Įvadas E9F5FC

Juodraštis? FFFFFF

Užrašai FCFCFC

Klausimai FFFFC0

Gvildenimai CAE7FA

Pavyzdžiai? F6EEF6

Šaltiniai? EFCFE1

Duomenys? FFE6E6

Išsiaiškinimai D8F1D8

Pratimai? FF9999

Dievas man? FFECC0

Pavaizdavimai? E6E6FF

Istorija AAAAAA

Asmeniškai? BA9696

Mieli dalyviai! Visa mano kūryba ir kartu visi šie puslapiai yra visuomenės turtas, kuriuo visi kviečiami laisvai naudotis, dalintis, visaip perkurti. - Andrius



See also: FourAddOne, JesusChrist

Logic of Jesus

Positive and negative directions.

Logic of Jesus Jesus considers the purpose of our activity in the world. He says that the purpose of our activity should come from beyond the world, rather than from the world itself. His logic has us reject the purpose of the truth of the world, and take up the purpose of the truth of the heart. We go beyond the world by having good will, or the good heart lives through us from beyond the world. And so slack increases. In each case, his logic expresses the complexity of giving and not giving the slack, with the simplest being to "get along", and the subtlest being to "satisfy". In each case, there is an underlying division of everything, and a perspective within it that may either have slack from beyond, or not: 2some=>fate, 3some=>take-a-stand, 4some=>whether, 5some=>present.

  • save - they do not have to blame
  • take a stand - they do not have to convince
  • satisfy - they do not have to account
  • get along - they do not have to judge
  • be unconditional - they do not have to be consistent
  • take care of - they do not have to justify

Each of the latter offer a "unity" and assume there is "bad".

Knowledge is what is understood. We can go from lesser understanding to lesser knowledge, as with save. Or from lesser knowledge to lesser understanding, as with blame.

Spirit is the unity of representations. Properties are the representations of structure. Nature is the unity of representations of structure.

Understanding. Activity.

Consider: how does take care of relate to caring, believing, obeying, etc. How does take a stand relate to take a stand, follow through, reflect, etc.

Peace = good will. Bad will is without peace.

Wisdom = what do I truly want? Error is without asking what I truly want.

Eternal life = be perfect. Loss is without being perfect.

Looking back and seeing that which was not there. God wishing and not wishing.

Bad will, error, loss may be understood to have intent: Evil, sin, death. This is Milton's trinity of evil.

I should relate these to choices of the heart and the world (as in general structure - perhaps the counterquestions?) And I should add Jesus' antitheses.

  • Unconditional vs. consistent
  • Take care of vs. justify
  • Take a stand vs. convince
  • Save vs. blame
  • Get along vs. judge
  • Satisfy vs. account


Naujausi pakeitimai

Puslapis paskutinį kartą pakeistas 2014 birželio 05 d., 12:37