神的舞蹈

经历的道

知识的房子

神的调查

redaguoti

Mintys.ValiosIšraiškos istorija

Paslėpti nežymius pakeitimus - Rodyti galutinio teksto pakeitimus

2024 vasario 20 d., 15:13 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pridėtos 18-19 eilutės:
* Kaip valios išraiškos susijusios su suvokimo lygmenimis ir žmogaus sąmoningumo atsisakymu?
* Koks padalinimų vaidmuo valios išraiškose ir jų raidoje?
Pakeistos 22-23 eilutės iš
* Kaip valios išraiškos susijusios su suvokimo lygmenimis ir žmogaus sąmoningumo atsisakymu?
į:
Pakeistos 44-45 eilutės iš
Tai atjautose iškylantis septintasis požiūris kuomet vieno lygmens troškimas atjaučia kito lygmens netroškimą. Kitaip tarus, vieno lygmens nulinis požiūris atjaučia kito lygmens septintąjį požiūrį. Tuo pačiu nuliniam požiūriui tenka atjausti ir visus kitus to lygmens požiūrius.
į:
Tai atjautose iškylantis septintasis požiūris kuomet vieno lygmens troškimas atjaučia kito lygmens netroškimą. Kitaip tarus, vieno lygmens nulinis požiūris atjaučia kito lygmens septintąjį požiūrį. Tuo pačiu nuliniam požiūriui tenka atjausti ir visus kitus to lygmens požiūrius. Septintasis požiūris yra vartai į visus kitus santvarkos požiūrius.

'''Nuodėmės verčia reikšti valią'''
Pakeistos 49-62 eilutės iš
'''Nuodėmės verčia reikšti valią'''

* Killing = forcing to suffer.
* Adultery = forcing to love.
* Stealing = forcing to rely on.
* Lying = forcing to believe.
* Coveting people = forcing to be uptight.
* Coveting things = forcing to get engrossed.

We're commanded not to do such things. It suggests an interesting idea: suffering, etc
. may all be good, as an expression of the will. But we should not force people to express their will!

In the system that I'm working out, these ways of expressing the will should play a central role. I was writing up how all of these structures unfolded, but then I noticed that I was making use of one of the very structures that I was going to describe, which I call "the divisions of everything". That's not so bad, but it made me wonder, is this a special property of this particular structure, its role in defining things, and what do all the other structures offer?
į:
* Žudymas verčia kentėti
* Svetimavimas verčia mylėti
* Vagystė verčia remtis
* Meluoti verčia tikėti
* Geisti žmones verčia laukti, gyventi nežinojime
* Geisti turtą verčia įsijausti, gyventi žinojime

Mes įsakyti viso to nedaryti. Kentėti ir taip toliau savaime gali būti gera, gali būti valios raiška, bet nedera kitus versti reikšti savo valią
.
2024 vasario 20 d., 15:07 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeistos 13-17 eilutės iš
Valios išraiškos
į:
Valia
* Koks yra valios (sutikimo, pritarimo) vaidmuo valios išraiškose?
* Kaip valios išraiškos susijusios su valia ir vertybėmis?

Kitos sandaros
Pakeistos 20-21 eilutės iš
* What is the role of Willingness?
* How does this unfolding relate to that expressed in terms of Willingness or in terms of the kinds of Understanding and the LostChild metaphor
?
į:
* Kaip valios išraiškos susijusios su suvokimo lygmenimis ir žmogaus sąmoningumo atsisakymu?
2024 vasario 20 d., 15:04 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeistos 3-4 eilutės iš
[[Valia]], [[Atjautos]]
į:
[[Valia]], [[Atjautos]], [[Išsivystymas]]
Pakeistos 24-25 eilutės iš
Šešios valios išraiškos yra:
į:
Šešios valios išraiškos yra septintasis požiūris iškylantis netroškimų atmainose, Dievo troškimui atjaučiant žmogaus netroškimą. Septintuoju požiūriu žmogus kitu išgyvena šią Dievo atjautą.
Pridėta 32 eilutė:
Anglų kalba:
2021 gegužės 27 d., 14:43 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Ištrintos 43-46 eilutės:
'''Aš renkuosi vietoj kad mums derėtų'''

I want to apply knowledge to remake our world, and engage it rather than just rise above it. I look for inspiration to Christ's Sermon on the Mount where I think he distinguishes between the logic of "I choose" and "we should".
Ištrintos 56-88 eilutės:
Kokia prasmė viso šio žinojimo? Keturi netroškimai yra savaime vertingi, mums leidžia:

* not be ruled by our needs, but know how to respond to them, get around them, or simply not have them.
* address all of our doubts, be able to find our bearings no matter how questionable our experience, and exercise perfect intelligence by asking counterquestions.
* understand our expectations, our emotional responses, and how to respond to them, and live in suspense, or be at peace.
* hear God in our life's trials, choose his will over ours when we're connected with him, and live by our own principles when we're not.

I value such knowledge. I find it useful. But it is knowledge that elevates our thinking so that we can live above this world. So it doesn't really connect much with any attachment we have to this world. It frees the spirit, but not the soul.

I think the point of life is to do things in this world, to inject our spirit here and remake this world we have entered into. It's very good that we can rise above this world, but the point is to engage it.

So I thought about Christ, who I choose to follow. What attracts me most about Christ is that he says how to directly take on the issues of this world. "Love God", "Love your neighbor as yourself", and in his Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5) he punches out a platform of very practical ways to engage this life. I don't see much conscious effort by people to apply this, but we could do it. This is a kind of knowledge that I think is useful in this world, and engages it, and remakes it.

'''Šešios Jėzaus antitezės'''

Jesus makes six statements that are known as "antitheses" because he says, "You have heard it said... but I tell you..." For example, you have heard "an eye for an eye" but Jesus says "turn the other cheek". A couple of years ago, I tried to figure out his logic for these statements. In this one, I think he's saying that rather than account (an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth), we should satisfy (turning the cheek, walking the extra mile, giving away our coat).

I went back over these logics, and I think they relate to the ways we express our will. In the case above, relying on others is a way of expressing our will, and there is something holy about that. Yet stealing is wrong to the extent that it forces us to rely on others. There is also something useless about prescribing that we rely on others, something futile about insisting that we should. That is what accounting is all about: you should rely on others as to what belongs to you, and what does not. Instead, he seems to say, why don't just satisfy them? Just give everything away, and choose to rely on others.

In each case, I think it says that instead of prescribing us to express our will, we should rather simply choose to express our will. For example, we can express our will by believing. Lying forces people to believe. Convincing tells them they should believe. Instead, why not just choose to believe: take a stand.

This is important to me here because it suggests ways that knowledge can be used practically to remake this world.

* be unconditional, rather than consistent
* save, rather than blame
* take a stand, rather than convince
* satisfy, rather than account
* be one with, rather than accomodate
* be at peace with, rather than condemn

I wrote about my interest to integrate raw initiative and to create a system to fit together our work so that we could support and encourage each other effortlessly.

I want such a system to be based on our choice to express our own will, rather than what we think people should do. I find it very hard to eliminate "should" from my thinking!
2021 gegužės 27 d., 14:38 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pakeistos 42-93 eilutės iš
Šešios valios išraiškos grindžia šešis neigiamus Dievo įsakymus mylėti artimą, nekenkti jam, neversti jo pareikšti savo valią. Valia turėtų būti laisva ir savanoriška.
į:
Šešios valios išraiškos grindžia šešis neigiamus Dievo įsakymus mylėti artimą, nekenkti jam, neversti jo pareikšti savo valią. Valia turėtų būti laisva ir savanoriška.

'''Aš renkuosi vietoj kad mums derėtų'''

I want to apply knowledge to remake our world, and engage it rather than just rise above it. I look for inspiration to Christ's Sermon on the Mount where I think he distinguishes between the logic of "I choose" and "we should".

'''Nuodėmės verčia reikšti valią'''

* Killing = forcing to suffer.
* Adultery = forcing to love.
* Stealing = forcing to rely on.
* Lying = forcing to believe.
* Coveting people = forcing to be uptight.
* Coveting things = forcing to get engrossed.

We're commanded not to do such things. It suggests an interesting idea: suffering, etc. may all be good, as an expression of the will. But we should not force people to express their will!

In the system that I'm working out, these ways of expressing the will should play a central role. I was writing up how all of these structures unfolded, but then I noticed that I was making use of one of the very structures that I was going to describe, which I call "the divisions of everything". That's not so bad, but it made me wonder, is this a special property of this particular structure, its role in defining things, and what do all the other structures offer?

Kokia prasmė viso šio žinojimo? Keturi netroškimai yra savaime vertingi, mums leidžia:

* not be ruled by our needs, but know how to respond to them, get around them, or simply not have them.
* address all of our doubts, be able to find our bearings no matter how questionable our experience, and exercise perfect intelligence by asking counterquestions.
* understand our expectations, our emotional responses, and how to respond to them, and live in suspense, or be at peace.
* hear God in our life's trials, choose his will over ours when we're connected with him, and live by our own principles when we're not.

I value such knowledge. I find it useful. But it is knowledge that elevates our thinking so that we can live above this world. So it doesn't really connect much with any attachment we have to this world. It frees the spirit, but not the soul.

I think the point of life is to do things in this world, to inject our spirit here and remake this world we have entered into. It's very good that we can rise above this world, but the point is to engage it.

So I thought about Christ, who I choose to follow. What attracts me most about Christ is that he says how to directly take on the issues of this world. "Love God", "Love your neighbor as yourself", and in his Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5) he punches out a platform of very practical ways to engage this life. I don't see much conscious effort by people to apply this, but we could do it. This is a kind of knowledge that I think is useful in this world, and engages it, and remakes it.

'''Šešios Jėzaus antitezės'''

Jesus makes six statements that are known as "antitheses" because he says, "You have heard it said... but I tell you..." For example, you have heard "an eye for an eye" but Jesus says "turn the other cheek". A couple of years ago, I tried to figure out his logic for these statements. In this one, I think he's saying that rather than account (an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth), we should satisfy (turning the cheek, walking the extra mile, giving away our coat).

I went back over these logics, and I think they relate to the ways we express our will. In the case above, relying on others is a way of expressing our will, and there is something holy about that. Yet stealing is wrong to the extent that it forces us to rely on others. There is also something useless about prescribing that we rely on others, something futile about insisting that we should. That is what accounting is all about: you should rely on others as to what belongs to you, and what does not. Instead, he seems to say, why don't just satisfy them? Just give everything away, and choose to rely on others.

In each case, I think it says that instead of prescribing us to express our will, we should rather simply choose to express our will. For example, we can express our will by believing. Lying forces people to believe. Convincing tells them they should believe. Instead, why not just choose to believe: take a stand.

This is important to me here because it suggests ways that knowledge can be used practically to remake this world.

* be unconditional, rather than consistent
* save, rather than blame
* take a stand, rather than convince
* satisfy, rather than account
* be one with, rather than accomodate
* be at peace with, rather than condemn

I wrote about my interest to integrate raw initiative and to create a system to fit together our work so that we could support and encourage each other effortlessly.

I want such a system to be based on our choice to express our own will, rather than what we think people should do. I find it very hard to eliminate "should" from my thinking!
2021 gegužės 27 d., 14:36 atliko AndriusKulikauskas -
Pridėtos 1-42 eilutės:
>>bgcolor=#E9F5FC<<
-------------------
[[Valia]], [[Atjautos]]

'''Kaip valios išraiškos grindžia vienumo pagrindus?'''

-------------------
>><<
[++++意志表达++++]
>>bgcolor=#FFFFC0<<
-----------------------

Valios išraiškos
* Kuria prasme valios raiškos yra betko atvaizdai?
* Ar valios raiškos grindžia vienumo pagrindus?
* What is the role of Willingness?
* How does this unfolding relate to that expressed in terms of Willingness or in terms of the kinds of Understanding and the LostChild metaphor?

---------------
>><<

'''Valios išraiškos'''

Šešios valios išraiškos yra:

* Dvejonė: Ar darau ką nors tuo klausimu? (įsitraukti)
* Jaudulys: Įtampa. (laukti)
* Atsiliepimas: Gryna valia. (tikėti)
* Tėve mūsų: Gelbėk mus nuo pikto. (atsiremti)
* šv.Petro raktai į dangų: Meilė. (mylėti)
* Palaiminimai: Palaiminti, kurie persekiojami dėl teisybės, jų yra dangaus karalystė. (kentėti)

* engaging
* waiting
* believing
* relying
* loving
* suffering

Tai atjautose iškylantis septintasis požiūris kuomet vieno lygmens troškimas atjaučia kito lygmens netroškimą. Kitaip tarus, vieno lygmens nulinis požiūris atjaučia kito lygmens septintąjį požiūrį. Tuo pačiu nuliniam požiūriui tenka atjausti ir visus kitus to lygmens požiūrius.

Šešios valios išraiškos grindžia šešis neigiamus Dievo įsakymus mylėti artimą, nekenkti jam, neversti jo pareikšti savo valią. Valia turėtų būti laisva ir savanoriška.

ValiosIšraiškos


Naujausi pakeitimai


靠真理

网站

Įvadas #E9F5FC

Klausimai #FFFFC0

Teiginiai #FFFFFF

Kitų mintys #EFCFE1

Dievas man #FFECC0

Iš ankščiau #CCFFCC

Mieli skaitytojai, visa mano kūryba ir kartu visi šie puslapiai yra visuomenės turtas, kuriuo visi kviečiami laisvai naudotis, dalintis, visaip perkurti. - Andrius

redaguoti

Puslapis paskutinį kartą pakeistas 2024 vasario 20 d., 15:13