Mintys.GyvybėsSavybės istorija
Rodyti nežymius pakeitimus - Rodyti galutinio teksto pakeitimus
2022 spalio 01 d., 11:55
atliko -
Pridėta 27 eilutė:
* padalinimų poslinkius-ašis
Pakeista 30 eilutė iš:
* pertvarkymus ir jų tikslus
į:
* pertvarkymus, jų poveikius ir tikslus
2022 spalio 01 d., 11:54
atliko -
Pakeista 25 eilutė iš:
Brėžinyje sulyginau
į:
Brėžinyje bandžiau sulyginti
Pakeistos 30-32 eilutės iš
* savo ir kitų nuostatas, veiksmus, mintis
į:
* savo ir kitų veiksmus, mintis, nuostatas
* širdies logiką ir pasaulio logiką
* Jėzaus logiką
* širdies logiką ir pasaulio logiką
* Jėzaus logiką
2022 spalio 01 d., 11:53
atliko -
Pakeistos 27-30 eilutės iš
* ženklų savybes
į:
* ženklų savybes
* telkėjus ir jų tikslus
* pertvarkymus ir jų tikslus
* savo ir kitų nuostatas, veiksmus, mintis
* telkėjus ir jų tikslus
* pertvarkymus ir jų tikslus
* savo ir kitų nuostatas, veiksmus, mintis
2022 spalio 01 d., 11:52
atliko -
Pakeista 9 eilutė iš:
* Building blocks - žemėlapynas
į:
* Aggregation - žemėlapynas
Pridėta 14 eilutė:
* Building blocks - lentelė
2022 spalio 01 d., 11:11
atliko -
Pakeista 15 eilutė iš:
į:
Telkėjai (organizing objects)
2022 spalio 01 d., 11:10
atliko -
2022 spalio 01 d., 11:10
atliko -
Pakeistos 3-6 eilutės iš
---------------------
%center%Attach:propertiesoflife.gif
----------------------------
%center%Attach:propertiesoflife.gif
----------------------------
į:
[+Gyvybės savybės - telkian
Pakeistos 18-26 eilutės iš
* The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
į:
* The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
---------------------
%center%Attach:propertiesoflife.gif
----------------------------
Brėžinyje sulyginau
* padalinimus
* ženklų savybes
---------------------
%center%Attach:propertiesoflife.gif
----------------------------
Brėžinyje sulyginau
* padalinimus
* ženklų savybes
2022 spalio 01 d., 10:48
atliko -
Pakeistos 17-26 eilutės iš
Each organizing
Living systems require the freedom for selection within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
į:
Organizing object
* Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.
* Living systems require the freedom for selection within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
* The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
* Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.
* Living systems require the freedom for selection within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
* The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
2022 spalio 01 d., 10:47
atliko -
Pakeistos 11-12 eilutės iš
* - žemėlapynas
* Building blocks
* Building blocks
į:
* Building blocks - žemėlapynas
Pakeista 13 eilutė iš:
*
į:
* Internal models - metraštis
Pridėtos 16-17 eilutės:
2022 spalio 01 d., 10:46
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
[[Savybės]], [[Gyvybė]], [[Gyvybės dėsniai]]
į:
[[Savybės]], [[Gyvybė]], [[Pertvarkymai]], [[Gyvybės dėsniai]]
Pridėtos 7-19 eilutės:
Gyvybės savybės aprašytos David Holland knygoje Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity.
Jas sulyginčiau su pertvarkymais:
* Diversity - raida
* - žemėlapynas
* Building blocks
* Nonlinearity - vadovėlis
* - metraštis
* Tags - žinynas
* Flows - kelionė
Jas sulyginčiau su pertvarkymais:
* Diversity - raida
* - žemėlapynas
* Building blocks
* Nonlinearity - vadovėlis
* - metraštis
* Tags - žinynas
* Flows - kelionė
Ištrintos 22-23 eilutės:
Taken from a book on complex systems by David Holland.
2022 spalio 01 d., 10:36
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-3 eilutės iš
Attach:propertiesoflife.
į:
[[Savybės]], [[Gyvybė]], [[Gyvybės dėsniai]]
---------------------
%center%Attach:propertiesoflife.gif
----------------------------
---------------------
%center%Attach:propertiesoflife.gif
----------------------------
2014 birželio 08 d., 07:04
atliko -
Pridėtos 10-11 eilutės:
The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
2014 birželio 08 d., 07:04
atliko -
Pridėtos 6-9 eilutės:
Living systems require the freedom for selection within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
Taken from a book on complex systems by David Holland.
2014 birželio 07 d., 10:46
atliko -
Ištrintos 4-141 eilutės:
----
{{Andrius}} [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/363 September 4, 2003]
I went through Christopher Alexander's "The Nature of Order" and his
fifteen principles of life.
I will describe them as the features by which "anything" may connect
itself with "everything" as centers of life, limited and unlimited.
-----------------------------------------------
We can think of "everything" and "anything" as players that wish to
link up with each other.
"Anything" plays through a trinity of roles: taking a stand,
following through, and reflecting. This cycle is the motor of our
life.
"Everything" plays by going beyond itself. It is the infinite
recursiveness of Why? It is the same recursiveness in the cycle of
our soul - taking a stand, following through, reflecting - which is
how we are conscious of everything.
Three of Alexander's properties of life describe this relationship
just as it is.
"take a stand" is in "strong centers" (made of other strong centers)
"follow through" is in "strong boundaries" (same order of magnitude
as centers. itself made up of boundaries)
"reflect" is in "levels of scale" (recursive nesting. regular size
jumps between scales)
Where is everything?
Here it is in the recursive nature, going ever deeper, inward, but
also, going back outward, farther than we may imagine.
We are limited, hence unable to conceive directly our connection, but
may only allude to it. Our conception is thus given not by this
infinite recursion, but through representations of everything.
Everything is represented in four ways, as true, direct, constant,
significant. Moreover, in its relationship with anything, it is
given as a player of a mind game which generates properties of life,
of the oneness of the spirit beyond and within structure, of
everything and anything.
-----------------------------------------------
"Significant" generates a mind game, where significant is that which
is unencompassable, can't be captured:
If thinking is significant, then so is being, for thoughts are
encompassed by the thinker. If being is significant, then so is
doing, for things are encompassed by the actions that manifest them.
If doing is significant, then so is thinking, for actions are
encompassed by the observations made of them.
where is the everything?
everything is identified with the relaxation of global centers to
allow for restatement through local centers.
"be" is in "not-separateness" (not apart from the world, lack of
separation from other centers, blending into them, supporting them,
fragmented boundary)
"do" is in "gradients" (slow variation of larger center makes for
gradient given by new centers)
"think" is in "roughness" (relaxation of global constraints so local
constraints can have priority)
-----------------------------------------------
"Constant" generates a mind game:
In searching for constancy, we find one example of constancy,
otherwise it is constantly unconstant. So the constancy is in
the "one" or in the "all". Note that to do this search, what we
select needs to be the same as what we judge, they are multiply
constant, "many".
where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which searches for centers,
perhaps finding one (and breaking symmetry) or not finding one (and
leaving symmetry) but especially in the regularity of the "many",
which blankets the entire space with centers.
"one" is in the "good shape" (as a shape, made of multiple coherent
centers, built from simple elemental structures, clear building
blocks with distinct symmetries. regularity allows for cross-
relationships, clear division of function, etc.)
"all" is in the "local symmetries" (default solution is symmetry, a
pre-filling of space)
"many" is in the "positive space" (every part is whole onto itself,
not leftover, has a strong center. all space useful, evenhanded
complements, no wasted space.)
-----------------------------------------------
"Direct" generates a mind game:
Our attention can be directed by something other than itself,
an "object". Subsequently, it can be directed by itself, this
is "process". Finally, it may or may not be directed, this
is "subject".
where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which gives attention to centers,
and especially, the subject, the ambiguity and interlock.
"object" is in the "contrast" (creation of differentiation,
acknowledgement of purposeful, meaningful centers)
"process" is in the "echoes" (repetition of motif at different
levels, same angles as building blocks, same process involved)
"subject" is in the "deep interlock and ambiguity" (center and its
complement enmeshed by shared and ambiguous subcenters)
-----------------------------------------------
"True" generates a mind game, where true is what can't be hidden, is
obvious:
The content and what reveals it may be the same, in which case it
is "necessarily" true. Otherwise, the content may be different from
what reveals it, and follows it, so is "actually" true. Finally,
what may be true is the relationship between the content and what
reveals it, which is "possibly" true.
where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which serves as the center, and
especially the void, what is possible.
"necessary" is in the "simplicity and inner calm" (unnecessary is
taken away, freely focused on function. slow)
"actual" is in the "alternating repetition" (intensified by
counterpoint of systems. continually engages the eye, recurring
action, space repeats, oscillation)
"possible" is in the "void" (solid contrast to the clutter that
surrounds it, connects with infinite void, brings life to mass of
small centers)
2014 birželio 07 d., 10:45
atliko -
Pakeistos 3-142 eilutės iš
Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.
į:
Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.
See also: PrinciplesOfLife, {{Topologies}}, {{Anything}}, {{Everything}}, EverythingVAnything, FifteenPropertiesOfLife
----
{{Andrius}} [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/363 September 4, 2003]
I went through Christopher Alexander's "The Nature of Order" and his
fifteen principles of life.
I will describe them as the features by which "anything" may connect
itself with "everything" as centers of life, limited and unlimited.
-----------------------------------------------
We can think of "everything" and "anything" as players that wish to
link up with each other.
"Anything" plays through a trinity of roles: taking a stand,
following through, and reflecting. This cycle is the motor of our
life.
"Everything" plays by going beyond itself. It is the infinite
recursiveness of Why? It is the same recursiveness in the cycle of
our soul - taking a stand, following through, reflecting - which is
how we are conscious of everything.
Three of Alexander's properties of life describe this relationship
just as it is.
"take a stand" is in "strong centers" (made of other strong centers)
"follow through" is in "strong boundaries" (same order of magnitude
as centers. itself made up of boundaries)
"reflect" is in "levels of scale" (recursive nesting. regular size
jumps between scales)
Where is everything?
Here it is in the recursive nature, going ever deeper, inward, but
also, going back outward, farther than we may imagine.
We are limited, hence unable to conceive directly our connection, but
may only allude to it. Our conception is thus given not by this
infinite recursion, but through representations of everything.
Everything is represented in four ways, as true, direct, constant,
significant. Moreover, in its relationship with anything, it is
given as a player of a mind game which generates properties of life,
of the oneness of the spirit beyond and within structure, of
everything and anything.
-----------------------------------------------
"Significant" generates a mind game, where significant is that which
is unencompassable, can't be captured:
If thinking is significant, then so is being, for thoughts are
encompassed by the thinker. If being is significant, then so is
doing, for things are encompassed by the actions that manifest them.
If doing is significant, then so is thinking, for actions are
encompassed by the observations made of them.
where is the everything?
everything is identified with the relaxation of global centers to
allow for restatement through local centers.
"be" is in "not-separateness" (not apart from the world, lack of
separation from other centers, blending into them, supporting them,
fragmented boundary)
"do" is in "gradients" (slow variation of larger center makes for
gradient given by new centers)
"think" is in "roughness" (relaxation of global constraints so local
constraints can have priority)
-----------------------------------------------
"Constant" generates a mind game:
In searching for constancy, we find one example of constancy,
otherwise it is constantly unconstant. So the constancy is in
the "one" or in the "all". Note that to do this search, what we
select needs to be the same as what we judge, they are multiply
constant, "many".
where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which searches for centers,
perhaps finding one (and breaking symmetry) or not finding one (and
leaving symmetry) but especially in the regularity of the "many",
which blankets the entire space with centers.
"one" is in the "good shape" (as a shape, made of multiple coherent
centers, built from simple elemental structures, clear building
blocks with distinct symmetries. regularity allows for cross-
relationships, clear division of function, etc.)
"all" is in the "local symmetries" (default solution is symmetry, a
pre-filling of space)
"many" is in the "positive space" (every part is whole onto itself,
not leftover, has a strong center. all space useful, evenhanded
complements, no wasted space.)
-----------------------------------------------
"Direct" generates a mind game:
Our attention can be directed by something other than itself,
an "object". Subsequently, it can be directed by itself, this
is "process". Finally, it may or may not be directed, this
is "subject".
where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which gives attention to centers,
and especially, the subject, the ambiguity and interlock.
"object" is in the "contrast" (creation of differentiation,
acknowledgement of purposeful, meaningful centers)
"process" is in the "echoes" (repetition of motif at different
levels, same angles as building blocks, same process involved)
"subject" is in the "deep interlock and ambiguity" (center and its
complement enmeshed by shared and ambiguous subcenters)
-----------------------------------------------
"True" generates a mind game, where true is what can't be hidden, is
obvious:
The content and what reveals it may be the same, in which case it
is "necessarily" true. Otherwise, the content may be different from
what reveals it, and follows it, so is "actually" true. Finally,
what may be true is the relationship between the content and what
reveals it, which is "possibly" true.
where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which serves as the center, and
especially the void, what is possible.
"necessary" is in the "simplicity and inner calm" (unnecessary is
taken away, freely focused on function. slow)
"actual" is in the "alternating repetition" (intensified by
counterpoint of systems. continually engages the eye, recurring
action, space repeats, oscillation)
"possible" is in the "void" (solid contrast to the clutter that
surrounds it, connects with infinite void, brings life to mass of
small centers)
See also: PrinciplesOfLife, {{Topologies}}, {{Anything}}, {{Everything}}, EverythingVAnything, FifteenPropertiesOfLife
----
{{Andrius}} [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/363 September 4, 2003]
I went through Christopher Alexander's "The Nature of Order" and his
fifteen principles of life.
I will describe them as the features by which "anything" may connect
itself with "everything" as centers of life, limited and unlimited.
-----------------------------------------------
We can think of "everything" and "anything" as players that wish to
link up with each other.
"Anything" plays through a trinity of roles: taking a stand,
following through, and reflecting. This cycle is the motor of our
life.
"Everything" plays by going beyond itself. It is the infinite
recursiveness of Why? It is the same recursiveness in the cycle of
our soul - taking a stand, following through, reflecting - which is
how we are conscious of everything.
Three of Alexander's properties of life describe this relationship
just as it is.
"take a stand" is in "strong centers" (made of other strong centers)
"follow through" is in "strong boundaries" (same order of magnitude
as centers. itself made up of boundaries)
"reflect" is in "levels of scale" (recursive nesting. regular size
jumps between scales)
Where is everything?
Here it is in the recursive nature, going ever deeper, inward, but
also, going back outward, farther than we may imagine.
We are limited, hence unable to conceive directly our connection, but
may only allude to it. Our conception is thus given not by this
infinite recursion, but through representations of everything.
Everything is represented in four ways, as true, direct, constant,
significant. Moreover, in its relationship with anything, it is
given as a player of a mind game which generates properties of life,
of the oneness of the spirit beyond and within structure, of
everything and anything.
-----------------------------------------------
"Significant" generates a mind game, where significant is that which
is unencompassable, can't be captured:
If thinking is significant, then so is being, for thoughts are
encompassed by the thinker. If being is significant, then so is
doing, for things are encompassed by the actions that manifest them.
If doing is significant, then so is thinking, for actions are
encompassed by the observations made of them.
where is the everything?
everything is identified with the relaxation of global centers to
allow for restatement through local centers.
"be" is in "not-separateness" (not apart from the world, lack of
separation from other centers, blending into them, supporting them,
fragmented boundary)
"do" is in "gradients" (slow variation of larger center makes for
gradient given by new centers)
"think" is in "roughness" (relaxation of global constraints so local
constraints can have priority)
-----------------------------------------------
"Constant" generates a mind game:
In searching for constancy, we find one example of constancy,
otherwise it is constantly unconstant. So the constancy is in
the "one" or in the "all". Note that to do this search, what we
select needs to be the same as what we judge, they are multiply
constant, "many".
where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which searches for centers,
perhaps finding one (and breaking symmetry) or not finding one (and
leaving symmetry) but especially in the regularity of the "many",
which blankets the entire space with centers.
"one" is in the "good shape" (as a shape, made of multiple coherent
centers, built from simple elemental structures, clear building
blocks with distinct symmetries. regularity allows for cross-
relationships, clear division of function, etc.)
"all" is in the "local symmetries" (default solution is symmetry, a
pre-filling of space)
"many" is in the "positive space" (every part is whole onto itself,
not leftover, has a strong center. all space useful, evenhanded
complements, no wasted space.)
-----------------------------------------------
"Direct" generates a mind game:
Our attention can be directed by something other than itself,
an "object". Subsequently, it can be directed by itself, this
is "process". Finally, it may or may not be directed, this
is "subject".
where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which gives attention to centers,
and especially, the subject, the ambiguity and interlock.
"object" is in the "contrast" (creation of differentiation,
acknowledgement of purposeful, meaningful centers)
"process" is in the "echoes" (repetition of motif at different
levels, same angles as building blocks, same process involved)
"subject" is in the "deep interlock and ambiguity" (center and its
complement enmeshed by shared and ambiguous subcenters)
-----------------------------------------------
"True" generates a mind game, where true is what can't be hidden, is
obvious:
The content and what reveals it may be the same, in which case it
is "necessarily" true. Otherwise, the content may be different from
what reveals it, and follows it, so is "actually" true. Finally,
what may be true is the relationship between the content and what
reveals it, which is "possibly" true.
where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which serves as the center, and
especially the void, what is possible.
"necessary" is in the "simplicity and inner calm" (unnecessary is
taken away, freely focused on function. slow)
"actual" is in the "alternating repetition" (intensified by
counterpoint of systems. continually engages the eye, recurring
action, space repeats, oscillation)
"possible" is in the "void" (solid contrast to the clutter that
surrounds it, connects with infinite void, brings life to mass of
small centers)
2014 birželio 06 d., 12:14
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-3 eilutės iš
Attach:propertiesoflife.gif
į:
Attach:propertiesoflife.gif
Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.
Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.
GyvybėsSavybės
Naujausi pakeitimai
网站
Įvadas #E9F5FC
Klausimai #FFFFC0
Teiginiai #FFFFFF
Kitų mintys #EFCFE1
Dievas man #FFECC0
Iš ankščiau #CCFFCC
Mieli skaitytojai, visa mano kūryba ir kartu visi šie puslapiai yra visuomenės turtas, kuriuo visi kviečiami laisvai naudotis, dalintis, visaip perkurti. - Andrius