Gvildenu | Mintys / IWishToKnow

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArN-YbPlf8M

I Wish to Know

I wish to know everything and apply that 0:03 knowledge 0:04 usefully I share my results so 0:08 far first I survey the facts the 0:11 structures I observe as I explore the 0:14 limits of my mind like a blind man might 0:18 feel the walls of his 0:20 prison then I sketch a theory how I 0:24 imagine these structures arise from 0:26 God's point of 0:28 view I start start with the concept of 0:31 everything which has no external context 0:34 no internal structure is the simplest 0:37 algorithm which accepts all things and a 0:40 required concept we can't learn it 0:42 unless we already have 0:44 it we can divide everything into two 0:47 perspectives in the first opposites 0:50 coexist such as good and bad in Free 0:53 Will in the second all is the same as in 0:58 fate we can divide everything into three 1:02 take a stand follow through and 1:05 reflect I take a stand but do I follow 1:09 through I follow through but do I 1:12 reflect I reflect but do I take a 1:16 stand and into four levels of knowledge 1:20 whether what how why we can think of 1:25 these as questions emphasizing why or as 1:29 answers emphasizing 1:31 whether questions and answers are the 1:34 two representations of the for Su 1:37 whereas the threeome two sum and on sum 1:41 each have four 1:45 representations every effect has had its 1:48 cause but not every cause has had its 1:51 effects this defines the fome and its 1:53 two representations time and space the 1:57 six some allows for Morality just as the 2:00 five sum decision-making four Su 2:02 knowledge threesome participation two Su 2:05 existence and the onesome 2:08 everything the sevensome extends our 2:10 Humanity with the logical square of good 2:13 and bad if we consider the eighth 2:16 possibility where all is good and all is 2:19 bad then the system collapses and all is 2:22 true as with God the resulting Nome has 2:25 four representations significant 2:28 constant Direct true search for 2:31 constancy and you will find one example 2:34 or all is constantly unconstant and also 2:38 what you inspect in judge must be the 2:40 same thus multiply constant this defines 2:43 one all many three of 12 topologies the 2:48 vocabulary of the 2:50 imagination which isolate the parts of 2:54 Divisions scriptures record four kinds 2:57 of Frameworks for our intuition each 3:00 with seven eight perspectives like 3:02 houses with too many rooms for us to 3:04 hold in our minds all at 3:07 once the eight-fold way links us with 3:10 God who loves us more than we love 3:11 ourselves when we're connected we'd 3:14 rather God be or do or think than us 3:17 otherwise we must check ourselves to 3:20 take a stand follow through and 3:23 reflect Jesus's Good Will speaks from 3:27 and to the good we respond emot to what 3:30 meets or disappoints or circumvents or 3:33 extends our 3:35 expectations we channel that to get 3:37 things 3:38 done wisdom addresses doubts such as how 3:42 do I know I'm not a robot with counter 3:45 questions such as would it make any 3:49 difference for each need such as 3:52 survival we apply principles such as 3:55 cling to what you have moreover we can 3:58 be perfect have no needs and we can 4:02 ignore our own needs by taking up the 4:04 needs of 4:06 another I think that these larger 4:08 structures frame three Dynamic 4:11 languages narration describes how things 4:14 happen including how our endeavors 4:17 unfold a story's content is determined 4:20 by a shift in the tension which may be 4:22 forcing commanding explaining or 4:26 caring verbalization is how things get 4:29 meaning 4:30 we listen to the truths of the heart and 4:33 the 4:34 world argumentation is how things come 4:37 to matter I have collected from people 4:40 their deepest values the questions they 4:42 seek to answer and Endeavors they wish 4:45 to achieve I hope to understand 4:49 them I speculate on a theory that would 4:52 account for these structures and 4:53 languages so that I might understand 4:55 them exactly and apply them usefully 5:00 I wish to assume as little as possible 5:03 from which all knowledge might 5:05 unfold assumption is the structure that 5:07 is left when we remove the person who 5:11 assumes I assume an assumer God who is 5:15 prior to all assumption and thus assumes 5:18 all God is alone God experiences 5:23 impulsively God does as God 5:26 thinks what is assumed is what is not 5:30 assumed is not for God they are the same 5:33 for his presence and absence are the 5:36 same yet would God exist even if God 5:40 didn't exist God removes himself and 5:43 thereby creates everything the world the 5:47 system where there is the least 5:48 possibility of God's 5:51 existence everything distinguishes God 5:54 within system and beyond system and thus 5:58 understands 6:00 everything insists that it is not 6:03 God God is not everything and so has a 6:08 context God pulls back away from himself 6:11 as I a person with an omniscope of 24 6:17 concerns God as I is not everything and 6:21 so has a 6:23 filter God and I meet as you through the 6:27 four Frameworks for God's wishes for 6:29 every everything anything something or 6:35 nothing God as you is not everything and 6:39 so has a 6:40 structure God as other is this 6:43 uncoupling of God and I six pairs of 6:47 Frameworks yield divisions 6:48 representations topologies argumentation 6:52 verbalization 6:54 narration I think this unfolding can 6:56 yield the structural facts but now God 6:59 God as other is not everything and so 7:01 God is reduced to love is not required 7:04 as a concept how can we make sense of 7:08 God negating God imposes the very 7:11 understanding which interprets truth as 7:13 God other is perfectly free and may live 7:17 by truth on behalf of all through good 7:20 understanding as with a lost child who 7:22 knows to go where his parents will look 7:24 for 7:26 him this is the full extent of our 7:29 understanding standing the child's view 7:31 of the parents view of the child's view 7:33 of the parents view of the child's view 7:36 by which we appreciate that we are the 7:39 child which is enough for us to find 7:41 rapport with our 7:43 parents our will equates love and 7:46 Perfection but good understanding lets 7:48 love embrace our imperfection whereby we 7:51 decline to live fully this is why there 7:54 is God that we may prefer God's will to 7:58 love over our will to be 8:00 loved we are thereby embraced as you to 8:04 obey and not hurt those who might help 8:06 us thus freely coincide with 8:10 all shared understanding distinguishes 8:13 this coinciding from wishes that admit 8:16 our individuality even to 8:18 disobeying this is how there is a God we 8:21 may prefer Good Will to allow wishes 8:24 rather than impose our 8:27 own as I we are free to seek and believe 8:31 and follow another who does obey such as 8:34 Jesus and likewise give up ourselves to 8:37 win over any enemy and so foster God as 8:41 this slack in 8:43 everything self- understanding allows 8:46 that everything may offer us no culture 8:48 for such belief what is God the wisdom 8:53 that we lack this culture regarding 8:56 anything we may fail to obey or believe 8:59 yet if we care then we are included as 9:02 God to create this culture a kingdom of 9:05 heaven that makes tangible every leap of 9:07 faith so we might all be one in 9:10 love if we don't care then that is bad 9:14 life is the fact that God is good but 9:17 eternal life is the understanding that 9:20 God is distinct from good is there God 9:25 yes God is assumed by us all in our 9:28 acknowledgement that good is 9:30 incomplete truth can't fit in our world 9:33 and refers to God Beyond 9:36 it God wishes us to be alive more than 9:39 we ourselves do God and good are one 9:44 through us we have endless work to do