手册

数学

发现

Andrius Kulikauskas

  • ms@ms.lt
  • +370 607 27 665
  • My work is in the Public Domain for all to share freely.

Lietuvių kalba

Software

Book.InformationIntegrationTheory istorija

Paslėpti nežymius pakeitimus - Rodyti galutinio teksto pakeitimus

2020 rugpjūčio 29 d., 16:42 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeistos 64-66 eilutės iš
This is anti-physical in that physics admits of no goals. Also, the binding problem is that there is no physical explanation or mechanism for the integration of information. The mind is thus anti-physical.
į:
This is anti-physical in that physics admits of no goals. Also, the binding problem is that there is no physical explanation or mechanism for the integration of information. The mind is thus anti-physical.

* Nonparallelism means that there is a dependency as with weighted averaging. Parallelism indicates nondependency. Thus the conscious mind works to distinguish parameters so that they are nondependent, additive. Then each separate parameter can be adjusted multiplicatively
.
2019 gruodžio 14 d., 19:11 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pridėtos 6-11 eilutės:

Blame = Intent + Harm

Fair share = Contribution + Effort
2019 gruodžio 14 d., 19:04 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeistos 52-58 eilutės iš
I am curious if there is anyone who is compiling lists of experiments related to your theory, and more generally, if there is anything online. I couldn't find anything.
į:
I am curious if there is anyone who is compiling lists of experiments related to your theory, and more generally, if there is anything online. I couldn't find anything.

---------------------------------

''Two self-evident propositions are basic in psychological science. The Axiom of Purposivenessrecognizes that thought and action are functional, directed toward goals. The Axiom of Integrationrecognizes that thought and action depend on joint operation of multiple variables. Two cognitive processes—valuationof stimulus informers to construct their functional, goal-relevant values and integrationof multiple values into a unitary response—are thus basic inthought and action as shown in the Information Integration Diagram (Figure 1.1).'' (Moral Science, page 1)

This is anti-physical in that physics admits of no goals. Also, the binding problem is that there is no physical explanation or mechanism for the integration of information. The mind is thus anti-physical.
2019 gruodžio 14 d., 19:00 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Ištrinta 15 eilutė:
* [[https://www.iitfm.eu/frontpage.pdf | Moral Science]]
Pridėta 22 eilutė:
* [[https://www.iitfm.eu/frontpage.pdf | Moral Science]]. 2017.
2019 gruodžio 14 d., 19:00 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pridėta 17 eilutė:
* [[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780125587044500128 | Information Integration Approach to Emotions and Their Measurement]]. 1989.
Ištrinta 22 eilutė:
* [[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780125587044500128 | Information Integration Approach to Emotions and Their Measurement]]
2019 gruodžio 14 d., 19:00 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pridėtos 17-21 eilutės:
* Contributions To Information Integration Theory: Volume 1: Cognition. 1991.
* Contributions To Information Integration Theory: Volume 2: Social. 1991.
* Contributions To Information Integration Theory: Volume 3: Developmental. 1991.
* A Functional Theory of Cognition. 1996.
* Unified Social Cognition. 2008.
2019 gruodžio 14 d., 18:49 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeistos 1-4 eilutės iš
[[https://www.iitfm.eu | IIT&FM Research Center]]

[[https://iitfm2019.univ-perp.fr/en/iit-fm-conference-2019-90749.kjsp | 2019 konferencija Prancūzijoje]]
į:
[+Information Integration Theory+]

[++Experimental results about mathematical models++]

[+Addition+]

[+Multiplication+]

[+Averaging+]


-----------------------------
'''Sources'''
Pakeistos 17-23 eilutės iš
į:
* [[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780125587044500128 | Information Integration Approach to Emotions and Their Measurement]]
Other sources
* [[https://www.iitfm.eu | IIT&FM Research Center]]
* [[https://iitfm2019.univ-perp.fr/en/iit-fm-conference-2019-90749.kjsp | 2019 Conference in France]]

------------------------------
Pakeistos 47-51 eilutės iš
I am curious if there is anyone who is compiling lists of experiments related to your theory, and more generally, if there is anything online. I couldn't find anything.

'''Išraiška smegenyse'''

* [[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780125587044500128 | Information Integration Approach to Emotions and Their Measurement]]
į:
I am curious if there is anyone who is compiling lists of experiments related to your theory, and more generally, if there is anything online. I couldn't find anything.
2019 gruodžio 14 d., 18:45 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pridėtos 1-35 eilutės:
[[https://www.iitfm.eu | IIT&FM Research Center]]

[[https://iitfm2019.univ-perp.fr/en/iit-fm-conference-2019-90749.kjsp | 2019 konferencija Prancūzijoje]]

Norman H. Anderson
* [[https://www.iitfm.eu/frontpage.pdf | Moral Science]]

'''Relating Information Integration Theory with Systems 1 and 2'''

I will sketch out a theory of consciousness that I think may relate your theory with that of Kahnemann and Tversky. In my theory, there are three levels of reflection:
* stepping-in
* stepping-out
* a state of deciding between the two - this is consciousness

In Kahnemann and Tversky's theory, the first two refer to their System 1 and System 2. I would say that:
* System 1 is the mind that unconsciously "knows", gives one answer, is associative, semantic, intuitive.
* System 2 is the mind that consciously "does not know", asks a question that may require several different answers, is dissasociative, syntactic, rational.

In my thinking, this yields a duality of knowledge where we try to consciously model what we unconsciously know. Our unconscious speaks to our conscious with emotions, and our conscious imposes cognition on our unconscious. Neurologically, this duality is championed by the two hemispheres - typically the right hemisphere is the advocate for System 1 and the left hemisphere is the advocate for System 2. In society, similarly we have gender roles where the female role favors System 1 and the male role favors System 2.

The upshot is that we can, through consciousness, balance these two very different perspectives. This duality is also the basis for logic, as with the logical square, where we can have a dialogue between what we know and what we don't know.

Your theory has demonstrated after many experiments that there are three models that the mind implements: Averaging, Adding and Multiplying. Why these three models? My idea is that:
* System 1 is based on Averaging. Thus our knowledge builds like a neural network.
* System 2 instead breaks that apart into Adding and Multiplying.

Then Consciousness compares what we get relating these two outlooks.

At some point, what I think I should do is go through your books, Unified Social Cognition and A Functional Theory of Cognition, and simply make a list of the experiments where the different models arise. Then I could see if my idea is tenable.

I am curious if there is anyone who is compiling lists of experiments related to your theory, and more generally, if there is anything online. I couldn't find anything.

'''Išraiška smegenyse'''

* [[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780125587044500128 | Information Integration Approach to Emotions and Their Measurement]]

Naujausi pakeitimai


Introduction E9F5FC

Understandable FFFFFF

Questions FFFFC0

Notes EEEEEE

  • 维基百科
  • 影片
  • 科学期刊文章
  • 读物

Edit right bar

Puslapis paskutinį kartą pakeistas 2020 rugpjūčio 29 d., 16:42
Tweet