Mintys.Paradox istorijaPaslėpti nežymius pakeitimus - Rodyti kodo pakeitimus 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 15:08
atliko -
Pakeistos 3-16 eilutės iš
I identify six themes among paradoxes with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. I further take this to be the gap between signifier and signified, as characterized by six equivalences which yield six qualities of signs. Our minds leverage the tensions in these equivalences to shift our attention from what we know to what we don't know. We thus variously clarify what we don't know. In 1998, I was intrigued by educator Kestas Augutis's vision that every high school student write three books (a chronicle, a thesaurus, and an encyclopedia) so as to master three kinds of thinking (sequential, hierarchical, and network). I thus collected dozens of examples of how we organize our thoughts. Surprisingly, we never use sequences, hierarchies or networks in isolation. Instead, we use them in pairs:
In general, a first, large, unified, comprehensive structure grows so robust that we restructure it with a second, smaller, different structure of multiple vantage points. In 2012, I analyzed and grouped all of the paradoxes listed in Wikipedia. This yielded the following six themes:
į:
I identify six themes among paradoxes with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. It is the gap between signifier and signified, as characterized by six equivalences which yield six qualities of signs. Our minds leverage the tensions in these equivalences to shift our attention from what we know to what we don't know. We thus variously clarify what we don't know. In 1998, I was intrigued by educator Kestas Augutis's vision that every high school student write three books (a chronicle, a thesaurus, and an encyclopedia) so as to master three kinds of thinking (sequential, hierarchical, and network). I thus collected dozens of examples of how we organize our thoughts. Surprisingly, we never use sequences, hierarchies or networks in isolation. Instead, we use them in pairs:
In general, a first, large, unified, comprehensive structure grows so robust that we restructure it with a second, smaller, different structure of multiple vantage points. In 2012, I analyzed and grouped all of the paradoxes listed in Wikipedia. This yielded the following six themes:
Pakeistos 18-30 eilutės iš
Each type of paradox brings to light the essential gap between the (seemingly infinite) primary comprehensive structure and the (manifestly finite) secondary structure which organizes our vantage points. Our mind visualizes a qualitative but illusory relationship between the primary and secondary structures. Upon closer inspection it becomes apparent that there is no definitive way to match up the two structures. However, these six mental illusions do allow our minds to make tangible that gap, which is to say, that which we do not know. This may be considered as the gap between signified and signifier. Consider four levels of knowledge (whether, what, how, why) in terms of Peirce's types of signs (the thing itself, icon, index, symbol). Then pairs of these four levels yield six qualities of signs. A sign can be:
į:
Each type of paradox brings to light the essential gap between the (seemingly infinite) primary comprehensive structure and the (manifestly finite) secondary structure which organizes our vantage points. Our mind visualizes a qualitative but illusory relationship between the primary and secondary structures. Upon closer inspection it becomes apparent that there is no definitive way to match up the two structures. However, these six mental illusions do allow our minds to make tangible that gap, which is to say, that which we do not know. This may be considered as the gap between signified and signifier. Consider four levels of knowledge (whether, what, how, why) in terms of Peirce's types of signs (the thing itself, icon, index, symbol). Then pairs of these four levels yield six qualities of signs. A sign can be:
Paradoxes thus heighten and reveal six ways that our minds foster our mental freedom, ever shifting from the structures we know to that gap which models what we don't know. 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 14:51
atliko -
Pakeista 3 eilutė iš:
I identify six themes among paradoxes with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. We may take this to be the gap between signifier and signified, as characterized by six qualities of signs. Paradoxes make evident our mental freedom but also circumscribe it by revealing six equivalences which our minds regularly leverage. These tensions let our minds shift from what we know to what we don't know. We thus variously clarify what we don't know. į:
I identify six themes among paradoxes with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. I further take this to be the gap between signifier and signified, as characterized by six equivalences which yield six qualities of signs. Our minds leverage the tensions in these equivalences to shift our attention from what we know to what we don't know. We thus variously clarify what we don't know. 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 14:39
atliko -
Pakeista 3 eilutė iš:
I identify six themes among paradoxes with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. We may take this to be the gap between signifier and signified, as characterized by six qualities of signs. Paradoxes make evident our mental freedom but also circumscribe it by specifying six equivalences which our minds regularly leverage as tensions to focus upon what we don't know. We thus variously clarify what we don't know. į:
I identify six themes among paradoxes with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. We may take this to be the gap between signifier and signified, as characterized by six qualities of signs. Paradoxes make evident our mental freedom but also circumscribe it by revealing six equivalences which our minds regularly leverage. These tensions let our minds shift from what we know to what we don't know. We thus variously clarify what we don't know. 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 14:36
atliko -
Pakeistos 15-16 eilutės iš
į:
2016 gruodžio 15 d., 14:35
atliko -
Pakeistos 24-29 eilutės iš
į:
2016 gruodžio 15 d., 14:28
atliko -
Pakeista 3 eilutė iš:
Six themes among paradoxes may be identified with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. We may take this to be the gap between signifier and signified, as characterized by six qualities of signs. Paradoxes make evident our mental freedom by specifying six equivalences which our minds regularly leverage in focusing upon what we don't know. We thus variously clarify what we don't know. į:
I identify six themes among paradoxes with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. We may take this to be the gap between signifier and signified, as characterized by six qualities of signs. Paradoxes make evident our mental freedom but also circumscribe it by specifying six equivalences which our minds regularly leverage as tensions to focus upon what we don't know. We thus variously clarify what we don't know. 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 14:20
atliko -
Pakeista 3 eilutė iš:
Six themes among paradoxes may be identified with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. Six qualities of signs and six types of equivalences can be described accordingly in terms of that gap. Paradoxes make evident six kinds of mental inadequacy which our minds regularly leverage in focusing on what we don't know. We thus variously infer what we don't know. į:
Six themes among paradoxes may be identified with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. We may take this to be the gap between signifier and signified, as characterized by six qualities of signs. Paradoxes make evident our mental freedom by specifying six equivalences which our minds regularly leverage in focusing upon what we don't know. We thus variously clarify what we don't know. 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 12:20
atliko -
Pakeista 23 eilutė iš:
However, these six mental illusions do allow our minds to make tangible that gap, which is to say, that which we do not know. Consider four levels of knowledge (whether, what, how, why) in terms of Peirce's types of signs (the thing itself, icon, index, symbol). Then pairs of these four levels yield six qualities of signs. A sign can be: į:
However, these six mental illusions do allow our minds to make tangible that gap, which is to say, that which we do not know. This may be considered as the gap between signified and signifier. Consider four levels of knowledge (whether, what, how, why) in terms of Peirce's types of signs (the thing itself, icon, index, symbol). Then pairs of these four levels yield six qualities of signs. A sign can be: 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 10:51
atliko -
Pakeistos 23-24 eilutės iš
However, these six mental illusions do allow our minds to make tangible that gap, which is to say, that which we do not know. į:
However, these six mental illusions do allow our minds to make tangible that gap, which is to say, that which we do not know. Consider four levels of knowledge (whether, what, how, why) in terms of Peirce's types of signs (the thing itself, icon, index, symbol). Then pairs of these four levels yield six qualities of signs. A sign can be:
2016 gruodžio 15 d., 10:19
atliko -
Pridėtos 22-23 eilutės:
However, these six mental illusions do allow our minds to make tangible that gap, which is to say, that which we do not know. 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 10:17
atliko -
Pakeistos 20-22 eilutės iš
I relate these themes to how we organize thoughts in terms of sequences, hierarchies and networks. į:
Each type of paradox brings to light the essential gap between the (seemingly infinite) primary comprehensive structure and the (manifestly finite) secondary structure which organizes our vantage points. Our mind visualizes a qualitative but illusory relationship between the primary and secondary structures. Upon closer inspection it becomes apparent that there is no definitive way to match up the two structures. 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 10:09
atliko -
Pakeista 15 eilutė iš:
į:
Pakeista 19 eilutė iš:
į:
Ištrintos 20-25 eilutės:
I relate these themes to how we organize thoughts in terms of sequences, hierarchies and networks. Concepts may be inexact.
2016 gruodžio 15 d., 10:00
atliko -
Pakeista 3 eilutė iš:
Six themes among paradoxes may be identified with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. Six qualities of signs and six types of equivalences can be described accordingly in terms of that gap. Paradoxes make evident six kinds of mental inadequacy which our minds regularly leverage in focusing on what we don't know. We thus variously know what we don't know. į:
Six themes among paradoxes may be identified with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. Six qualities of signs and six types of equivalences can be described accordingly in terms of that gap. Paradoxes make evident six kinds of mental inadequacy which our minds regularly leverage in focusing on what we don't know. We thus variously infer what we don't know. 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 09:58
atliko -
Pakeista 20 eilutė iš:
į:
2016 gruodžio 15 d., 09:55
atliko -
Pakeista 14 eilutė iš:
In of paradoxes listed in Wikipedia This yielded the following six themes: į:
In 2012, I analyzed and grouped all of the paradoxes listed in Wikipedia. This yielded the following six themes: Pakeista 18 eilutė iš:
į:
Pakeista 20 eilutė iš:
į:
2016 gruodžio 15 d., 09:50
atliko -
Pakeista 5 eilutė iš:
In 1998, I was intrigued by educator Kestas Augutis's vision that every high school student write three books (a chronicle, a thesaurus, and an encyclopedia) so as to master three kinds of thinking (sequential, hierarchical, and network). I thus collected dozens of examples of how we organize our thoughts. Surprisingly, we never use sequences, hierarchies or networks in isolation. Instead, we use them in pairs. A first, unified, comprehensive structure grows so robust that we restructure it with a second, smaller, different structure of multiple vantage points, as follows: į:
In 1998, I was intrigued by educator Kestas Augutis's vision that every high school student write three books (a chronicle, a thesaurus, and an encyclopedia) so as to master three kinds of thinking (sequential, hierarchical, and network). I thus collected dozens of examples of how we organize our thoughts. Surprisingly, we never use sequences, hierarchies or networks in isolation. Instead, we use them in pairs: Pakeistos 12-13 eilutės iš
My survey of paradoxes listed in Wikipedia yielded the following six themes: į:
In general, a first, large, unified, comprehensive structure grows so robust that we restructure it with a second, smaller, different structure of multiple vantage points. In of paradoxes listed in Wikipedia This yielded the following six themes: 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 09:47
atliko -
Ištrintos 11-21 eilutės:
My survey of paradoxes listed in Wikipedia yielded the following six themes:
Six themes among paradoxes may be identified with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. Six qualities of signs and six types of equivalences can be described accordingly in terms of that gap. Paradoxes make evident six kinds of mental inadequacy which our minds regularly leverage in focusing on what we don't know. We thus variously know what we don't know. In 1998, I was intrigued by educator Kestas Augutis's vision that every high school student write three books (a chronicle, a thesaurus, and an encyclopedia) so as to master three kinds of thinking (sequential, hierarchical, and network). I thus collected dozens of examples of how we organize our thoughts. Surprisingly, we never use sequences, hierarchies or networks in isolation. Instead, we use them in pairs. A first structure grows so robust that we restructure it with a second, smaller, different structure. I observed the following restructurings:
2016 gruodžio 15 d., 09:39
atliko -
Pakeistos 5-9 eilutės iš
In 1998, I was intrigued by educator Kestas Augutis's vision that every high school student write three books (a chronicle, a thesaurus, and an encyclopedia) so as to master three kinds of thinking (sequential, hierarchical, and network). I thus collected dozens of examples of how we organize our thoughts. Surprisingly, we never use sequences, hierarchies or networks in isolation. Instead, we use them in pairs. A first structure grows so robust that we restructure it with a second, smaller, different structure. I observed the following restructurings:
į:
In 1998, I was intrigued by educator Kestas Augutis's vision that every high school student write three books (a chronicle, a thesaurus, and an encyclopedia) so as to master three kinds of thinking (sequential, hierarchical, and network). I thus collected dozens of examples of how we organize our thoughts. Surprisingly, we never use sequences, hierarchies or networks in isolation. Instead, we use them in pairs. A first, unified, comprehensive structure grows so robust that we restructure it with a second, smaller, different structure of multiple vantage points, as follows:
2016 gruodžio 15 d., 09:27
atliko -
Pakeista 1 eilutė iš:
Knowing What We Don't Know: A Taxonomy of Paradox į:
Inferring What We Don't Know: A Taxonomy of Paradox 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 01:14
atliko -
Pakeistos 12-15 eilutės iš
į:
Six themes among paradoxes may be identified with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. Six qualities of signs and six types of equivalences can be described accordingly in terms of that gap. Paradoxes make evident six kinds of mental inadequacy which our minds regularly leverage in focusing on what we don't know. We thus variously know what we don't know. In 1998, I was intrigued by educator Kestas Augutis's vision that every high school student write three books (a chronicle, a thesaurus, and an encyclopedia) so as to master three kinds of thinking (sequential, hierarchical, and network). I thus collected dozens of examples of how we organize our thoughts. Surprisingly, we never use sequences, hierarchies or networks in isolation. Instead, we use them in pairs. A first structure grows so robust that we restructure it with a second, smaller, different structure. I observed the following restructurings:
My survey of paradoxes listed in Wikipedia yielded the following six themes:
I relate these themes to how we organize thoughts in terms of sequences, hierarchies and networks. Concepts may be inexact.
2016 gruodžio 15 d., 01:03
atliko -
Pridėtos 1-17 eilutės:
Knowing What We Don't Know: A Taxonomy of Paradox Six themes among paradoxes may be identified with six different ways that we reorganize thoughts. Paradox is inherent in the gap that arises when we reorganize our thoughts. Six qualities of signs and six types of equivalences can be described accordingly in terms of that gap. Paradoxes make evident six kinds of mental inadequacy which our minds regularly leverage in focusing on what we don't know. We thus variously know what we don't know. In 1998, I was intrigued by educator Kestas Augutis's vision that every high school student write three books (a chronicle, a thesaurus, and an encyclopedia) so as to master three kinds of thinking (sequential, hierarchical, and network). I thus collected dozens of examples of how we organize our thoughts. Surprisingly, we never use sequences, hierarchies or networks in isolation. Instead, we use them in pairs. A first structure grows so robust that we restructure it with a second, smaller, different structure. I observed the following restructurings:
My survey of paradoxes listed in Wikipedia yielded the following six themes:
I relate these themes to how we organize thoughts in terms of sequences, hierarchies and networks. |
ParadoxNaujausi pakeitimai 网站 Įvadas #E9F5FC Klausimai #FFFFC0 Teiginiai #FFFFFF Kitų mintys #EFCFE1 Dievas man #FFECC0 Iš ankščiau #CCFFCC Mieli skaitytojai, visa mano kūryba ir kartu visi šie puslapiai yra visuomenės turtas, kuriuo visi kviečiami laisvai naudotis, dalintis, visaip perkurti. - Andrius |
Puslapis paskutinį kartą pakeistas 2016 gruodžio 15 d., 15:08
|