我的调查

调查

神的舞蹈

经历的道

知识的房子

神的调查

redaguoti

Mintys.GyvybėsSavybės istorija

Paslėpti nežymius pakeitimus - Rodyti kodo pakeitimus

2022 spalio 01 d., 11:55 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pridėta 27 eilutė:
  • padalinimų poslinkius-ašis
Pakeista 30 eilutė iš:
  • pertvarkymus ir jų tikslus
į:
  • pertvarkymus, jų poveikius ir tikslus
2022 spalio 01 d., 11:54 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeista 25 eilutė iš:

Brėžinyje sulyginau

į:

Brėžinyje bandžiau sulyginti

Pakeistos 30-32 eilutės iš
  • savo ir kitų nuostatas, veiksmus, mintis
į:
  • savo ir kitų veiksmus, mintis, nuostatas
  • širdies logiką ir pasaulio logiką
  • Jėzaus logiką
2022 spalio 01 d., 11:53 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeistos 27-30 eilutės iš
  • ženklų savybes
į:
  • ženklų savybes
  • telkėjus ir jų tikslus
  • pertvarkymus ir jų tikslus
  • savo ir kitų nuostatas, veiksmus, mintis
2022 spalio 01 d., 11:52 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeista 9 eilutė iš:
  • Building blocks - žemėlapynas
į:
  • Aggregation - žemėlapynas
Pridėta 14 eilutė:
  • Building blocks - lentelė
2022 spalio 01 d., 11:11 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeista 15 eilutė iš:

Organizing object

į:

Telkėjai (organizing objects)

2022 spalio 01 d., 11:10 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
2022 spalio 01 d., 11:10 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeistos 3-6 eilutės iš


į:

[+Gyvybės savybės - telkian

Pakeistos 18-26 eilutės iš
  • The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
į:
  • The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.


Brėžinyje sulyginau

  • padalinimus
  • ženklų savybes
2022 spalio 01 d., 10:48 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeistos 17-26 eilutės iš

Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.

Living systems require the freedom for selection within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.

The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.

į:

Organizing object

  • Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.
  • Living systems require the freedom for selection within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
  • The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
2022 spalio 01 d., 10:47 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeistos 11-12 eilutės iš
  • - žemėlapynas
  • Building blocks
į:
  • Building blocks - žemėlapynas
Pakeista 13 eilutė iš:
  • - metraštis
į:
  • Internal models - metraštis
Pridėtos 16-17 eilutės:
2022 spalio 01 d., 10:46 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeistos 1-2 eilutės iš
į:
Pridėtos 7-19 eilutės:

Gyvybės savybės aprašytos David Holland knygoje Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity.

Jas sulyginčiau su pertvarkymais:

  • Diversity - raida
  • - žemėlapynas
  • Building blocks
  • Nonlinearity - vadovėlis
  • - metraštis
  • Tags - žinynas
  • Flows - kelionė
Ištrintos 22-23 eilutės:

Taken from a book on complex systems by David Holland.

2022 spalio 01 d., 10:36 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeistos 1-3 eilutės iš

Žr. Savybės

į:
2014 birželio 08 d., 07:04 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Pridėtos 10-11 eilutės:

The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.

2014 birželio 08 d., 07:04 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Pridėtos 6-9 eilutės:

Living systems require the freedom for selection within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.

Taken from a book on complex systems by David Holland.

2014 birželio 07 d., 10:53 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Pridėtos 1-2 eilutės:

Žr. Savybės

2014 birželio 07 d., 10:46 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Ištrintos 4-141 eilutės:

See also: PrinciplesOfLife, {{Topologies}}, {{Anything}}, {{Everything}}, EverythingVAnything, FifteenPropertiesOfLife


{{Andrius}} [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/363 September 4, 2003]

I went through Christopher Alexander's "The Nature of Order" and his fifteen principles of life.

I will describe them as the features by which "anything" may connect itself with "everything" as centers of life, limited and unlimited.


We can think of "everything" and "anything" as players that wish to link up with each other.

"Anything" plays through a trinity of roles: taking a stand, following through, and reflecting. This cycle is the motor of our life.

"Everything" plays by going beyond itself. It is the infinite recursiveness of Why? It is the same recursiveness in the cycle of our soul - taking a stand, following through, reflecting - which is how we are conscious of everything.

Three of Alexander's properties of life describe this relationship just as it is.

"take a stand" is in "strong centers" (made of other strong centers) "follow through" is in "strong boundaries" (same order of magnitude as centers. itself made up of boundaries) "reflect" is in "levels of scale" (recursive nesting. regular size jumps between scales)

Where is everything? Here it is in the recursive nature, going ever deeper, inward, but also, going back outward, farther than we may imagine.

We are limited, hence unable to conceive directly our connection, but may only allude to it. Our conception is thus given not by this infinite recursion, but through representations of everything. Everything is represented in four ways, as true, direct, constant, significant. Moreover, in its relationship with anything, it is given as a player of a mind game which generates properties of life, of the oneness of the spirit beyond and within structure, of everything and anything.


"Significant" generates a mind game, where significant is that which is unencompassable, can't be captured: If thinking is significant, then so is being, for thoughts are encompassed by the thinker. If being is significant, then so is doing, for things are encompassed by the actions that manifest them. If doing is significant, then so is thinking, for actions are encompassed by the observations made of them.

where is the everything? everything is identified with the relaxation of global centers to allow for restatement through local centers.

"be" is in "not-separateness" (not apart from the world, lack of separation from other centers, blending into them, supporting them, fragmented boundary) "do" is in "gradients" (slow variation of larger center makes for gradient given by new centers) "think" is in "roughness" (relaxation of global constraints so local constraints can have priority)


"Constant" generates a mind game: In searching for constancy, we find one example of constancy, otherwise it is constantly unconstant. So the constancy is in the "one" or in the "all". Note that to do this search, what we select needs to be the same as what we judge, they are multiply constant, "many".

where is the everything? everything is identified with that which searches for centers, perhaps finding one (and breaking symmetry) or not finding one (and leaving symmetry) but especially in the regularity of the "many", which blankets the entire space with centers.

"one" is in the "good shape" (as a shape, made of multiple coherent centers, built from simple elemental structures, clear building blocks with distinct symmetries. regularity allows for cross- relationships, clear division of function, etc.) "all" is in the "local symmetries" (default solution is symmetry, a pre-filling of space) "many" is in the "positive space" (every part is whole onto itself, not leftover, has a strong center. all space useful, evenhanded complements, no wasted space.)


"Direct" generates a mind game: Our attention can be directed by something other than itself, an "object". Subsequently, it can be directed by itself, this is "process". Finally, it may or may not be directed, this is "subject".

where is the everything? everything is identified with that which gives attention to centers, and especially, the subject, the ambiguity and interlock.

"object" is in the "contrast" (creation of differentiation, acknowledgement of purposeful, meaningful centers) "process" is in the "echoes" (repetition of motif at different levels, same angles as building blocks, same process involved) "subject" is in the "deep interlock and ambiguity" (center and its complement enmeshed by shared and ambiguous subcenters)


"True" generates a mind game, where true is what can't be hidden, is obvious:

The content and what reveals it may be the same, in which case it is "necessarily" true. Otherwise, the content may be different from what reveals it, and follows it, so is "actually" true. Finally, what may be true is the relationship between the content and what reveals it, which is "possibly" true.

where is the everything? everything is identified with that which serves as the center, and especially the void, what is possible.

"necessary" is in the "simplicity and inner calm" (unnecessary is taken away, freely focused on function. slow) "actual" is in the "alternating repetition" (intensified by counterpoint of systems. continually engages the eye, recurring action, space repeats, oscillation) "possible" is in the "void" (solid contrast to the clutter that surrounds it, connects with infinite void, brings life to mass of small centers)

2014 birželio 07 d., 10:45 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Pakeistos 3-142 eilutės iš

Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.

į:

Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.

See also: PrinciplesOfLife, {{Topologies}}, {{Anything}}, {{Everything}}, EverythingVAnything, FifteenPropertiesOfLife


{{Andrius}} [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/363 September 4, 2003]

I went through Christopher Alexander's "The Nature of Order" and his fifteen principles of life.

I will describe them as the features by which "anything" may connect itself with "everything" as centers of life, limited and unlimited.


We can think of "everything" and "anything" as players that wish to link up with each other.

"Anything" plays through a trinity of roles: taking a stand, following through, and reflecting. This cycle is the motor of our life.

"Everything" plays by going beyond itself. It is the infinite recursiveness of Why? It is the same recursiveness in the cycle of our soul - taking a stand, following through, reflecting - which is how we are conscious of everything.

Three of Alexander's properties of life describe this relationship just as it is.

"take a stand" is in "strong centers" (made of other strong centers) "follow through" is in "strong boundaries" (same order of magnitude as centers. itself made up of boundaries) "reflect" is in "levels of scale" (recursive nesting. regular size jumps between scales)

Where is everything? Here it is in the recursive nature, going ever deeper, inward, but also, going back outward, farther than we may imagine.

We are limited, hence unable to conceive directly our connection, but may only allude to it. Our conception is thus given not by this infinite recursion, but through representations of everything. Everything is represented in four ways, as true, direct, constant, significant. Moreover, in its relationship with anything, it is given as a player of a mind game which generates properties of life, of the oneness of the spirit beyond and within structure, of everything and anything.


"Significant" generates a mind game, where significant is that which is unencompassable, can't be captured: If thinking is significant, then so is being, for thoughts are encompassed by the thinker. If being is significant, then so is doing, for things are encompassed by the actions that manifest them. If doing is significant, then so is thinking, for actions are encompassed by the observations made of them.

where is the everything? everything is identified with the relaxation of global centers to allow for restatement through local centers.

"be" is in "not-separateness" (not apart from the world, lack of separation from other centers, blending into them, supporting them, fragmented boundary) "do" is in "gradients" (slow variation of larger center makes for gradient given by new centers) "think" is in "roughness" (relaxation of global constraints so local constraints can have priority)


"Constant" generates a mind game: In searching for constancy, we find one example of constancy, otherwise it is constantly unconstant. So the constancy is in the "one" or in the "all". Note that to do this search, what we select needs to be the same as what we judge, they are multiply constant, "many".

where is the everything? everything is identified with that which searches for centers, perhaps finding one (and breaking symmetry) or not finding one (and leaving symmetry) but especially in the regularity of the "many", which blankets the entire space with centers.

"one" is in the "good shape" (as a shape, made of multiple coherent centers, built from simple elemental structures, clear building blocks with distinct symmetries. regularity allows for cross- relationships, clear division of function, etc.) "all" is in the "local symmetries" (default solution is symmetry, a pre-filling of space) "many" is in the "positive space" (every part is whole onto itself, not leftover, has a strong center. all space useful, evenhanded complements, no wasted space.)


"Direct" generates a mind game: Our attention can be directed by something other than itself, an "object". Subsequently, it can be directed by itself, this is "process". Finally, it may or may not be directed, this is "subject".

where is the everything? everything is identified with that which gives attention to centers, and especially, the subject, the ambiguity and interlock.

"object" is in the "contrast" (creation of differentiation, acknowledgement of purposeful, meaningful centers) "process" is in the "echoes" (repetition of motif at different levels, same angles as building blocks, same process involved) "subject" is in the "deep interlock and ambiguity" (center and its complement enmeshed by shared and ambiguous subcenters)


"True" generates a mind game, where true is what can't be hidden, is obvious:

The content and what reveals it may be the same, in which case it is "necessarily" true. Otherwise, the content may be different from what reveals it, and follows it, so is "actually" true. Finally, what may be true is the relationship between the content and what reveals it, which is "possibly" true.

where is the everything? everything is identified with that which serves as the center, and especially the void, what is possible.

"necessary" is in the "simplicity and inner calm" (unnecessary is taken away, freely focused on function. slow) "actual" is in the "alternating repetition" (intensified by counterpoint of systems. continually engages the eye, recurring action, space repeats, oscillation) "possible" is in the "void" (solid contrast to the clutter that surrounds it, connects with infinite void, brings life to mass of small centers)

2014 birželio 06 d., 12:14 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Pakeistos 1-3 eilutės iš
į:

Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.

2013 gruodžio 28 d., 22:05 atliko Andrius Kulikauskas -
Pridėta 1 eilutė:

GyvybėsSavybės


Naujausi pakeitimai


靠真理

网站

Įvadas #E9F5FC

Klausimai #FFFFC0

Teiginiai #FFFFFF

Kitų mintys #EFCFE1

Dievas man #FFECC0

Iš ankščiau #CCFFCC

Mieli skaitytojai, visa mano kūryba ir kartu visi šie puslapiai yra visuomenės turtas, kuriuo visi kviečiami laisvai naudotis, dalintis, visaip perkurti. - Andrius

redaguoti

Puslapis paskutinį kartą pakeistas 2022 spalio 01 d., 11:55