[[Apimtys]], [[Troškimai]], [[Laisvumas]], [[Tapatumai]], [[Atjautos]], [[Kitas]], [[Sandaros]], [[Santvarkų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], [[Ir du]], [[Žemėlapynas]], [[Dievo šokio išdavos]], [[Lūkesčiai | Lūkesčiai: Atvaizdų kilmė]], [[Vaizduotė]], [[Dvasia]], [[Vaisingos prielaidos]], [[Visaregis]], [[Viskas]], [[Betkas]], 4+1=5, 7+1=0

[[Apimtys]], [[Troškimai]], [[Laisvumas]], [[Tapatumai]], [[Atjautos]], [[Kitas]], [[Sandaros]], [[Santvarkų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], [[Ir du]], [[Žemėlapynas]], [[Dievo šokio išdavos]], [[Lūkesčiai | Lūkesčiai: Atvaizdų kilmė]], [[Vaizduotė]] taip pat: FourAddOne, SevenAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane, WaysOfModeling, ConstructiveHypotheses, Spirit

[[Viskas]], [[Betkas]]

* EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, PositiveVNegative, LoveVLife, BeginningVEnd, LoveVLife, SelfVOther, GodVHuman,

[[Apimtys]], [[Atjautos]], [[Sandaros]], [[Santvarkų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], [[Ir du]], [[Žemėlapynas]], [[Dievo šokio išdavos]], [[Lūkesčiai | Lūkesčiai: Atvaizdų kilmė]], [[Vaizduotė]] taip pat: FourAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane, Scopes, WaysOfModeling, EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, ConstructiveHypotheses, Everything, Anything, Slack, Representations, Empathy, Spirit, BeginningVEnd, LoveVLife, Other, SelfVOther, GodVHuman, SevenAddOne, PositiveVNegative, LoveVLife.

*** 4 apimtis išsako požiūrių lygtis, 2 sutarimus išsako malonė ir teisybė

** Žinojimui - savarankiškai sąvokai, kad ji galėtų būti žinoma. suvokėjo suvokta - reikalingi keturios apimtys, keturi žinojimo lygmenys. Užtat ketverybę gali papildyti požiūrių lygtis. Žinojimas ir nežinojimas gali vienas kitą iššaukti. Tai vyksta aštuonerybe. Panašiai penkerybė, šešerybė, septynerybė atitinkamai iššaukia tris, du ar vieną laisvą matą.

[[Apimtys]], [[Atjautos]], [[Santvarkų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], [[Ir du]], [[Žemėlapynas]], [[Dievo šokio išdavos]],
[[Lūkesčiai | Lūkesčiai: Atvaizdų kilmė]], [[Vaizduotė]] taip pat: FourAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane, Scopes, WaysOfModeling, EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, ConstructiveHypotheses, Everything, Anything, Slack, Representations, Empathy, Spirit, BeginningVEnd, LoveVLife, Other, SelfVOther, GodVHuman, SevenAddOne, PositiveVNegative, LoveVLife.

[[Apimtys]], [[Antrinės sandaros]], [[Santvarkų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], [[Ir du]], [[Žemėlapynas]], [[Dievo šokio išdavos]],

*** Paskiri atvaizdai reiškiasi Dievo šokyje, teigiamais ir neigiamais įsakymais, tačiau jie suvokiami, kaip atvaizdai, kurie vienijami, tiktai gyvenimo lygtimi ir pasirinkimų malūnu.

[[Lūkesčiai | Lūkesčiai: Atvaizdų kilmė]] taip pat: FourAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane, Scopes, WaysOfModeling, EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, ConstructiveHypotheses, Everything, Anything, Slack, Representations, Empathy, Spirit, BeginningVEnd, LoveVLife, Other, SelfVOther, GodVHuman, SevenAddOne, PositiveVNegative, LoveVLife.

Žr. [[Apimtys]], [[Antrinės sandaros]], [[Santvarkų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], [[Ir du]], [[Žemėlapynas]], [[Dievo šokio išdavos]] taip pat: FourAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane, Scopes, WaysOfModeling, EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, ConstructiveHypotheses, Everything, Anything, Slack, Representations, Empathy, Spirit, BeginningVEnd, LoveVLife, Other, SelfVOther, GodVHuman, SevenAddOne, PositiveVNegative, LoveVLife.

[[Lūkesčiai | Lūkesčiai: Atvaizdų kilmė]]

'''Kaip apibrėžti atvaizdus?'''

Žr. [[Apimtys]], [[Antrinės sandaros]], [[Sistemų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], [[Ir du]], [[Žemėlapynas]], [[Dievo šokio išdavos]] taip pat: FourAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane, Scopes, WaysOfModeling, EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, ConstructiveHypotheses, Everything, Anything, Slack, Representations, Empathy, Spirit, BeginningVEnd, LoveVLife, Other, SelfVOther, GodVHuman, SevenAddOne, PositiveVNegative, LoveVLife.

*** Išgyvenimų rūšys.

''2005.04.26 A: Kuom skiriasi dvasia ir sandara? D: Dvasioje yra mano meilė - neribota, o sandaroje yra jūsų meilė - ribota. A: Kaip gali dvasia ir sandara sutapti? D: Tiek kiek vienas kitą myli. A: Vis labiau? D: Vis giliau, artimiau, nes nepriklausomai. Pamatysi. Laiminu tave.''

''2005.04.09 A: Koks ryšys tarp laisvumo ir dvasios bei sandaros? D: Dvasia gyvena per sandarą Ji gali sutapti su ja arba nesutapti.''

''2004.12.13 A: Kaip keturi atvaizdai susiję su susikalbėjimu? D: Aš noriu būti su visais, būti vienas su jais, juos mylėti. Tad tai yra meilės sąlygos. A: Kaip suprasti, meilės sąlgos? D: Meilei reikia, kad galėtumėme gyventi vienas kitame. A: O ką tai reiškia? D: Išeiti iš savęs, ir iš savęs į kitą, ir iš kito į save, ir iš kito. A: Ačiū. D: Myliu.''

''2005.04.27 A: Kaip gali mylintis ir mylimas sutapti? D: Atskleisk savo širdį ir priimk kitą gyventi savyje - tiek jūs galėsite sutapti. A: O kaip atskleidžiama širdis? D: Mylėk - įsakymu kurį priimi, kuriam paklūsti. Sek mano Sūnumi. A ir K: Gerai.''

''2005.04.26 A: Kuom skiriasi dvasia ir sandara? D: Dvasioje yra mano meilė - neribota, o sandaroje yra jūsų meilė - ribota. A: Kaip gali dvasia ir sandara sutapti? D: Tiek kiek vienas kitą myli. A: Vis labiau? D: Vis giliau, artimiau, nes nepriklausomai. Pamatysi. Laiminu tave.''

''2005.04.25 A: Kaip suvokti dvasią, sandarą, atvaizdus ir jų vieningumą? D: Visa tai leidžia man bendrauti su tavimi bei su kitais. O kiti du atvaizdai leidžia jums bendrauti su manimi. A: Tai yra mūsų prielaidos. D: Taip, kad yra širdis.''

''2005.04.20 A: Koks ryšys tarp dviejų atvaizdų ir keturių atvaizdų? D: Aš myliu, o per jus (širdimi) myliu kitą arba save. Jeigu kitą, tai kartu ir save. Aš esu tas kitas, tad jeigu myli tą aš - save - tai kurioje nors apimtyje. O širdis tai yra tas aš, ir ji nesuvokia savo apimties. A: O iš kur ta apimtis? D: Ją nusako kiek aš suvokiu, kad širdis ir aš esame tas pats. A: Mažiau suvokiate, tai didesnė apimtis? D: Taip yra. Pamatysi.''

''2005.03.17 A: Kaip gali vienas atvaizdas tikti keturiems padalinimams bet ne visiems? D: Geras klausimas. Tu pažiūrėk į savo vidų ir pažiūrėk atgal ir tada suprasi.''

''2005.03.16 A: Koks ryšys tarp pradžios ir dvasios ir pabaigos ir sandaros? D: Pradžios veikla yra mylėti, o pabaigos veikla yra būti mylimam, tad dvasia ir sandara. A: O ką čia reiškia mylėti, kas yra gyvybė? D: Mylėti yra palaikyti gyvybę. Tu taip sakai ir taip yra. Kaip gyvybė yra iš pabaigos į pabaigą, meilė yra tos veiklos palaikymas. A: Kas vyksta tame tarpe. D: Taip, kas vyksta tarp pabaigos ir pabaigos.''

''2004.11.16 A: Koks atvaizdų vaidmuo susikalbėjime? D: Turi būti požiūris į kitą ir per jį atgal į save. Tad turi būti įmanoma vienu požiūriu įvairiai priimti kitą.''

''2005.03.21 {{A}}: Kaip suvokti ketverybės, penkerybės, šešerybės, septynerybės atvaizdus, kuo jie skiriasi tarpusavyje ir nuo kitų keturių? {{D}}: Tai yra sandaros išgyvenimai, tad jau turi būti sandara ir taškas už jos ar joje. {{A}}: O kiti keturi atvaizdai? {{D}}: Tai yra sandaros nustatymo lygmenys kurių reikia, kad būtų ką išgyventi. {{A}}: Tad atvaizdai yra išgyvenimo sąlygos? {{D}}: Taip, kartu su aplinkomis - tai visumos ir dalių išgyvenimas.''

''2005.03.19 {{A}}: Koks ryšys tarp pradžios, pabaigos ir suvokimo? {{D}}: Jei nori suprasti mane, būk su manimi pradžioje, o jei suprasti tave, tai reikia būti su tavimi pabaigoje. {{A}}: O kitas? {{D}}: Kitas yra tai per kurį gyvena dvasia. {{A}}: O požiūris? {{D}}: Tai ir yra kitas.''

''2005.03.12 {{A}}: Kaip suprasti, kas yra pabaiga? {{D}}: Pabaiga yra tai į ką tu gali įsijausti po visko. Tai yra sandara kuri yra tavo dvasios namai ir ją atspindi. {{A}}: Tad kok jos ryšys su mumis? {{D}}: Jūs esate ta dvasia išgyvenanti pabaigą. {{A}}: Ir koks jos ryšys su pradžia? {{D}}: Tai sandaros ir dvasios ryšiai - jūsų ir mano. {{A}}: Kokia tavo sandara ir dvasia? {{D}}: Mano dvasia tai aš, o mano sandara viskas. {{A}}: Kokia mūsų dvasia ir sandara? {{D}}: Jūsų sandara yra gyvenimas ir kartu amžinas gyvenimas (žiūrint kaip žiūrite) o jūsų dvasia esate patys.''

>><<

The question is important because the Foursome considers the distance from the End, and so this is the basis for Self-understanding - who is living through that?

* Apimtys yra visko atvaizdai. Viskas yra pats sau atvaizdas.
** Niekas turi vidinę sandarą, tuo tarpu viskas, betkas, kažkas jos neturi.
* Apimtys išsako nuotolį tarp Dievo už mūsų ir Dievo mumyse.

* Apimtys išsako kiek esame įsijungę į šį pasaulį. Dievas puoselėja širdingą įsijungimą. Iš pradžių tai šaltas, strimagalvis, beširdis atsitraukimas, mumis (manimi, tavimi, kitu) išaugantis tačiau į šiltą, širdingą, sąmoningą, visapusišką įsijungimą, atsidavimą.
* Representations of Everything (expressed by the Onesome) and of God (expressed by the Nullsome). They express the roles of Equals that they play with each other - hence the role that one may have with one's Self.
* Žinojimui - savarankiškai sąvokai, kad ji galėtų būti žinoma. suvokėjo suvokta - reikalingi keturios apimtys, keturi žinojimo lygmenys. Užtat ketverybę gali papildyti požiūrių lygtis. Žinojimas ir nežinojimas gali vienas kitą iššaukti. Tai vyksta aštuonerybe. Panašiai penkerybė, šešerybė, septynerybė atitinkamai iššaukia tris, du ar vieną laisvą matą.

** Iš pradžių nesiskiria žinojimas ir nežinojimas - juos skiria niekas. Toliau išsiskiria, ką žinome ir nežinome, atsiranda kažkas. Toliau išsiskiria paskiras žinovas ir bendrasis žinovas, atsiranda betkas. Toliau išsiskiria santykiai tarp paskiro ir bendrojo žinovų, tų santykių asimetriškumas, atsiranda viskas.

Ketverybė, penkerybė, šešerybė, septynerybė yra bendruomeninės sandaros. Jos išsako bendruomenės tikrovę. Jos turi po du atvaizdus: pažinovo ir pažintojo (arba pažinimo lauko). Šiedu atvaizdai išsako širdies būklę: Dievo (už mūsų) ir širdies (mūsų gelmėse) kampus.
* Panašiai, kaip kad pašalinus visus daiktus, visus kūnus liktų laikas ir erdvė, kaip Kantas pastebėjo. Bendrai, padalinimai 4-7 išsako pasitraukimus (-4,-3,-2,-1). Septynerybė: Kito pasitraukimas, Šešerybė: Tavo pasitraukimas, Penkerybė: Mano pasitraukimas, Ketverybė: Dievo pasitraukimas.


Žmogaus laisvė (mažėjantis laisvumas) ir Dievo meilė (didėjantis laisvumas) yra išvirkštinės sąvokos, kuriose priešingai reiškiasi dėmesys.

They express the roles that Unequals play with each other - hence the role that one may have with one's Other.

So, more broadly, living through emotional resolution is subjective, as God through us, and living through cognitive resolution is objective, as human through us. And here God is what is unbounded, and human is what is bounded.

Didėjantis ir mažėjantis laisvumas
* Increasing slack is spirit gives way to structure. This is the case of God, who goes beyond himself into structure. Here spirit and structure are in parallel, they are kept separate. As they grow independent, the slack increases. Spirit opens up more and more slack for structure until it is possible to have an independent heart. With increasing slack, we have the perspective of the '''actor''', of that which is loved - life. This is the slack of '''non-structure'''.
* Decreasing slack is structure gives way to spirit. This is the case of the heart, which finds itself within structure and then looks for God. Here spirit and structure are taken together, and they grow dependent, and slack decreases. Ultimately, the two collapse back into spirit. With decreasing slack, we have the perspective of the '''surroundings''', of that which loves. This is the slack of '''non-activity'''.

Klausimas (step out), atsakymas (step in), viskas - lygiagrečiai.

A preference for decreasing slack is bad, and a preference for increasing slack is good - God's perspective is preferable to the heart's perspective.

Two Representations express the role (as Unequals) that one has with one's Other. See BeginningVEnd.

Mylintis ir mylimas:
* This is to love (increasing slack) (Godly)(Beginning) and to be loved (decreasing slack) (heart)(humanly)(End).
* To love is to step forwards to meet the one going beyond themselves. To be loved is to go beyond oneself to coincide with another.
* These two stances are two outlooks in going beyond ourselves. One is that of loving (standing apart from oneself) and the other is of being loved (standing on one's own). And the four levels of knowledge are four scopes where the lover and the loved may coincide.
* Note: to be loved and then to love - which is to say, to go beyond oneself, coincide with one who has stepped forward, and then to turn around so as to step forward - to love - oneself - this is to allow for a coinciding of views - and a parallel view as with eternal life. Hence understanding is in the turning around, this returning to the beginning. And here that beginning is at the heart. So the movement seems to be: go beyond oneself, coincide with the one who steps forward to meet you, and then turn around to face the one you went beyond.

Negation is related to decreasing slack.

Malonė ir teisybė
* Pasirinkimas tarp malonės ir teisybės yra išsakytas sandarų, požiūrių tačiau jame grindžiamas skirtumas tarp šilumos ir šalčio.
* Teisybė vaizduoja sandarumą, malonė vaizduoja nesandarumą.

See also: Self-understanding, SharedUnderstanding, Activity, RecurringActivity, BeginningVEnd, SelfVOther, SpiritVStructure.

These are given by IncreasingSlack and DecreasingSlack. These representations are relevant for the divisions that express the situation of the heart. They give the heart's point of view as to the differing outlooks of God and heart. (Analyze the pairs of representations)

Žinojimas, tai kaip kvėpavimas - dvasią įtrauki ir išpūti (ar atvirkščiai).

* Apimtys išsako kiek širdis išeina už savęs.

** There are four Scopes, degrees of separation, given by the number of contexts (zero to three), the number of “pinches” in the relationship between God inside (going beyond) and God beyond (going inside).

It seems the four representations express the distance between two concepts as given by the difference between the concept and the sum. So, for example, first the difference is everything, as in the case of the will. Ultimately, the difference is nothing.

''It seems that '' to '' means going beyond and also '' being with.

I will work here to flesh out these representations based on what I know about the representations of the Nullsome, Onesome, Twosome, Threesome. There are four levels: why - how - what - whether (or is it +3, +2, +1, +0).

||'''Nulybės atvaizdai'''||tiesus||betarpiškas||pastovus||prasmingas||

||'''padalinimai'''||nulybė||vienybė||dvejybė||trejybė||

Yra šeši atvaizdai. Jie susiję su žinojimu, tad su veiksmu +2: Klausimas, Atsakymas, Viskas, Betkas, Kažkas, Niekas. Šeši atvaizdai yra būtent Betko atvaizdai. Tuo tarpu padalinimai yra Visko padalinimai. O aplinkybės yra Kažko aplinkybės.

* There are four Scopes, degrees of separation, given by the number of contexts (zero to three), the number of “pinches” in the relationship between God inside (going beyond) and God beyond (going inside). Scopes give the distance between God within and God beyond.

Niekas, kažkas, betkas, viskas yra įsijungimo apimtys šiame pasaulyje. Dievas puoselėja širdingą įsijungimą. Iš pradžių tai šaltas, strimagalvis, beširdis atsitraukimas, mumis (manimi, tavimi, kitu) išaugantis tačiau į šiltą, širdingą, sąmoningą, visapusišką įsijungimą, atsidavimą.

* Everything wishes for nothing - has no needs, is self-sufficient.
(Going beyond this, we have needs, and a system of operating
principles for responding.)
* Everything wishes for something - has no doubts, is certain, things
are just as it wishes. (Going beyond this, we have doubts, and a
system of counterquestions for responding.)
* Everything wishes for anything - has no expectations, is calm, all
things are good for it. (Going beyond this, we have expectations,
and a system of emotional responses for responding.)
* Everything wishes for everything - has no trials, is loving, loves
us more than we love ourselves. (Going beyond this, we have trials,
and an eightfold way for responding.)

* Nedviprasmybės. (Dievas yra daugiaprasmiškas.)
* Suvokimai, kaip išeinama už savęs.

* A relationship with a Self, which is either as equals (SpiritVStructure) or as unequals (BeginningVEnd).
* A ConstructiveHypothesis that contributes either a positive or a negative perspective.

* Representations: scopes and keeping separate may be understood in terms of representation.

* Būdai, kampai, kaip įsivaizduoti, aprėpti visko padalinimą.
* '''Požiūriai''' į požiūrį
* Filtrai, kriterijai, kuriais ne viskas priimama, taip paneigiant visko savybę, jog viskas priima visa ką.

* Betko atvaizdai (4+2), pasirinkimai, tuo pačiu visko atvaizdai (troškimai) arba laisvumo atvaizdai (tapatumai).
* Neigiami įsakymai, teigiamų įsakymų lygmenų poros. (4 2)
* Laipsnyno (3+3) lygmenys.
* Santykiai tarp visumos ir požiūrio, tarp visko ir kažko.
* Santykiai tarp dvasios (pasikartojančios veiklos) ir sandaros.
* Santykiai tarp savęs ir kito.
* Išgyvenimų rūšys.
* Ženklų savybės.

* Asmenų lygmuo išsakantis Tave.
* Santykis su savastimi: klausimas (atsiplėšimas nuo savęs, didėjantis laisvumas), atsakymas (įsisavinimas, mažėjantis laisvumas) ir apimtys (pjūviai, kaip įeiname į save): viskas, betkas, kažkas, niekas.
* Šeši atvaizdai išsako išėjimą už savęs. Keturi padalinimų atvaizdai išsako išėjimo už savęs pakopas: nieko, kažko, betko ir visko. O du padalinimų atvaizdai išsako žinojimą: pasitraukimą (atsitokėjimą) ir prisišaukimą (įsijungimą).

Žr. [[Apimtys]], [[Antrinės sandaros]], [[Sistemų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], [[Ir du]], [[Žemėlapynas]], [[Dievo šokio išdavos]] taip pat: FourAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane, Scopes, WaysOfModeling, EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, ConstructiveHypotheses, Everything, Anything, Slack, Representations, Empathy, Spirit, BeginningVEnd, LoveVLife, Other, SelfVOther

'''Visko, laisvumo ir betko atvaizdai'''

Žr. [[Antrinės sandaros]], [[Sistemų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], [[Ir du]], [[Žemėlapynas]], [[Dievo šokio išdavos]] taip pat: FourAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane, Scopes, WaysOfModeling, EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, ConstructiveHypotheses, Everything, Anything, Slack, Representations, Empathy, Spirit, BeginningVEnd, LoveVLife, Other, SelfVOther

[+Viskas, betkas, kažkas, niekas+]

Žr. [[Antrinės sandaros]], [[Sistemų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], taip pat: FourAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane, Scopes, WaysOfModeling, EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, ConstructiveHypotheses, Everything, Anything, Slack, Representations, Empathy, Spirit, Structure, Representations, BeginningVEnd, Understanding, LoveVLife, Other, SelfVOther

'''Kaip atvaizdai kyla savarankiškam Dievui išgyvenant lūkesčius?'''

Yra šeši atvaizdai. Jie susiję su žinojimu, tad su veiksmu +2: Klausimas, Atsakymas, Viskas, Betkas, Kažkas, Niekas. Šeši atvaizdai yra būtent Betko atvaizdai. Tuo tarpu padalinimai yra Visko padalinimai.

Yra šeši atvaizdai. Jie susiję su žinojimu, tad su veiksmu +2: Klausimas, Atsakymas, Viskas, Betkas, Kažkas, Niekas.

Yra šeši atvaizdai. Jie susiję su žinojimu: Klausimas, Atsakymas, Viskas, Betkas, Kažkas, Niekas.

See also: Self-understanding, SharedUnderstanding, Activity, RecurringActivity.

This is to love (increasing slack) (Godly)(Beginning) and to be loved (decreasing slack) (heart)(humanly)(End).

To love is to step forwards to meet the one going beyond themselves. To be loved is to go beyond oneself to coincide with another.

Susiję su: BeginningVEnd, SelfVOther, SpiritVStructure.

* 6) we are suffering =
we have trials, but everything is self-sufficient, lacks nothing.

* 5) we are loving =
we have trials, but everything is certain, things are just as it
wishes.

* 4) we are relying =
we have trials, but everything is calm, all that happens is good.

* 3) we are believing =
we have expectations, but everything is certain, things are just as
it wishes.

* 2) we are in suspense =
we have expectations, but everything is self-sufficient, lacks nothing

* 1) we are engaging =
we have doubts, but everything is self-sufficient, lacks nothing

'''Viskas, betkas, kažkas, niekas'''

'''Didėjantis ir mažėjantis laisvumas'''

They express the roles that Unequals play with each other - hence the role that one may have with one's Other.

* be - do - thin

'''How'''

Increasing slack is spirit gives way to structure. This is the case of God, who goes beyond himself into structure. Here spirit and structure are in parallel, they are kept separate. As they grow independent, the slack increases. Spirit opens up more and more slack for structure until it is possible to have an independent heart. With increasing slack, we have the perspective of the '''actor''', of that which is loved - life. This is the slack of '''non-structure'''.

Decreasing slack is structure gives way to spirit. This is the case of the heart, which finds itself within structure and then looks for God. Here spirit and structure are taken together, and they grow dependent, and slack decreases. Ultimately, the two collapse back into spirit. With decreasing slack, we have the perspective of the '''surroundings''', of that which loves. This is the slack of '''non-activity'''.

(See Self-understanding). These two representations may express structures from the '''negative''' perspective, which is to say, from what is '''not'''.

'''Dvasios ir sandaros santykis'''


'''Note: I have rethought this as Activity V Structure and am describing this in the page on Representations.'''

----

''I am rethinking this - the structure for the four representations - as the relationship SelfVOther between Self and Other.''

----

Žr. [[Antrinės sandaros]], [[Sistemų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], taip pat: FourAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane, Scopes, WaysOfModeling, EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, ConstructiveHypotheses, Everything, Anything, Slack, Representations, Empathy

These representations express the extent to which the heart go beyond itself: Everything, Anything, Something, Nothing. These are Scopes.

http://www.ms.lt/en/andrius/understanding/diagrams/understanding.gif

http://www.ms.lt/en/andrius/understanding/diagrams/conjunctions.gif

Žr. [[Antrinės sandaros]], [[Sistemų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], taip pat: FourAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane, Scopes, WaysOfModeling, EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, ConstructiveHypotheses

* Betko atvaizdai (4+2), tuo pačiu visko arba laisvumo atvaizdai.

[[Netroškimai]] Žr.taip pat Everything, Anything, Slack, Representations, Empathy

Šešios nedviprasmybės yra pasirinkimai, antrinės sandaros, betko atvaizdai.

Dievas yra daugiaprasmiškas.

http://www.ms.lt/en/andrius/understanding/diagrams/representationsofanything.gif

Andrius: [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/318 June 14, 2003]

* Betko atvaizdai, tuo pačiu visko arba laisvumo atvaizdai.
* Laipsnyno lygmenys.

* Gyvenimo lygties lygmenimis: dvasia, sandara, atvaizdai, vieningumas.

Viskas, betkas, kažkas, niekas yra semiotinis kvadratas, septynerybės kampai.

2 + 4 atvaizdai:

The first two are the representations for the Foursome, Fivesome, Sixsome, Sevensome, and they arise when the observer is distinct from the observational plane. We may think of them as external representations, which is to say, external views upon the whole.

The other four are the representations of the Nullsome, Onesome, Twosome, Threesome, and they are the scopes of access that the observational plane provides the observer, respectively: all perspectives, any perspective, a perspective, no perspective. They are internal representations, internal views upon the whole.

'''Atvaizdas yra:'''

* * = 4x2 išminties atvaizdai: gera valia

Here is another, perhaps related account:

where I mean:

* visko atvaizdai: troškimai
* laisvumo atvaizdai: tapatumai
* betko atvaizdai: pasirinkimai
* išminties atvaizdai: gera valia

Note that first God goes beyond himself through the operation [AddOne +1]. God goes beyond himself into structure, inwards, and ultimately, into self. This gives rise to the heart, a self. Then this self, this heart, goes beyond itself - backwards, outwards. It goes beyond itself with regard to some scope which indicates the extent to which it has gone beyond, which it has separated itself from itself:

==='''Representations of Foursome, Fivesome, Sixsome, Sevensome'''===

==='''Representations of Everything, Slack and Anything'''===

Šeši atvaizdai: klausimas, atsakymas, niekas, kažkas, betkas, viskas.

Viskas, betkas, kažkas, niekas yra semiotinis kvadratas, septynerybės kampai.

Žr. [[Sistemų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], [[Padalinimai]], taip pat: FourAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane, Scopes, WaysOfModeling, EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, ConstructiveHypotheses

* A relationship between a {{Perspective}} and a {{Whole}}, which is to say, between {{Something}} and {{Everything}}.

* A relationship with a {{Self}}, which is either as equals (SpiritVStructure) or as unequals (BeginningVEnd).
* A representation is that which can be thought. It is that which a {{Mind}} can look at. Whereas a {{Unity}} (of representations) is that which can {{Care}}, and by which a {{heart}} looks out.
* A criteria, which is to say, a filter upon {{Everything}}. We know that everything accepts all things (this is one of the PropertiesOfEverything and is a RepresentationsOfTheOnesome). Even so, we can filter everything. Thus a representation negates this representation of the onesome.

AndriusKulikauskas: {{Divisions}} of {{Everything}} have representations by which we conceive them. I have also used the word ''criteria''. A representation provides us with a vantage point upon a division so that it becomes accessible to us. Without a representation, we are not able to conceive the division.

The {{Foursome}}, {{Fivesome}}, {{Sixsome}} and {{Sevensome}} have two {{Representations}}: one in terms of an '''observer''', and another in terms of an ObservationalPlane; in terms of the observed and in terms of the observer.

* {{Observer}}

* {{Everything}} = the observational plane which coincides with both the observer and the observed
* {{Anything}} = the observational plane which coincides with the observer, but not the observed
* {{Something}} = the observational plane which coincides with the observed, but not the observer
* {{Nothing}} = the observational plane which coincides with neither the observer nor the observed

The first two are the representations for the {{Foursome}}, {{Fivesome}}, {{Sixsome}}, {{Sevensome}}, and they arise when the observer is distinct from the observational plane. We may think of them as external representations, which is to say, external views upon the whole.

The other four are the representations of the {{Nullsome}}, {{Onesome}}, {{Twosome}}, {{Threesome}}, and they are the scopes of access that the observational plane provides the observer, respectively: all perspectives, any perspective, a perspective, no perspective. They are internal representations, internal views upon the whole.

Note that the {{Observed}} is not a representation. This is because the observed is that {{Whole}} upon which a representation is providing an angle. In this sense, the observed is {{Everything}}, and the observer is {{Something}}.

Note also that the six representations do not form a DivisionOfEverything because they overlap. Instead, they may be thought of as the union of two divisions of everything: the {{Twosome}} and the {{Foursome}}.

* {{Structure}} = DecreasingSlack
* {{Activity}} = IncreasingSlack
* {{Everything}} = indefinite and unspecified = structure and activity are uncoupled
* {{Anything}} = definite and unspecified = top down: structure yields activity
* {{Something}} = definite and specified = structure and activity are in a loop
* {{Nothing}} = indefinite and specified = bottom up: activity yields structure

This is to say that the representations (and also the {{Topologies}} are intimately related to the operation [AddTwo +2].

* Four of the representations serve to conceive the first four divisions: {{Nullsome}}, {{Onesome}}, {{Twosome}}, {{Threesome}}. As such they are representations of {{Everything}} (expressed by the {{Onesome}}) and of {{God}} (expressed by the {{Nullsome}}). They express the roles of {{Equals}} that they play with each other - hence the role that one may have with one's {{Self}}. See also: {{Understanding}}, GoodUnderstanding, {{Structure}}, RecurringStructure, PairsOfConcepts.
* Two of the representations serve to conceive the second four divisions: {{Foursome}}, {{Fivesome}}, {{Sixsome}}, {{Sevensome}}. As such they are representations of {{Slack}} (expressed as the {{Sevensome}}). They express the roles that {{Unequals}} play with each other - hence the role that one may have with one's {{Other}}. See also: {{Self-understanding}}, SharedUnderstanding, {{Activity}}, RecurringActivity.

==='''Representations of {{Nullsome}}, {{Onesome}}, {{Twosome}}, {{Threesome}}'''===

These representations express the extent to which the heart go beyond itself: {{Everything}}, {{Anything}}, {{Something}}, {{Nothing}}. These are {{Scopes}}.

Note that first {{God}} goes beyond himself through the operation [AddOne +1]. God goes beyond himself into structure, inwards, and ultimately, into self. This gives rise to the heart, a self. Then this self, this heart, goes beyond itself - backwards, outwards. It goes beyond itself with regard to some scope which indicates the extent to which it has gone beyond, which it has separated itself from itself:

* {{Unity}}: separated from oneself by {{Nothing}}
* {{Representation}}: separated from oneself by {{Something}}
* {{Structure}}: separated from oneself by {{Anything}}
* {{Spirit}}: separated from oneself by {{Everything}}

(This helps make clear why {{Love}} is a unity and God is a spirit).

These scopes are those from which the one who is loved can turn around and, along with God, love themselves. These representations are relevant for the divisions that express the situation of God. They give God's point of view as to God's relationship with the heart. They express the scope at which God must StepForward to meet the heart. (Perhaps this relates the directions of {{Forwards}} ({{God}}) and {{Backwards}} ({{heart}})?)

{{Knowledge}} is the issue that (as a state of mind) involves four scopes by which a {{Concept}} "stands on its own". (See the {{Foursome}}. This makes it possible for "standing apart from oneself" (GoingBeyondOneself) to become a concrete relationship "within a world" between a lover and a loved. And life is the underlying spirit expressed by the various (six) ways they can relate to each other.

A {{Concept}} is that which "stands on its own". Therefore it needs to be able to "stand apart from itself". The above four perspectives express the different scopes which that entails. I think this is why the basic divisions (of everything into zero, one, two or three perspectives) have four representations.

==='''Representations of {{Foursome}}, {{Fivesome}}, {{Sixsome}}, {{Sevensome}}'''===

Increasing slack is spirit gives way to structure. This is the case of God, who goes beyond himself into structure. Here spirit and structure are in parallel, they are kept separate. As they grow independent, the slack increases. Spirit opens up more and more slack for structure until it is possible to have an independent {{heart}}. With increasing slack, we have the perspective of the '''actor''', of that which is loved - life. This is the slack of '''non-structure'''.

(See {{Self-understanding}}). These two representations may express structures from the '''negative''' perspective, which is to say, from what is '''not'''.

This is to love (increasing slack) (Godly)({{Beginning}}) and to be loved (decreasing slack) (heart)(humanly)({{End}}).

{{Negation}} is related to decreasing slack.

A {{Concept}}, as ''that which stands on its own'', opens up two stances: conceiver - "standing apart from oneself" (which is God's stance and increases slack and opens up space for a heart) and conceived - "standing on one's own" (which is the stance of the heart - that godlet within us that has awaken within our structure, is figuring itself out - and decreases slack). These are the two representations by which we conceive the division of everything into four perspective (or five, or six, or seven).

==='''Representations of {{Everything}}, {{Slack}} and {{Anything}}'''===

* four of them to {{Everything}} as {{Wishes}}: everything wishes for: nothing, something, anything, everything
* two of them to {{Slack}} as {{Scopes}}: unbounded and bounded - ''increasing slack'' is ''slack has scope unbounded'' and ''decreasing slack'' is ''slack has scope bounded''.
* all of them to {{Anything}} as {{Choices}}: anything chooses: to wish for nothing, something, anything, everything; to wish; to not wish.

The representations (divided 4:2) are somehow related to the {{Gradations}} (divided 3:3).

Representations are a SecondaryStructure that arises through SharedUnderstanding by the process of {{Factoring}}. The six representations arise as the product of factors two and three, with a fourfold ambiguity.

Representations have to do with increasing slack, whereas {{Topologies}} have to do with decreasing slack.

*'''good word''' is the good of '''increasing slack''', the good from an {{Observer}}
*'''good God''' is the good of '''why''', the good from {{Everything}}
*'''good person''' is the good of '''how''', the good from {{Anything}}
*'''good deed''' is the good of '''what''', the good from {{Something}}
*'''good gift''' is the good of '''whether''', the good from {{Nothing}}

Representation has us have expectations, God wish for nothing, and has {{Waiting}} as its seventh perspective. If God wishes for nothing, then look for good in people. Everything is self-sufficient. Waiting = being in suspense, as an emotional response.

See also: {{Spirit}}, {{Structure}}, {{Representations}}, BeginningVEnd, {{Understanding}}, LoveVLife, {{Other}}, SelfVOther

'''Note: I have rethought this as Activity V Structure and am describing this in the page on {{Representations}}.'''

''I am rethinking this - the structure for the four representations - as the relationship SelfVOther between {{Self}} and {{Other}}.''

Four {{Representations}} are given by the relationship between {{Spirit}} and {{Structure}}:

These representations result from considering ''spirit'' and ''structure'' as {{Equals}} and letting them manifest themselves as {{Unequals}} in four ways, yielding four representations (wishes). They are unequal in terms of the distance between themselves, from everything (spirit to spirit) to nothing (structure to structure).

Alternatively, we may consider them as unequals, and let them manifest themselves equals, in which case we have two representations (scopes):{{Beginning}} and {{End}}, see: BeginningVEnd.

I will work here to flesh out these representations based on what I know about the representations of the {{Nullsome}}, {{Onesome}}, {{Twosome}}, {{Threesome}}. There are four levels: why - how - what - whether (or is it +3, +2, +1, +0).

The {{Foursome}} is given by the difference from the end:

''2005.04.26 {{A}}: Kuom skiriasi dvasia ir sandara? {{D}}: Dvasioje yra mano meil&amp;#279; - neribota, o sandaroje yra j&amp;#363;s&amp;#371; meil&amp;#279; - ribota. {{A}}: Kaip gali dvasia ir sandara sutapti? {{D}}: Tiek kiek vienas kit&amp;#261; myli. {{A}}: Vis labiau? {{D}}: Vis giliau, artimiau, nes nepriklausomai. Pamatysi. Laiminu tave.''

''2005.04.09 {{A}}: Koks ryšys tarp laisvumo ir dvasios bei sandaros? {{D}}: Dvasia gyvena per sandar&amp;#261; Ji gali sutapti su ja arba nesutapti.''

''2004.12.13 {{A}}: Kaip keturi atvaizdai susij&amp;#281; su susikalb&amp;#279;jimu? {{D}}: Aš noriu b&amp;#363;ti su visais, b&amp;#363;ti vienas su jais, juos myl&amp;#279;ti. Tad tai yra meil&amp;#279;s s&amp;#261;lygos. {{A}}: Kaip suprasti, meil&amp;#279;s s&amp;#261;lgos? {{D}}: Meilei reikia, kad gal&amp;#279;tum&amp;#279;me gyventi vienas kitame. {{A}}: O k&amp;#261; tai reiškia? {{D}}: Išeiti iš sav&amp;#281;s, ir iš sav&amp;#281;s &amp;#303; kit&amp;#261;, ir iš kito &amp;#303; save, ir iš kito. {{A}}: A&amp;#269;i&amp;#363;. {{D}}: Myliu.''

''2005.04.27 {{A}}: Kaip gali mylintis ir mylimas sutapti? {{D}}: Atskleisk savo \9Aird&amp;#303; ir priimk kit&amp;#261; gyventi savyje - tiek j&amp;#363;s gal&amp;#279;site sutapti. {{A}}: O kaip atskleid\9Eiama \9Airdis? {{D}}: Myl&amp;#279;k - &amp;#303;sakymu kur&amp;#303; priimi, kuriam pakl&amp;#363;sti. Sek mano S&amp;#363;numi. {{A}} ir {{K}}: Gerai.''

''2005.04.26 {{A}}: Kuom skiriasi dvasia ir sandara? {{D}}: Dvasioje yra mano meil&amp;#279; - neribota, o sandaroje yra j&amp;#363;s&amp;#371; meil&amp;#279; - ribota. {{A}}: Kaip gali dvasia ir sandara sutapti? {{D}}: Tiek kiek vienas kit&amp;#261; myli. {{A}}: Vis labiau? {{D}}: Vis giliau, artimiau, nes nepriklausomai. Pamatysi. Laiminu tave.''

''2005.04.25 {{A}}: Kaip suvokti dvasi&amp;#261;, sandar&amp;#261;, atvaizdus ir j&amp;#371; vieningum&amp;#261;? {{D}}: Visa tai leid\9Eia man bendrauti su tavimi bei su kitais. O kiti du atvaizdai leid\9Eia jums bendrauti su manimi. {{A}}: Tai yra m&amp;#363;s&amp;#371; prielaidos. {{D}}: Taip, kad yra \9Airdis.''

''2005.04.20 {{A}}: Koks ry\9Ays tarp dviej&amp;#371; atvaizd&amp;#371; ir keturi&amp;#371; atvaizd&amp;#371;? {{D}}: A\9A myliu, o per jus (\9Airdimi) myliu kit&amp;#261; arba save. Jeigu kit&amp;#261;, tai kartu ir save. A\9A esu tas kitas, tad jeigu myli t&amp;#261; a\9A - save - tai kurioje nors apimtyje. O \9Airdis tai yra tas a\9A, ir ji nesuvokia savo apimties. {{A}}: O i\9A kur ta apimtis? {{D}}: J&amp;#261; nusako kiek a\9A suvokiu, kad \9Airdis ir a\9A esame tas pats. {{A}}: Ma\9Eiau suvokiate, tai didesn&amp;#279; apimtis? {{D}}: Taip yra. Pamatysi.''

''2005.03.17 {{A}}: Kaip gali vienas atvaizdas tikti keturiems padalinimams bet ne visiems? {{D}}: Geras klausimas. Tu pa\9Ei&amp;#363;r&amp;#279;k &amp;#303; savo vid&amp;#371; ir pa\9Ei&amp;#363;r&amp;#279;k atgal ir tada suprasi.''

''2005.03.16 {{A}}: Koks ry\9Ays tarp prad\9Eios ir dvasios ir pabaigos ir sandaros? {{D}}: Prad\9Eios veikla yra myl&amp;#279;ti, o pabaigos veikla yra b&amp;#363;ti mylimam, tad dvasia ir sandara. {{A}}: O k&amp;#261; &amp;#269;ia rei\9Akia myl&amp;#279;ti, kas yra gyvyb&amp;#279;? {{D}}: Myl&amp;#279;ti yra palaikyti gyvyb&amp;#281;. Tu taip sakai ir taip yra. Kaip gyvyb&amp;#279; yra i\9A pabaigos &amp;#303; pabaig&amp;#261;, meil&amp;#279; yra tos veiklos palaikymas. {{A}}: Kas vyksta tame tarpe. {{D}}: Taip, kas vyksta tarp pabaigos ir pabaigos.''

''2004.11.16 {{A}}: Koks atvaizd&amp;#371; vaidmuo susikalb&amp;#279;jime? {{D}}: Turi b&amp;#363;ti po\9Ei&amp;#363;ris &amp;#303; kit&amp;#261; ir per j&amp;#303; atgal &amp;#303; save. Tad turi b&amp;#363;ti &amp;#303;manoma vienu po\9Ei&amp;#363;riu &amp;#303;vairiai priimti kit&amp;#261;.''

The {{Foursome}}, {{Fivesome}}, {{Sixsome}} and {{Sevensome}} have two {{Representations}}: one in terms of an '''observer''', and another in terms of an ObservationalPlane.

Žr. [[Sistemų nagrinėjimas]], [[Trejybė]], taip pat: FourAddOne, Observer, ObservationalPlane

===Representations===

* four RepresentationsOfTheNullsome
* four RepresentationsOfTheOnesome
* four RepresentationsOfTheTwosome
* four RepresentationsOfTheThreesome
* two RepresentationsOfTheFoursome
* two RepresentationsOfTheFivesome
* two RepresentationsOfTheSixsome
* two RepresentationsOfTheSevensome

===There are 6 representations===

Žr. [[Sistemų nagrinėjimas]] taip pat: FourAddOne

Atvaizdai, tai santykis su savastimi: klausimas (atsiplėšimas nuo savęs, didėjantis laisvumas), atsakymas (įsisavinimas, mažėjantis laisvumas) ir apimtys (pjūviai, kaip įeiname į save): viskas, betkas, kažkas, niekas.

'''Požiūrių suvedimas'''

'''representations'''

I went through the six issues, and fixed each one, and considered how the double perspective became a single perspective as I went from the Heart's answer to the associated counterquestion, to the World's answer. For two of the criteria, the single perspective arises as a limiting case of the double perspective.

* Spread When I spread, then over the course of a given interval, there are some things that I will not come upon because they fall outside of the interval (perhaps we have already come upon them, perhaps we would only come upon them much later). But there are other things that I can never come upon regardless of the interval. A double perspective distinguishes what I cannot come upon from what I will not come upon. If the interval is extended in every way, then this extension has, as its limiting case, a single perspective in which ultimately everything either flows into me or not.
* Cleave When I cleave away from myself, there are some things that are no longer part of me. But there are other things that were never a part of me. A double perspective distinguishes what was once a part of me from what was never a part of me. If I cleave further and further out, then the limiting case is a single perspective in which I am tracing out the boundaries of what belongs to me and what does not.

For four of the criteria

* Extend When a function is extended, then the extended function is in agreement with the original function wherever they are both defined. A double perspective considers the two functions separately and distinguishes the matter of where the functions are defined from whether their values agree where they are both defined. A single perspective, however, treats one function as an extension of the other, and focuses on where one is defined, but not the other.
* Induce I judge steps relative to each other, but I take them absolutely. A double perspective distinguishes the calculation I make from the decision, with all of its consequences, that I live through. A single perspective is resigned to the view that what we decide does not keep up with what we live through.
* Accept I select what I will accept based on what I have already accepted. A double perspective distinguishes what I have already accepted from what I will receive. A single perspective identifies the two, and concludes that there is a basis for accepting and rejecting.
* Apply We demand that a rule apply to all situations. A double perspective distinguishes whether the rule holds for situations where it was meant to apply, from whether it holds for other situations as well. A single perspective does not distinguish between the two, and simply looks for possibilities where the rule no longer holds.

See also: {{Observer}}, ObservationalPlane, {{Threesome}}

The {{Foursome}}, {{Fivesome}}, {{Sixsome}}, {{Sevensome}} have representations in terms of the observed and in terms of the observer.

===Observer===

The {{Foursome}}, {{Fivesome}}, {{Sixsome}} and {{Sevensome}} have two {{Representations}}: one in terms of an '''observer''', and another in terms of an ObservationalPlane.

The SecondaryStructures inject an observer from one observational plane into another observational plane.

'''Atvaizdai'''

See also: {{Divisions}}, {{Scopes}}, WaysOfModeling, EverythingVAnything, PropertiesVRepresentations, ConstructiveHypotheses

===What are representations?===

AndriusKulikauskas: {{Divisions}} of {{Everything}} have representations by which we conceive them. I have also used the word ''criteria''. A representation provides us with a vantage point upon a division so that it becomes accessible to us. Without a representation, we are not able to conceive the division.

A representation is:

[[Sistemų nagrinėjimas]]

===Thoughts from Prayer===

''2004.11.16 {{A}}: Koks atvaizd&amp;#371; vaidmuo susikalb&amp;#279;jime? {{D}}: Turi b&amp;#363;ti po\9Ei&amp;#363;ris &amp;#303; kit&amp;#261; ir per j&amp;#303; atgal &amp;#303; save. Tad turi b&amp;#363;ti &amp;#303;manoma vienu po\9Ei&amp;#363;riu &amp;#303;vairiai priimti kit&amp;#261;.''

The SecondaryStructures inject an observer from one observational plane into another observational plane.

The {{Foursome}}, {{Fivesome}}, {{Sixsome}}, {{Sevensome}} have representations in terms of the observed and in terms of the observer.

* Apply We demand that a rule apply to all situations. A double perspective distinguishes whether the rule holds for situations where it was meant to apply, from whether it holds for other situations as well. A single perspective does not distinguish between the two, and simply looks for possibilities where the rule no longer holds.

>><<