Mintys.Vienybė istorija
Paslėpti nežymius pakeitimus - Rodyti galutinio teksto pakeitimus
2021 sausio 14 d., 22:07
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-8 eilutės iš
į:
>>bgcolor=#E9F5FC<<
--------------------
[[Viena]], [[Viskas]], [[Padalinimai]]
'''Kaip nusakyti vienybę?'''
--------------------
>><<
--------------------
[[Viena]], [[Viskas]], [[Padalinimai]]
'''Kaip nusakyti vienybę?'''
--------------------
>><<
2018 rugpjūčio 11 d., 07:46
atliko -
Pakeistos 7-8 eilutės iš
į:
This structure defines issues of order. The onesome has four representations, which are the properties of everything: +3) no external context, +2) simplest algorithm: accepts all things, +1) no internal structure, +0) required concept. [3/00, Andrius Kulikauskas]
Pridėtos 17-18 eilutės:
* Vienybė - viskas rieda į vieną tašką - į esmę.
2018 kovo 26 d., 09:38
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
Žr.[[Viena]], [[Viskas]]
į:
Žr.[[Viena]], [[Viskas]], [[Padalinimai]]
Pridėtos 5-12 eilutės:
Vienybė yra visko padalinimas į vieną požiūrį.
his structure defines issues of order. The onesome has four representations, which are the properties of everything: +3) no external context, +2) simplest algorithm: accepts all things, +1) no internal structure, +0) required concept. [3/00, Andrius Kulikauskas]
http://www.ms.lt/en/andrius/understanding/diagrams/onesome.gif
The onesome is the structure that arises when God takes up the question: How does it seem to me? God finds himself at the center. All is defined with regard to him. There is no way to define him. Whether he exists, or does not exist, does not matter, because he is the one who defines what they mean. With regard to him, they are all the same, and they all apply equally. In the mind of God, all things are true, he takes them literally. His state is that of contradiction in mathematics, where all statements are true, and which is prior to mathematics. I speak of "mind" and "state", but again, these are simply references to the onesome, or rather, to the everything, the structure of God.
his structure defines issues of order. The onesome has four representations, which are the properties of everything: +3) no external context, +2) simplest algorithm: accepts all things, +1) no internal structure, +0) required concept. [3/00, Andrius Kulikauskas]
http://www.ms.lt/en/andrius/understanding/diagrams/onesome.gif
The onesome is the structure that arises when God takes up the question: How does it seem to me? God finds himself at the center. All is defined with regard to him. There is no way to define him. Whether he exists, or does not exist, does not matter, because he is the one who defines what they mean. With regard to him, they are all the same, and they all apply equally. In the mind of God, all things are true, he takes them literally. His state is that of contradiction in mathematics, where all statements are true, and which is prior to mathematics. I speak of "mind" and "state", but again, these are simply references to the onesome, or rather, to the everything, the structure of God.
Ištrintos 16-22 eilutės:
>>bgcolor=#FFFFFF<<
The onesome is the [DivisionsOfEverything division of everything] into one perspective. This structure defines issues of order. The onesome has four representations, which are the properties of everything: +3) no external context, +2) simplest algorithm: accepts all things, +1) no internal structure, +0) required concept. [3/00, Andrius Kulikauskas]
http://www.ms.lt/en/andrius/understanding/diagrams/onesome.gif
The onesome is the structure that arises when God takes up the question: How does it seem to me? God finds himself at the center. All is defined with regard to him. There is no way to define him. Whether he exists, or does not exist, does not matter, because he is the one who defines what they mean. With regard to him, they are all the same, and they all apply equally. In the mind of God, all things are true, he takes them literally. His state is that of contradiction in mathematics, where all statements are true, and which is prior to mathematics. I speak of "mind" and "state", but again, these are simply references to the onesome, or rather, to the everything, the structure of God.
2018 kovo 26 d., 09:37
atliko -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
Žr.[[Vienumas]]
į:
Žr.[[Viena]], [[Viskas]]
Pridėtos 5-9 eilutės:
PropertyOfEverything
* is System
* is explicit
* expresses God's not being (or not) as a Scope
* is System
* is explicit
* expresses God's not being (or not) as a Scope
Pakeistos 21-28 eilutės iš
>>
See RepresentationsOfTheOnesome, {{Onesome}}, {{Everything}}
PropertyOfEverything
* is System
* is explicit
* expresses God's not being (or not) as a Scope
PropertyOfEverything
* is System
* is explicit
* expresses God's not being (or not) as a Scope
į:
>>bgcolor=#FFECC0<<
2018.03.23 A: Kaip [[vienybė]] ir jos atvaizdai išreiškia [[viena | vieningumą]]?
D: Vieningumas yra mano esmė, mano savybių pagrindas, jų pavidalas, kaip ir viskas yra mano sandara. Vienybės atvaizdų vieningumas yra tas pats viskas, neturintis aplinkos, juk į šią savybę įeina visos kitos visko savybės, užtat tai ir yra viskas, tai yra visko bruožas, užtat ir žinojimas visko yra žinojimas kodėl, būtent visų ryšių su visakuo. O tai yra esmė ir vieningumas, tad viskas išsako jo pavidalą, kaip ir aš, Dievas, išsakau jo dvasią, būtis išsako jo atvaizdus, ir įsitraukimas - dalyvavimas išsako jo esmę, tad trejybė ir yra pagrindas išvedimo ir pagrindas suvedimo.
>><<
2018.03.23 A: Kaip [[vienybė]] ir jos atvaizdai išreiškia [[viena | vieningumą]]?
D: Vieningumas yra mano esmė, mano savybių pagrindas, jų pavidalas, kaip ir viskas yra mano sandara. Vienybės atvaizdų vieningumas yra tas pats viskas, neturintis aplinkos, juk į šią savybę įeina visos kitos visko savybės, užtat tai ir yra viskas, tai yra visko bruožas, užtat ir žinojimas visko yra žinojimas kodėl, būtent visų ryšių su visakuo. O tai yra esmė ir vieningumas, tad viskas išsako jo pavidalą, kaip ir aš, Dievas, išsakau jo dvasią, būtis išsako jo atvaizdus, ir įsitraukimas - dalyvavimas išsako jo esmę, tad trejybė ir yra pagrindas išvedimo ir pagrindas suvedimo.
>><<
2015 vasario 23 d., 10:27
atliko -
Pakeista 15 eilutė iš:
[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendentals | Transcendentals]] The transcendentals (Latin: transcendentalia) are the properties of being. In typical accounts being is said to be One, Good and True (unum, bonum, verum).
į:
[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendentals | Transcendentals]] The transcendentals (Latin: transcendentalia) are the properties of being. In typical accounts being is said to be One, Good and True (unum, bonum, verum). ... However, it is in Aristotle that we first see the term transcendentals used. They were so called as they transcended (ὑπερβαίνειν huperbainein) each of his ten categories. Aristotle discusses only unity ("One") explicitly because it is the only transcendental intrinsically related to being, whereas truth and goodness relate to rational creatures.
2015 vasario 23 d., 10:25
atliko -
Pridėta 12 eilutė:
>>bgcolor=#ECD9EC<<
Pridėtos 14-15 eilutės:
[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendentals | Transcendentals]] The transcendentals (Latin: transcendentalia) are the properties of being. In typical accounts being is said to be One, Good and True (unum, bonum, verum).
2014 birželio 07 d., 10:35
atliko -
Pakeistos 13-20 eilutės iš
>><<
į:
>><<
See RepresentationsOfTheOnesome, {{Onesome}}, {{Everything}}
PropertyOfEverything
* is System
* is explicit
* expresses God's not being (or not) as a Scope
See RepresentationsOfTheOnesome, {{Onesome}}, {{Everything}}
PropertyOfEverything
* is System
* is explicit
* expresses God's not being (or not) as a Scope
2014 vasario 09 d., 10:05
atliko -
Pakeistos 3-13 eilutės iš
Attach:onesome.gif
į:
Attach:onesome.gif
>>bgcolor=#FFFFFF<<
The onesome is the [DivisionsOfEverything division of everything] into one perspective. This structure defines issues of order. The onesome has four representations, which are the properties of everything: +3) no external context, +2) simplest algorithm: accepts all things, +1) no internal structure, +0) required concept. [3/00, Andrius Kulikauskas]
http://www.ms.lt/en/andrius/understanding/diagrams/onesome.gif
The onesome is the structure that arises when God takes up the question: How does it seem to me? God finds himself at the center. All is defined with regard to him. There is no way to define him. Whether he exists, or does not exist, does not matter, because he is the one who defines what they mean. With regard to him, they are all the same, and they all apply equally. In the mind of God, all things are true, he takes them literally. His state is that of contradiction in mathematics, where all statements are true, and which is prior to mathematics. I speak of "mind" and "state", but again, these are simply references to the onesome, or rather, to the everything, the structure of God.
Some examples of the onesome: The Universe: Various People, The One Substance: Spinoza, The Universe: the Stoics, God, My Autobiographical Self, Being: Lao Tzu, Heaven: Mo Tzu, Null: MS Access, Religious Symbols: Tillich, Logical Form: Wittgenstein, Structure: Barthes, Set of All Sets: Russell, Experience: Dewey, Possible Self-Consciousness: Kant, All Statements True: Math, Walrasian Function: Friedman, Why?: Heidegger, Sacred Word: Keating, Absolute: Buddhism,Vanity: Ecclesiastics, Experience: Kant, Angular Momentum: Physics, Contemplation: Hinduism, Manifestations of Godhead: Hinduism, Description: Wittgenstein, Nature: Kant, Pure Concept: Kant, Ritual: Hinduism, Self: Hinduism, Necessity: Kierkegaard, Deciding for Others: Marsch, Restlesness: Marsch, Surplus: Economics, Possibility: Kierkegaard
>><<
>>bgcolor=#FFFFFF<<
The onesome is the [DivisionsOfEverything division of everything] into one perspective. This structure defines issues of order. The onesome has four representations, which are the properties of everything: +3) no external context, +2) simplest algorithm: accepts all things, +1) no internal structure, +0) required concept. [3/00, Andrius Kulikauskas]
http://www.ms.lt/en/andrius/understanding/diagrams/onesome.gif
The onesome is the structure that arises when God takes up the question: How does it seem to me? God finds himself at the center. All is defined with regard to him. There is no way to define him. Whether he exists, or does not exist, does not matter, because he is the one who defines what they mean. With regard to him, they are all the same, and they all apply equally. In the mind of God, all things are true, he takes them literally. His state is that of contradiction in mathematics, where all statements are true, and which is prior to mathematics. I speak of "mind" and "state", but again, these are simply references to the onesome, or rather, to the everything, the structure of God.
Some examples of the onesome: The Universe: Various People, The One Substance: Spinoza, The Universe: the Stoics, God, My Autobiographical Self, Being: Lao Tzu, Heaven: Mo Tzu, Null: MS Access, Religious Symbols: Tillich, Logical Form: Wittgenstein, Structure: Barthes, Set of All Sets: Russell, Experience: Dewey, Possible Self-Consciousness: Kant, All Statements True: Math, Walrasian Function: Friedman, Why?: Heidegger, Sacred Word: Keating, Absolute: Buddhism,Vanity: Ecclesiastics, Experience: Kant, Angular Momentum: Physics, Contemplation: Hinduism, Manifestations of Godhead: Hinduism, Description: Wittgenstein, Nature: Kant, Pure Concept: Kant, Ritual: Hinduism, Self: Hinduism, Necessity: Kierkegaard, Deciding for Others: Marsch, Restlesness: Marsch, Surplus: Economics, Possibility: Kierkegaard
>><<
Vienybė
Naujausi pakeitimai
网站
Įvadas #E9F5FC
Klausimai #FFFFC0
Teiginiai #FFFFFF
Kitų mintys #EFCFE1
Dievas man #FFECC0
Iš ankščiau #CCFFCC
Mieli skaitytojai, visa mano kūryba ir kartu visi šie puslapiai yra visuomenės turtas, kuriuo visi kviečiami laisvai naudotis, dalintis, visaip perkurti. - Andrius