the only possibilities which can actualize from it are those with sufficient internal structure to create and configure themselves. So in the CTMU, reality, rather than being uncaused or externally caused, is self-caused, and constrained by the structure it needs to create and configure itself, that of SCSPL. The above reasoning, holds Langan, resolves the ex nihilo or "something-from-nothing" paradox. The paradox arises when "nothing" is taken to exclude not just "something", but the potential for "something". Because exclusion of potential is a constraint, "nothing" in this sense requires its own explanation, and cannot serve as an ontological groundstate. But when "nothing" is viewed as unconstrained potential or UBT, asserts Langan, reality arises inevitably from it.

Žr. [[Atvaizdai]], [[Savastis]], [[Viskas]], [[Betkas]],[[Visaregis]], [[Dievo šokis]], [[Požiūriai]]

Žr. [[Atvaizdai]], [[Savastis]], [[Viskas]], [[Betkas]], [[Niekas]], [[Visaregis]], [[Dievo šokis]], [[Požiūriai]]

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive-Theoretic_Model_of_the_Universe from Wikipedia], ChristopherLangan: The CTMU treats the origin of reality in the context of freedom and constraint. Concepts are defined by constraints specifying their structure, and structure requires explanation. Consequently, Langan argues, the only concept not in need of structural explanation is the "terminal concept" with no constraints, and no structure to explain. In the CTMU, this "ontological groundstate" is called "Unbound Telesis" or UBT. Because UBT is a medium of pure potential, everything is possible within it, and this means that what can exist, does exist. However, the requirements for existence are, asserts Langan, more stringent than is normally supposed. Because UBT is unstructured, the only possibilities which can actualize from it are those with sufficient internal structure to create and configure themselves. So in the CTMU, reality, rather than being uncaused or externally caused, is self-caused, and constrained by the structure it needs to create and configure itself, that of SCSPL. The above reasoning, holds Langan, resolves the ex nihilo or "something-from-nothing" paradox. The paradox arises when "nothing" is taken to exclude not just "something", but the potential for "something". Because exclusion of potential is a constraint, "nothing" in this sense requires its own explanation, and cannot serve as an ontological groundstate. But when "nothing" is viewed as unconstrained potential or UBT, asserts Langan, reality arises inevitably from it.

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive-Theoretic_Model_of_the_Universe from Wikipedia], ChristopherLangan: The CTMU treats the origin of reality in the context of freedom and constraint. Concepts are defined by constraints specifying their structure, and structure requires explanation. Consequently, Langan argues, the only concept not in need of structural explanation is the "terminal concept" with no constraints, and no structure to explain. In the CTMU, this "ontological groundstate" is called "Unbound Telesis" or UBT. Because UBT is a medium of pure potential, everything is possible within it, and this means that what can exist, does exist. However, the requirements for existence are, asserts Langan, more stringent than is normally supposed. Because UBT is unstructured, the only possibilities which can actualize from it are those with sufficient internal structure to create and configure themselves. So in the CTMU, reality, rather than being uncaused or externally caused, is self-caused, and constrained by the structure it needs to create and configure itself, that of SCSPL. The above reasoning, holds Langan, resolves the ex nihilo or "something-from-nothing" paradox. The paradox arises when "nothing" is taken to exclude not just "something", but the potential for "something". Because exclusion of potential is a constraint, "nothing" in this sense requires its own explanation, and cannot serve as an ontological groundstate. But when "nothing" is viewed as unconstrained potential or UBT, asserts Langan, reality arises inevitably from it.

>>bgcolor=#FFECC0<<

2004.11.12 A: Koks ryšys tarp sąmoningėjimo ir nulybės atvaizdų?

D: Aš galiu būti jumyse įvairiai, priklausomai nuo to kaip mes bendraujame.

2004.11.04 A: Koks nulybės atvaizdų ir trejybės atvaizdų vaidmuo tau susikalbant su mumis?

D: Mes žiūrime į vienas kitą iš šalies ir dalyvaujam tiesiogiai, tad atvaizdai tai sujungia.

>><<

>>bgcolor=#FFFFC0<<

''2004.12.13 A: Kaip keturi atvaizdai susiję su susikalbėjimu? D: Aš noriu būti su visais, būti vienas su jais, juos mylėti. Tad tai yra meilės sąlygos. A: Kaip suprasti, meilės sąlygos? D: Meilei reikia, kad galėtumėme gyventi vienas kitame. A: O ką tai reiškia? D: Išeiti iš savęs, ir iš savęs į kitą, ir iš kito į save, ir iš kito. A: Ačiū. D: Myliu.''

Žr. [[Atvaizdai]], [[Savastis]], [[Viskas]], [[Betkas]], [[Kažkas]], [[Niekas]], [[Visaregis]], [[Dievo šokis]], [[Požiūriai]]

Yra keturios apimtys: [[Viskas]], [[Betkas]], [[Kažkas]], [[Niekas]]. Jos yra keturios iš šešių atvaizdų. Tai yra Visko atvaizdai, užtat kartu ir nulybės, vienybės, dvejybės bei trejybės atvaizdai.

Yra keturios apimtys: [[Viskas]], [[Betkas]], [[Kažkas]], [[Niekas]]. Jos yra keturi iš šešių atvaizdai. Tai yra Visko atvaizdai, užtat ir nulybės, vienybės, dvejybės bei trejybės atvaizdai.

http://www.ms.lt/en/andrius/understanding/diagrams/scopes.jpg

Žr. [[Atvaizdai]], [[Viskas]], [[Betkas]], [[Kažkas]], [[Niekas]], [[Visaregis]], [[Dievo šokis]], [[Požiūriai]]

===Scope for parsers: outlook, talk, work, life===

[http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/304 May 31, 2003]

Žr. [[Viskas]], [[Betkas]], [[Kažkas]], [[Niekas]]. Žr.taip pat: ''Scope'', GoingBeyondOneself, Overview, Grounds, Scopes, Contexts, Representations, Everything, Anything, Something, Nothing, SpiritVStructure, Omniscope, Views

* what makes possible the disconnect of God from God and thus the relative ground.

* the amount of overlap between BeingOneWith and NotBeingOneWith (namely, Everything, Anything, Something, Nothing) and thus the degree to which BeingOneWith has gone beyond itself
*the relationship between Observer and ObservationalPlane, and especially, their coupling, the extent to which they determine each other

* the amount of Redundancy between the observer and the observational plane, which implies Slack

* where Aloneness ("Aloneness is God") is defined (yielding scope), whereas God ("God is alone") is undefined (beyond any scope) and simply expressed (within scope).
* the difference between human's view ''God is alone'' (as Person within who applies the definition of God) and God's view ''Aloneness is God'' (as God beyond to whom the definition of God is applied).
* the degree of Flow, thus the number of interruptions that the Flow allows for, as without interruption, what starts and ends are the same and the Flow is trivial.
* the extent of coinciding between God within and God beyond. This relationship is within.

Žr. [[Viskas]], [[Betkas]], [[Kažkas]], [[Niekas]]. Žr.taip pat: ''Scope'', GoingBeyondOneself, Overview, Grounds, Scopes, Contexts, Representations, Everything, Anything, Something, Nothing, SpiritVStructure

*our not being one with ourselves
*the removal of self

Apimtys yra skirtumai tarp tiesos turinio ir jos išraiškos. Keturi skirtumai - viskas, betkas, kažkas, niekas - Dievo požiūriu veiksmu [[IrVienas +1]] iškyla [[ketverybė | ketverybe]], tai tarpai tarp Dievo išeinančio iš už savęs ir Dievo išėjusio į save.

Apimtys yra skirtumai tarp tiesos turinio ir jos išraiškos. Keturi skirtumai - viskas, betkas, kažkas, niekas - Dievo požiūriu iškyla ketverybe, tai tarpai tarp Dievo išeinančio iš už savęs ir Dievo išėjusio į save.

Žr. [[Viskas]], [[Betkas]], [[Kažkas]], [[Niekas]]. Žr.taip pat: ''Scope'', GoingBeyondOneself, Overview, Grounds, {{Scopes}}, Contexts, {{Representations}}, {{Everything}}, {{Anything}}, {{Something}}, {{Nothing}}, SpiritVStructure

*the relationship between {{Observer}} and ObservationalPlane, and especially, their coupling, the extent to which they determine each other

* a '''{{Wishing}}''', a representation of everything. It is that which allows a view to be extended, hence allows for {{Suppositions}}.

{{Observer}} and ObservationalPlane are coupled. Scope is the amount of looseness or tightness in that coupling, so that they may or may not completely determine each other. One way to think of that coupling is to reinterpret the observer as an observational plane and then have them pull out and away from that plane, and consider what the two observers share with each other (and with the observational plane). They may share no perspective ({{Nothing}}), a perspective ({{Something}}), any perspective ({{Anything}}) or all perspectives ({{Everything}}). These

Scope therefore gives the amount of {{Redundancy}} between the observer and the observational plane, and implies {{Slack}}. This slack gives meaning to a variety of notions: {{Supposition}}, {{Concepts}}, {{Views}}, {{Perspectives}}, TakeUpAPerspective.

A {{Supposition}} is that which can be kept ''{{Separate}}'', which is to say, can be given a {{Scope}}.

{{Concepts}} are, as such, with regard to a {{Scope}} (all, any, a, none) wherein they are self-contained (the smaller the domain, the more they are self-contained, so there are fewer concepts).

{{Perspectives}} are, as such, with regard to a scope (all, any, a, none) wherein they are not-self-contained (the smaller the domain, the less they are not-self-contained, so there are more perspectives).

A {{View}} is the observational plane determined by an observer.

See: {{Scope}}, {{Representations}}, {{Omniscope}}, {{Views}}

See {{Scope}} for an explanation of what is scope.

===The four scopes: {{Everything}}, {{Anything}}, {{Something}}, {{Nothing}}===

When an {{Observer}} observes themselves, this relationship characterizes the ObservationalPlane between them. These are four scopes of access.

* If the observational plane coincides with both observer and observed, then they coincide, it lets through all perspectives, and is {{Everything}}
* If the observational plane coincides with the observer but not the observed, then it is a stepping in, and lets through any perspective, and is {{Anything}}
* If the observational plane coincides with the observed but not the observer, then it is a stepping out, and lets through a perspective, and is {{Something}}
* If the observational plane coincides with neither the observed nor the observer, then they are separate, it lets through no perspectives, and is {{Nothing}}

* If the observer coincides with the observational plane, then the plane is {{Unevaluated}}
* If the observer is separate from the observational plane, then the plane is {{Evaluated}}
* If the observed coincides with the observational plane, then the plane is {{Indefinite}}
* If the observed is separate from the observational plane, then the plane is {{Definite}}

We may also think of {{Indefinite}} as unbounded, {{Definite}} as bounded, {{Evaluated}} as closed, {{Unevaluated}} as open. Therefore:

* {{Everything}} is {{Unevaluated}} and {{Indefinite}}
* {{Anything}} is {{Unevaluated}} and {{Definite}}
* {{Something}} is {{Evaluated}} and {{Definite}}
* {{Nothing}} is {{Evaluated}} and {{Indefinite}}

Evaluated refers to the full or partial calculation that has taken place, as for a function. Evaluation is an obstacle to applying the {{Associative}} rule of CategoryTheory to the CompositionOfViews.

* {{Everything}} is the unlimited observer
* {{Anything}} is the limited observer
* {{Something}} is the limited observed
* {{Nothing}} is the unlimited observed

This is especially helpful in considering Christopher Alexander's PrinciplesOfLife, which is to say, the {{Topologies}}.

* {{Whole}} = all perspectives = {{Everything}}
* {{Part}} = any perspective = {{Anything}}
* {{Perspective}} = a perspective = {{Something}}
* {{Slack}} = no perspectives = {{Nothing}}

[[Viskas]], [[Betkas]], [[Kažkas]], [[Niekas]]

Attach:comparescopes.jpg

Attach:other.png

Attach:scopes.jpg

'''Scope'''

'''Extent'''

See also: GoingBeyondOneself, Overview, Grounds

Extent is what is not equal.

===AboutThisPage===

*PhilosophicalIdeas=Negating the null action is negating the grounds of God, thus God must be in the Extent.

'''Apimtys'''

See also: {{Scopes}}, Contexts, {{Representations}}, {{Everything}}, {{Anything}}, {{Something}}, {{Nothing}}, SpiritVStructure

===Scopes===

See {{Scopes}} for a discussion of the four scopes: {{Everything}}, {{Anything}}, {{Something}}, {{Nothing}}

===Questions===

Where do the four scopes (everything, anything, something, nothing) come from? I think that they are what is necessary for us to be able to have an observational plane, which is to say, to be able to clear everything away from it.

*PhilosophicalIdeas=Negating the null action is negating the grounds of God, thus God must be in the Extent.

Attach:scopes.jpg