Book (English)

Knyga

Dievo šokis

Kaip gyventi

Išsiaiškinimai

Malda

Andrius

Užrašai

Mokykla

Juodraštis? FFFFFF

Užrašai EEEEEE

Klausimai FFFFC0

Gvildenimai CAE7FA

Pavyzdžiai? ECD9EC

Šaltiniai? EFCFE1

Duomenys? FFE6E6

Išsiaiškinimai D8F1D8

Pratimai? FF9999

Dievas man? FFECC0

Pavaizdavimai? E6E6FF

Istorija AAAAAA


Asmeniškai? BA9696

Mieli dalyviai! Visa mano kūryba ir kartu visi šie puslapiai yra visuomenės turtas, kuriuo visi kviečiami laisvai naudotis, dalintis, visaip perkurti. - Andrius

Įranga

redaguoti

Už mūsų, kas nauja, o mumyse, kas lieka. Dievas juos sieja, o mes "savimi" esame ryšys tarp jų, esame sandara, save vis naujai apibrėžianti. Tad išgyvename įtampą, klausimas iššaukia atsakymą. Randant tiesą, Dievas sutampa su savimi.

Save apibrėžianti sandara yra trejybė, tai pirma ir paskutinė sandara, iškylanti aštuongubiu keliu siejant Dievo ir žmogaus požiūrius.

See also: Knowledge, Theory, Overview, Structure

The Facts of life are a variety of structures that one can observe as given by the limits of our imagination and experience:

  • SecondaryStructures
  • PrimaryStructures
  • Omniscope
  • GoingBeyondOneself

And a Theory can make sense of these Facts. The facts are Knowledge, they are what we can understand and thereby distinguish between BeingOneWith and NotBeingOneWith.

Nepriklausomi

Independents are SecondaryStructures which are static.

They may be thought of as negating the properties of everything, which is to say, the RepresentationsOfTheOnesome.

  • Independents themselves negate the property that everything is a required concept
  • {{Divisions}} negate the property that everything has no internal structure
  • {{Representations}} negate the property that everything is the simplest algorithm
  • {{Topologies}} negate the property that everything has no external context

These may be applied to everything, but also to other concepts, hence they are independents. Perhaps {{Concepts}} are that which independents may be applied to.

The independents are perhaps related by the equation X is the unity of representations of structure of X. This equation is true if we consider the {{Beginning}} X and the {{End}} X to be the same (as in the human outlook) but not true if we consider them different (as in God's outlook). Here we may understand structure to mean division and unity to mean topology, in the general sense.

Neprasmingi

Insignificants are SecondaryStructures which are dynamic. They may be thought of as {{Languages}}. They are not significant, which is to say, they may be encompassed, and in that sense, they express what may be compressed and ignored. They may be thought of as {{Activity}} which complements the {{Structure}} provided by the {{Independents}}.

They may be thought of as negating the RepresentationsOfTheNullsome: true, direct, constant, significant.

  • {{Argumentation}} allows for what is not true.
  • {{Verbalization}} allows for what is not direct.
  • {{Narration}} allows for what is not constant.
  • {{Insignificants}} allow for what is not significant.

See also: {{Structure}}


[http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/364 October 13, 2003]

Hi Joseph and all!

I've made a lot of progress in unifying what I know about various structures. I'll be sharing my notes here so that I write them out and don't forget. I invite and encourage us all to work here.

I note Flemming's investigation into different kinds of patterns at http://ming.tv and http://ming.tv/flemming2.php/_d10/_v10/__show_day/_w2003-09-28#000010-000896 and he also notes the Uplift Pattern Languages.

As Flemming writes: "But patterns are essentially a way of successfully navigating an otherwise confusing world. A pattern is the way things are arranged. Without worrying too much about the exact things that are arranged, one concerns oneself with the arrangement they're in. Structure as opposed to content."

I think of this as being aware of the limits of our mind, and how they affect us. There aren't that many structures out there, at least not "genuine" structures that actually constrain our intuition. I will write separately about my thoughts.

Andrius


JosephGoguen [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/365 October 13, 2003]

Andrius, Id like to disagree radically with your claim that there are very few cognitively genuine structures. Just now Im working with a student on structures for computer generated multimedia events, and also on a course on how music works in anime (Japanese animation) and other multimedia works, and have been strongly struck by the enormous variety of possible structures. This is not just some vague intuition, followed by making a list of what intuition came up with, but an empirical investigation of actual works, using formal notation, and asking the hard question of what it would take to in fact generate that work. The problem is that there are many different threads that hold these works together, including narrative, metaphor, image, color, texture, pace, and more, all interleaved in a most complex way; even the structure of narrative is much more complex than you might at first imagine.

See http://www.cs.ucsd.edu/users/goguen/papers/story.html

Sandara

See also: {{Omniscope}}, {{Spirit}}, SpiritVStructure, {{Activity}}, PrimaryStructures, SecondaryStructures, {{Self}}, {{SelfUnderstanding}}, LoveSelf, {{Divisions}}, Summary

===What is Structure?===

What is Structure?

  • is Superfluous
  • is that which is common to Persons
  • the limitations on a DefaultPerspective that it might coincide with an IndependentPerspective
  • relates the DefaultPerspective and the IndependentPerspective as the unconditional (being one with) and the conditional (not being one with) until the independent perspective becomes consciously one with the default perspective.
  • relates a DefaultPerspective and an IndependentPerspective.
  • gives the conditions for BeingOneWith an independent perspective:
    • Good based on Definition, GoingBeyondOneself
    • Slack based on Divergence
    • Coinciding based on Distinctions
    • Perfection based on Divisions
    • Experiencing based on Separation
  • is given by NotExperiencing and defines Experiencing. Understanding applies NotExperiencing as a prescription (a rule) rather than as a definition.
  • is self-limitation.
  • is characterized by NotExperiencing for it provides the conditions for being one with in the context of not being one with.
  • is {{Self}}.

Structure

  • defines God as Truth for a Person
  • is that by which Person sees Everything (NotGod) from their Scope (NotPerson), indeed, the relevant PropertyOfEverything
  • is a context for existence (in Scope) and nonexistence (beyond Scope)
  • expresses being alone or not, for example, Counterquestions express coinciding, Doubts express not coinciding
  • is not-aloneness. It distinguishes one from one's activity, one's self by expressing what one knows, thus giving one's framework by which we are not alone. It fixes Person and derives Scope. Structure is what Person knows about Scope, his being separate in System, thus his Existence in System, his being within system. Structure is the identification of one with one's activity, thus God with his question, so that the Activity is not alone, thus is Structure.

===Examples of Structure===

  • {{Everything}} is the structure of {{God}}
  • {{Slack}} is the structure of {{Good}}
  • {{Anything}} is the structure of {{Life}}

===Structure and Activity===

Structure is that which arises discontinuously, and thus is digital, whereas Activity is that which arises continuously, and thus is analogue. The two are related by the operation [AddTwo +2].

NullStructure is added, whereas NullActivity is removed.

===Structural Ideas about Structure===

Perhaps all structure may be thought of as an {{Interpolation}} between everything and slack, hence related to {{Divisions}}. See the EightfoldWay.

Structure is a level in the equations for the Unity of the Representations of the Structure of Spirit.

===Tasks===

Tasks

  • describe general structure: what does it mean to take up a perspective?
  • describe the primary structures as arising from general structure, consider especially the expectations and how the topologies and the criteria derive from the pretexts for outreach
  • describe the secondary structures, especially the three languages, as arising from primary structures

===Other structures to analyze===

  • WaysOfRethinking
  • LogicOfHeartAndWorld
  • RequirementsOfLivingSystems
  • RequirementsOfMentalSystems
  • Visualizations
  • MentalMovements
  • AndriusDailyRoutine
  • MotivationalDrives

Sandaros


Naujausi pakeitimai


Puslapis paskutinį kartą pakeistas 2014 lapkričio 09 d., 19:20
Tweet