调查

Andrius

Įvadas E9F5FC

Juodraštis? FFFFFF

Užrašai FCFCFC

Klausimai FFFFC0

Gvildenimai CAE7FA

Pavyzdžiai? F6EEF6

Šaltiniai? EFCFE1

Duomenys? FFE6E6

Išsiaiškinimai D8F1D8

Pratimai? FF9999

Dievas man? FFECC0

Pavaizdavimai? E6E6FF

Miglos? AAAAAA

Asmeniškai? BA9696

Mieli dalyviai! Visa mano kūryba ir kartu visi šie puslapiai yra visuomenės turtas, kuriuo visi kviečiami laisvai naudotis, dalintis, visaip perkurti. - Andrius

Įranga

redaguoti

Mintys.GyvybėsSavybės istorija

Paslėpti nežymius pakeitimus - Rodyti galutinio teksto pakeitimus

2014 birželio 08 d., 07:04 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Pridėtos 10-11 eilutės:

The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
2014 birželio 08 d., 07:04 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Pridėtos 6-9 eilutės:

Living systems require the freedom for selection within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.

Taken from a book on complex systems by David Holland.
2014 birželio 07 d., 10:53 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Pridėtos 1-2 eilutės:
Žr. [[Savybės]]
2014 birželio 07 d., 10:46 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Ištrintos 4-141 eilutės:
See also: PrinciplesOfLife, {{Topologies}}, {{Anything}}, {{Everything}}, EverythingVAnything, FifteenPropertiesOfLife

----

{{Andrius}} [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/363 September 4, 2003]


I went through Christopher Alexander's "The Nature of Order" and his
fifteen principles of life.

I will describe them as the features by which "anything" may connect
itself with "everything" as centers of life, limited and unlimited.

-----------------------------------------------

We can think of "everything" and "anything" as players that wish to
link up with each other.

"Anything" plays through a trinity of roles: taking a stand,
following through, and reflecting. This cycle is the motor of our
life.

"Everything" plays by going beyond itself. It is the infinite
recursiveness of Why? It is the same recursiveness in the cycle of
our soul - taking a stand, following through, reflecting - which is
how we are conscious of everything.

Three of Alexander's properties of life describe this relationship
just as it is.

"take a stand" is in "strong centers" (made of other strong centers)
"follow through" is in "strong boundaries" (same order of magnitude
as centers. itself made up of boundaries)
"reflect" is in "levels of scale" (recursive nesting. regular size
jumps between scales)

Where is everything?
Here it is in the recursive nature, going ever deeper, inward, but
also, going back outward, farther than we may imagine.

We are limited, hence unable to conceive directly our connection, but
may only allude to it. Our conception is thus given not by this
infinite recursion, but through representations of everything.
Everything is represented in four ways, as true, direct, constant,
significant. Moreover, in its relationship with anything, it is
given as a player of a mind game which generates properties of life,
of the oneness of the spirit beyond and within structure, of
everything and anything.

-----------------------------------------------

"Significant" generates a mind game, where significant is that which
is unencompassable, can't be captured:
If thinking is significant, then so is being, for thoughts are
encompassed by the thinker. If being is significant, then so is
doing, for things are encompassed by the actions that manifest them.
If doing is significant, then so is thinking, for actions are
encompassed by the observations made of them.

where is the everything?
everything is identified with the relaxation of global centers to
allow for restatement through local centers.

"be" is in "not-separateness" (not apart from the world, lack of
separation from other centers, blending into them, supporting them,
fragmented boundary)
"do" is in "gradients" (slow variation of larger center makes for
gradient given by new centers)
"think" is in "roughness" (relaxation of global constraints so local
constraints can have priority)

-----------------------------------------------

"Constant" generates a mind game:
In searching for constancy, we find one example of constancy,
otherwise it is constantly unconstant. So the constancy is in
the "one" or in the "all". Note that to do this search, what we
select needs to be the same as what we judge, they are multiply
constant, "many".

where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which searches for centers,
perhaps finding one (and breaking symmetry) or not finding one (and
leaving symmetry) but especially in the regularity of the "many",
which blankets the entire space with centers.

"one" is in the "good shape" (as a shape, made of multiple coherent
centers, built from simple elemental structures, clear building
blocks with distinct symmetries. regularity allows for cross-
relationships, clear division of function, etc.)
"all" is in the "local symmetries" (default solution is symmetry, a
pre-filling of space)
"many" is in the "positive space" (every part is whole onto itself,
not leftover, has a strong center. all space useful, evenhanded
complements, no wasted space.)

-----------------------------------------------

"Direct" generates a mind game:
Our attention can be directed by something other than itself,
an "object". Subsequently, it can be directed by itself, this
is "process". Finally, it may or may not be directed, this
is "subject".

where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which gives attention to centers,
and especially, the subject, the ambiguity and interlock.

"object" is in the "contrast" (creation of differentiation,
acknowledgement of purposeful, meaningful centers)
"process" is in the "echoes" (repetition of motif at different
levels, same angles as building blocks, same process involved)
"subject" is in the "deep interlock and ambiguity" (center and its
complement enmeshed by shared and ambiguous subcenters)

-----------------------------------------------

"True" generates a mind game, where true is what can't be hidden, is
obvious:

The content and what reveals it may be the same, in which case it
is "necessarily" true. Otherwise, the content may be different from
what reveals it, and follows it, so is "actually" true. Finally,
what may be true is the relationship between the content and what
reveals it, which is "possibly" true.

where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which serves as the center, and
especially the void, what is possible.

"necessary" is in the "simplicity and inner calm" (unnecessary is
taken away, freely focused on function. slow)
"actual" is in the "alternating repetition" (intensified by
counterpoint of systems. continually engages the eye, recurring
action, space repeats, oscillation)
"possible" is in the "void" (solid contrast to the clutter that
surrounds it, connects with infinite void, brings life to mass of
small centers)
2014 birželio 07 d., 10:45 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Pakeistos 3-142 eilutės iš
Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.
į:
Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.

See also: PrinciplesOfLife, {{Topologies}}, {{Anything}}, {{Everything}}, EverythingVAnything, FifteenPropertiesOfLife

----

{{Andrius}} [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/363 September 4, 2003]


I went through Christopher Alexander's "The Nature of Order" and his
fifteen principles of life.

I will describe them as the features by which "anything" may connect
itself with "everything" as centers of life, limited and unlimited.

-----------------------------------------------

We can think of "everything" and "anything" as players that wish to
link up with each other.

"Anything" plays through a trinity of roles: taking a stand,
following through, and reflecting. This cycle is the motor of our
life.

"Everything" plays by going beyond itself. It is the infinite
recursiveness of Why? It is the same recursiveness in the cycle of
our soul - taking a stand, following through, reflecting - which is
how we are conscious of everything.

Three of Alexander's properties of life describe this relationship
just as it is.

"take a stand" is in "strong centers" (made of other strong centers)
"follow through" is in "strong boundaries" (same order of magnitude
as centers. itself made up of boundaries)
"reflect" is in "levels of scale" (recursive nesting. regular size
jumps between scales)

Where is everything?
Here it is in the recursive nature, going ever deeper, inward, but
also, going back outward, farther than we may imagine.

We are limited, hence unable to conceive directly our connection, but
may only allude to it. Our conception is thus given not by this
infinite recursion, but through representations of everything.
Everything is represented in four ways, as true, direct, constant,
significant. Moreover, in its relationship with anything, it is
given as a player of a mind game which generates properties of life,
of the oneness of the spirit beyond and within structure, of
everything and anything.

-----------------------------------------------

"Significant" generates a mind game, where significant is that which
is unencompassable, can't be captured:
If thinking is significant, then so is being, for thoughts are
encompassed by the thinker. If being is significant, then so is
doing, for things are encompassed by the actions that manifest them.
If doing is significant, then so is thinking, for actions are
encompassed by the observations made of them.

where is the everything?
everything is identified with the relaxation of global centers to
allow for restatement through local centers.

"be" is in "not-separateness" (not apart from the world, lack of
separation from other centers, blending into them, supporting them,
fragmented boundary)
"do" is in "gradients" (slow variation of larger center makes for
gradient given by new centers)
"think" is in "roughness" (relaxation of global constraints so local
constraints can have priority)

-----------------------------------------------

"Constant" generates a mind game:
In searching for constancy, we find one example of constancy,
otherwise it is constantly unconstant. So the constancy is in
the "one" or in the "all". Note that to do this search, what we
select needs to be the same as what we judge, they are multiply
constant, "many".

where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which searches for centers,
perhaps finding one (and breaking symmetry) or not finding one (and
leaving symmetry) but especially in the regularity of the "many",
which blankets the entire space with centers.

"one" is in the "good shape" (as a shape, made of multiple coherent
centers, built from simple elemental structures, clear building
blocks with distinct symmetries. regularity allows for cross-
relationships, clear division of function, etc.)
"all" is in the "local symmetries" (default solution is symmetry, a
pre-filling of space)
"many" is in the "positive space" (every part is whole onto itself,
not leftover, has a strong center. all space useful, evenhanded
complements, no wasted space.)

-----------------------------------------------

"Direct" generates a mind game:
Our attention can be directed by something other than itself,
an "object". Subsequently, it can be directed by itself, this
is "process". Finally, it may or may not be directed, this
is "subject".

where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which gives attention to centers,
and especially, the subject, the ambiguity and interlock.

"object" is in the "contrast" (creation of differentiation,
acknowledgement of purposeful, meaningful centers)
"process" is in the "echoes" (repetition of motif at different
levels, same angles as building blocks, same process involved)
"subject" is in the "deep interlock and ambiguity" (center and its
complement enmeshed by shared and ambiguous subcenters)

-----------------------------------------------

"True" generates a mind game, where true is what can't be hidden, is
obvious:

The content and what reveals it may be the same, in which case it
is "necessarily" true. Otherwise, the content may be different from
what reveals it, and follows it, so is "actually" true. Finally,
what may be true is the relationship between the content and what
reveals it, which is "possibly" true.

where is the everything?
everything is identified with that which serves as the center, and
especially the void, what is possible.

"necessary" is in the "simplicity and inner calm" (unnecessary is
taken away, freely focused on function. slow)
"actual" is in the "alternating repetition" (intensified by
counterpoint of systems. continually engages the eye, recurring
action, space repeats, oscillation)
"possible" is in the "void" (solid contrast to the clutter that
surrounds it, connects with infinite void, brings life to mass of
small centers)
2014 birželio 06 d., 12:14 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Pakeistos 1-3 eilutės iš
Attach:propertiesoflife.gif
į:
Attach:propertiesoflife.gif

Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.
2013 gruodžio 28 d., 22:05 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Pridėta 1 eilutė:
Attach:propertiesoflife.gif

GyvybėsSavybės


Naujausi pakeitimai


Puslapis paskutinį kartą pakeistas 2014 birželio 08 d., 07:04